The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 55 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Capacity to Delay Reward Differentiates Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Obsessive-Compulsive Personality Disorder
Open accessAbstract
Background Although the relationship between obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and obsessive-compulsive personality disorder (OCPD) has long been debated, clinical samples of OCD (without OCPD) and OCPD (without OCD) have never been systematically compared. We studied whether individuals with OCD, OCPD, or both conditions differ on symptomatology, functioning, and a measure of self-control: the capacity to delay reward.Methods Twenty-five OCD, 25 OCPD, 25 comorbid OCD + OCPD, and 25 healthy control subjects completed clinical assessments and a validated intertemporal choice task that measures capacity to forego small immediate rewards for larger delayed rewards.Results OCD and OCPD subjects both showed impairment in psychosocial functioning and quality of life, as well as compulsive behavior, but only subjects with OCD reported obsessions. Individuals with OCPD, with or without comorbid OCD, discounted the value of delayed monetary rewards significantly less than OCD and healthy control subjects. This excessive capacity to delay reward discriminates OCPD from OCD and is associated with perfectionism and rigidity.Conclusions OCD and OCPD are both impairing disorders marked by compulsive behaviors, but they can be differentiated by the presence of obsessions in OCD and by excessive capacity to delay reward in OCPD. That individuals with OCPD show less temporal discounting (suggestive of excessive self-control), whereas prior studies have shown that individuals with substance use disorders show greater discounting (suggestive of impulsivity), supports the premise that this component of self-control lies on a continuum in which both extremes (impulsivity and overcontrol) contribute to psychopathology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Some studies have found significantly higher delay discounting rates in OCD patients, indicating increased impulsivity, while other studies have reported no significant differences in delay discounting between OCD patients and healthy controls (See Table 3).”
From Neural mechanisms underlying cognitive inflexibility in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a review (2026) · cites this paper as [150]
In the citing paper
“However, few empirical data is available on delayed reward discounting in patients with OCD [35].”
From P300 and delay-discounting in obsessive–compulsive disorder (2022) · cites this paper as [35]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
The Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale: I. Development, Use, and Reliability
Goodman, W. K. (1989) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110048007 · Cited by 7,712
Delay of gratification in children.
Mischel, W., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M. L. (1989) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2658056 · Cited by 3,397
Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards
McClure, S. M., Laibson, D. I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100907 · Cited by 3,089
(1997) · American Psychiatric Press eBooks · Cited by 3,056
The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory: Development and validation of a short version.
Foa, E. B., Huppert, J. D., Leiberg, S., Langner, R., Kichic, R., Hajcak, G., & Salkovskis, P. M. (2002) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.14.4.485 · Cited by 2,959
The Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale: measures of internal consistency.
Kim, S.-W., Dysken, M., Pheley, A., & Hoover, K. M. (1994) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/0165-1781(94)90039-6 · Cited by 2,333
(1993) · PubMed · Cited by 1,900
Assessment of social adjustment by patient self report.
Weissman, M. M. (1976) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770090101010 · Cited by 1,782
Delayed reward discounting and addictive behavior: a meta-analysis
MacKillop, J., Amlung, M. T., Few, L. R., Ray, L. A., Sweet, L. H., & Munafò, M. R. (2011) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2229-0 · Cited by 1,021
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lynch TR, Hempel RJ, Clark LA (in press): Flexibility and radical openness: Facilitating self-inquiry in overcontrolled personality disorders. In: Livesley J, Dimaggio G, Clarkin J, editors. Integrated Treatment of Personality Disorder. New York: Guilford.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nigg, J. T. (2017) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12675 · Cited by 1,518
Delay Discounting as a Transdiagnostic Process in Psychiatric Disorders
Amlung, M. T., Marsden, E., Holshausen, K., Morris, V. L., Patel, H., Vedelago, L., Naish, K. R., Reed, D. D., & McCabe, R. E. (2019) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2102 · Cited by 396
The Malleability of Intertemporal Choice
Lempert, K. M., & Phelps, E. A. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.09.005 · Cited by 207
A dual‐systems perspective on addiction: contributions from neuroimaging and cognitive training
McClure, S. M., & Bickel, W. K. (2014) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12561 · Cited by 209
Can delay discounting deliver on the promise of RDoC?
Lempert, K. M., STEINGLASS, J. E., Pinto, A., Kable, J. W., & Simpson, H. B. (2018) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291718001770 · Cited by 193
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pinto, A., Steinglass, J. E., Greene, A. L., Weber, E. U., & Simpson, H. B.
- Affiliations
- New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pinto, Anthony
- Venue
- Biological Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-04
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 653-659
- ISSN
- 0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3969772
- OpenAlex
- W2091961865
- Cited by
- 169
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9
- FWCI
- 12.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (K23 MH080221, K23 MH076195, K24 MH091555)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- obsessive-compulsive disorder, obsessive-compulsive personality disorder, intertemporal choice, delay discounting, self-control, impulsivity, overcontrol, obsession, compulsive behavior, perfectionism, rigidity, comorbidities, psychosocial functioning, quality of life
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Compulsive Personality Disorder, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Middle Aged, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Quality of Life, Reward, ROC Curve, Time Factors, Comorbidity, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review