Cited by 118Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersNeurological disorders and treatmentsTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Connectomic deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder

Open access
Baldermann, Juan Carlos, Schüller, Thomas, Kohl, Sina, Voon, Valerie, Li, Ningfei, Hollunder, Barbara, Figee, Martijn, Haber, Suzanne N. +12 more·2021·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder is among the most disabling psychiatric disorders. Although deep brain stimulation is considered an effective treatment, its use in clinical practice is not fully established. This is, at least in part, due to ambiguity about the best suited target and insufficient knowledge about underlying mechanisms. Recent advances suggest that changes in broader brain networks are responsible for improvement of obsessions and compulsions, rather than local impact at the stimulation site. These findings were fueled by innovative methodological approaches using brain connectivity analyses in combination with neuromodulatory interventions. Such a connectomic approach for neuromodulation constitutes an integrative account that aims to characterize optimal target networks. In this critical review, we integrate findings from connectomic studies and deep brain stimulation interventions to characterize a neural network presumably effective in reducing obsessions and compulsions. To this end, we scrutinize methodologies and seemingly conflicting findings with the aim to merge observations to identify common and diverse pathways for treating obsessive-compulsive disorder. Ultimately, we propose a unified network that-when modulated by means of cortical or subcortical interventions-alleviates obsessive-compulsive symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.07.010

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The connectomic DBS simulation approach may partly reduce ambiguity about the best intervention target and is suitable for brain disorders involving several abnormal circuits, such as OCD.

    “It may partly reduce the ambiguity about the best intervention target and is quite suitable for brain disorders that involve several abnormal circuits, e.g., OCD (For a review, see (Baldermann et al., 2021)).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baldermann, J. C., Schüller, T., Kohl, S., Voon, V., Li, N., Hollunder, B., Figee, M., Haber, S. N., Sheth, S. A., Mosley, P. E., Huys, D., Johnson, K. A., Butson, C., Ackermans, L., Bouwens van der Vlis, T., Leentjens, A. F. G., Barbe, M., Visser-Vandewalle, V., Kuhn, J., & Horn, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Cologne (DE)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • University of Florida Health (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Baldermann, Juan Carlos
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
90
Issue
10
Pages
678-688
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3186417280
Cited by
118
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 8
FWCI
2.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kölner Universitäts PublikationsServer (Universität zu Köln) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt
  • National Institutes of Health (MH106435)
  • UCB
  • Medtronic
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 1451, 424778381, 410169619, 424778381 \u2013 TRR 295, 431549029 \u2013SFB 1451)
  • Boston Scientific Corporation
  • EU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
obsessive-compulsive disorder, deep brain stimulation, connectomics, brain networks, neuromodulation, stimulation targets, obsessions and compulsions, therapeutic mechanisms
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Treatment Outcome, Deep Brain Stimulation, Connectome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review