Cited by 329Neurological disorders and treatmentsObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Treatment of psychiatric illness by stereotactic cingulotomy

Ballantine, H.Thomas, Bouckoms, Anthony J., Thomas, Elizabeth K., Giriunas, Ida E.·1987·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

The treatment of 198 psychiatrically disabled patients with stereotactic cingulotomy was evaluated prospectively for a mean follow-up of 8.6 years. Patients with major affective disorders and anxiety disorders fared the best, with a return to normal functioning in the majority. Patients with obsessive-compulsive disorders, schizophrenia, and personality disorders improved less predictably, with an uneven improvement in functioning that required active ongoing psychiatric treatment. Low mortality and morbidity, a reduction of violent behavior, a possible reduction of suicidal risk, and a lessening of the intractable suffering of chronic psychiatric illness all indicate that cingulotomy can be an effective, safe treatment for patients with affective disorders that are unresponsive to all other forms of therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0006-3223(87)90080-1

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A prospective analysis of 198 cases with bilateral cingulum bundle lesions pointed to lasting improvements in approximately half of those treated for obsessive compulsive disorders.

    “A prospective analysis of 198 cases with bilateral cingulum bundle lesions (Ballantine et al., 1987) pointed to lasting improvements in approximately half of those treated for obsessive compulsive disorders (OCD)”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Ballantine et al., 1987

  • Cingulotomy outcomes are slightly better for anxiety disorders and affective disorders, including depression, than for OCD.

    “with slightly better outcomes for anxiety disorders and affective disorders, including depression (Ballantine et al., 1987; Shields et al., 2008).”

    From The cingulum bundle: Anatomy, function, and dysfunction (2018) · cites this paper as Ballantine et al., 1987

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ballantine, H. T., Bouckoms, A. J., Thomas, E. K., & Giriunas, I. E.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Ballantine, H.Thomas
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1987-07
Volume
22
Issue
7
Pages
807-819
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064542914
Cited by
328
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
mental illness, mood disorders, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, schizophrenia, personality disorders, treatment outcomes, long-term follow-up, violent behavior, suicide risk, refractory psychiatric disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Mental Disorders, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Disorders, Psychomotor Performance, Schizophrenia, Social Adjustment, Stereotaxic Techniques, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review