The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mental fatigue, motivation and action monitoring
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9 · Cited by 5,055 · cited 2×
“Out of range artefacts wererejectedand eye movementartefacts were corrected,using theGratton and Coles method ( Gratton et al., 1983 ).”
MethodHolroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2002) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.109.4.679 · Cited by 4,027
MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.288.5472.1835 · Cited by 3,666
Anterior Cingulate Cortex, Error Detection, and the Online Monitoring of Performance
Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5364.747 · Cited by 3,273
Multiple reward signals in the brain
Schultz, W. (2000) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35044563 · Cited by 1,303
The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies
VANVEEN, V, & CARTER, C. (2002) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00930-7 · Cited by 1,258 · cited 3×
“These findings are corroborated with results from fMRI studies (Carter et al., 1998; Kiehl et al., 2000; Van Veen and Carter, 2002a).”
BackgroundResultAnterior Cingulate Cortex and Response Conflict: Effects of Frequency, Inhibition and Errors
Braver, T. S. (2001) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/11.9.825 · Cited by 1,016
Short-term mobilization of processing resources is revealed in the event-related potential
Falkenstein, M., Hoormann, J., Hohnsbein, J., & Kleinsorge, T. (2003) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.00109 · Cited by 138
Cited by
Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: a meta-analysis
Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0019486 · Cited by 2,265
An opportunity cost model of subjective effort and task performance
Kurzban, R., Duckworth, A., Kable, J. W., & Myers, J. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12003196 · Cited by 1,381
Motivation and cognitive control: from behavior to neural mechanism
Botvinick, M., & Braver, T. (2015) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015044 · Cited by 909
The Effects of Mental Fatigue on Physical Performance: A Systematic Review
Van Cutsem, J., Marcora, S., De Pauw, K., Bailey, S., Meeusen, R., & Roelands, B. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0672-0 · Cited by 924
Emotional foundations of cognitive control
Inzlicht, M., Bartholow, B. D., & Hirsh, J. B. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.004 · Cited by 542
Metadata
- Authors
- Boksem, M. A. S., Meijman, T. F., & Lorist, M. M.
- Venue
- Biological Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-132
- ISSN
- 0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2162571494
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 2.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.