Cited by 961Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesBehavioral Health and InterventionsNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 218 of the 221 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 178 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Motivation and Cognitive Control: From Behavior to Neural Mechanism

Open access
Botvinick, Matthew, Braver, Todd·2015·Annual Review of Psychology

Abstract

Research on cognitive control and executive function has long recognized the relevance of motivational factors. Recently, however, the topic has come increasingly to center stage, with a surge of new studies examining the interface of motivation and cognitive control. In the present article we survey research situated at this interface, considering work from cognitive and social psychology and behavioral economics, but with a particular focus on neuroscience research. We organize existing findings into three core areas, considering them in the light of currently vying theoretical perspectives. Based on the accumulated evidence, we advocate for a view of control function that treats it as a domain of reward-based decision making. More broadly, we argue that neuroscientific evidence plays a critical role in understanding the mechanisms by which motivation and cognitive control interact. Opportunities for further cross-fertilization between behavioral and neuroscientific research are highlighted.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This review synthesizes behavioral and neuroscience research on how motivation shapes cognitive control, arguing that control is best understood as a form of reward-based decision making. It contends that neuroscience is essential for grounding the constructs of reward and effort and for explaining incentive effects, control dynamics, and effort costs.

Key findings

  • Incentives generally improve executive control across selective attention, memory, response inhibition, task switching, and working memory; for example, Padmala & Pessoa’s reward cue ($20 vs. $00) reduced Stroop-like interference and facilitation effects. However, boundary conditions exist: very small payments can undermine performance, very large incentives can produce “choking under pressure,” and extrinsic rewards may reduce intrinsic motivation.
  • Cognitive control carries an intrinsic cost: participants prefer lower-demand tasks and require substantially higher pay to choose high-demand tasks; neural signals in ventral striatum, ACC, and dorsolateral PFC track effort discounting and demand avoidance.
  • Depletion effects are increasingly interpreted motivationally rather than as glucose or resource depletion; incentives can restore performance and error-related neural signals, and neural data show changes in reward and control networks rather than global metabolic decline.
  • The review favors reward-based models over force-field and limited-resource accounts, proposing interactions between reward-related regions (ventromedial/orbitofrontal cortex, ventral striatum, amygdala, midbrain dopamine) and control-related regions (lateral PFC, ACC, parietal cortex, insula), with ACC and dopamine as key interfaces.

Methods

  • Narrative, selective review rather than a primary empirical study; it synthesizes cognitive psychology, social/personality psychology, behavioral economics, and neuroscience literatures.
  • Organizes evidence under three headings: the incentive–performance relationship, temporal dynamics of control, and the cost of control; compares force-field, limited-resource, and reward-based decision-making theories.
  • Draws on cited behavioral, fMRI, EEG, primate neurophysiology, and pharmacological studies; no new data, systematic search, or meta-analysis are reported.

Limitations

  • The authors state that neuroscientific work on motivation and control is still early-stage, many mechanistic details remain unresolved, and depletion-related neural findings are sparse and inconsistent; reward and effort constructs also face circularity and measurement problems.
  • Evident from the text: the review is selective and narrative, with no formal meta-analysis or systematic inclusion criteria; conclusions rely on cited studies rather than new experiments, and some figures/references appear incomplete in the provided text.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015044

Cites

218 of 218 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 178 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    Lynn et al. (2012) found that participants reported an increased urge to quit immediately after difficult, conflict-inducing trials.

    “Lynn et al. (2012) found that experimental participants performing Stroop and working-memory tasks reported an increase in the urge to quit immediately following difficult, conflict-inducing trials.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Lynn et al. 2012
  • Premisecitation

    The intensity and direction of control fluctuate over time, both in response to task details and independently of them.

    “the intensity and direction of control tend to vary over time, both in response to the details of the task and independent of them”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Eichele et al. 2008
    • cites Esterman et al. 2013
    • cites Weissman et al. 2006
  • Premisecitation

    Conflict adjustment effects increase following performance-contingent monetary rewards and punishments.

    “Conflict adjustment effects have also been observed to increase in size following performance-contingent monetary rewards”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Braem et al. 2012
    • cites St ürmer et al. 2011
    • cites Braem et al. 2013
  • Premisecitation

    Schmeichel (2007) found that an attention-distraction group showed reduced working memory capacity relative to a control group.

    “The attention-distraction group showed a subsequent reduction in measured working memory capacity, relative to the control group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schmeichel 2007
  • Premisecitation

    Cognitive effort can be driven by internal sources of motivation such as need for cognition or achievement motivation.

    “the investment of cognitive effort can be driven by internal sources of motivation”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Cacioppo et al. 1996
    • cites Deci & Ryan 2000
    • cites Nicholls 1984
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 36
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 33
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Very small or very large incentives can paradoxically undermine performance; small rewards may insult, and very large incentives can cause choking under pressure.

    “paradoxical effects can arise when incentive magnitude becomes either very small or very large.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gneezy & Rustichini 2000
    • cites Ariely et al. 2009
    • cites Baumeister 1984
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Conflict may act as an aversive signal prompting task avoidance.

    “the proposal that conflict may act as an aversive signal prompting task avoidance”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Botvinick 2007
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Some research suggests an undermining effect in which extrinsic rewards reduce intrinsic motivation for a task.

    “some research has suggested the existence of an undermining effect, according to which the introduction of extrinsic (e.g., monetary) rewards can reduce the intrinsic motivation associated with a task”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Murayama et al. 2010
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Cognitive control is motivated; its function is driven by desires and goals.

    “Control is motivated.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Inzlicht and colleagues (2014) proposed that self-control exertion leads to motivated switching of task priorities, making mental work more aversive and mental leisure more attractive.

    “self-control exertion at Time 1 leads to the motivated switching of task priorities, wherein mental work becomes increasingly aversive, making mental leisure increasingly attractive”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Inzlicht et al. 2014
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationnone given

    Neuroscientific evidence is essential for understanding how motivation and cognitive control interact.

    “we argue that neuroscientific evidence plays a critical role in understanding the mechanisms by which motivation and cognitive control interact.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Incentives improve performance primarily when adjustments in control intensity or direction are efficacious; this excludes settings where task complexity exceeds skill or basic information-processing capacity.

    “incentives are liable to trigger performance improvements primarily in task settings where adjustments in the intensity or direction of control tend to be efficacious”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Camerer & Hogarth 1999
    • cites Bonner et al. 2000
    • cites Awasthi & Pratt 1990
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The ego depletion effect is the finding that engaging in a control-demanding activity leads to reduced persistence or poorer performance on a subsequent task compared to a less demanding prior activity.

    “engagement in a control-demanding activity is followed by reduced persistence and/or poorer performance on a second task, compared to when that second task is preceded by a less demanding activity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Hagger et al. 2010
    • cites Muraven & Baumeister 2000
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    On a trial-to-trial timescale, control varies with performance monitoring; error adaptation increases under performance-contingent reward.

    “control is known to vary in response to ongoing performance monitoring.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites St ürmer et al. 2011
    • cites Boksem et al. 2006
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The relationship between incentives and control is not inviolable; boundary conditions exist.

    “Although all of these studies have observed enhancements in control with increasing incentives, it is important to note that this relationship is not inviolable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Camerer & Hogarth 1999
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Traditionally, depletion effects are explained as a structural constraint on sustained cognitive control.

    “Traditionally, these types of depletion effects have been explained in terms of a structural constraint on the capacity for sustained cognitive control”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Baumeister et al. 1998
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Baumeister and colleagues proposed that the resource underlying behavioral depletion effects is blood glucose.

    “Baumeister and colleagues (Gailliot et al. 2007, Masicampo & Baumeister 2008) have proposed that the resource underlying behavioral depletion effects and related phenomena is in fact blood glucose.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gailliot et al. 2007
    • cites Masicampo & Baumeister 2008
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    CET does not explicitly specify the basis for strategy choice.

    “CET does not explicitly specify the basis for strategy choice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisenone given

    In force-field accounts, cognitive actions result from equilibrium being reached between driving and restraining forces.

    “In forcefield accounts, as represented by CET, cognitive actions are the result of equilibrium being reached between driving and restraining forces.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Resources in this abstract guise have been decried as theoretical soup stones that do no real theoretical work.

    “resources have been decried as theoretical”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Hockey 1997
    • cites Inzlicht et al. 2014
    • cites Kurzban et al. 2013
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisereasoning

    Such theories introduce effort as a variable mediating between incentives and performance.

    “such theories introduce effort as a variable mediating between incentives and performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    Reward-based theories are founded on the idea that behavioral choices reflect comparisons of reward or value.

    “Reward-based theories are founded on the idea that behavioral choices reflect comparisons of reward or value.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Initial evidence suggested glucose administration reverses the depletion effect, but subsequent findings have given rise to controversy.

    “Some initial evidence for the role of glucose was provided in studies that found glucose administration reversed the depletion effect”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gailliot et al. 2007
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Reward-based models view control as involving ongoing decisions aimed at maximizing expected utility.

    “This approach views the operation of the control as involving an ongoing series of decisions, each aimed at maximizing expected utility.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dayan 2012
    • cites Shenhav et al. 2013
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Decision making weighs both the anticipated rewards and anticipated costs of specific control operations.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    In many settings, the assumed answer is that one may infer values from the individual's overt choices.

    “In many settings, the answer assumed is that one may infer such values from the individual's overt choices.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Effort plays two mediating roles: it determines the quality of performance and scales the cost associated with task engagement.

    “effort actually plays not one but two mediating roles.First, it determines the quality of performance (and thus, indirectly, the performance-dependent income), and second, it scales the cost associated with task engagement.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These autonomic measures are necessarily indirect, serving only as potential biomarkers or reporter variables indicating the level of effort; they cannot mediate the relationship between incentives and performance.

    “These measures are necessarily indirect, serving only as potential biomarkers or reporter variables indicating the level of effort; they clearly cannot mediate the relationship between incentives and performance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Effort is purported to explain the relationship between incentives and performance, but it is also measured or inferred from the observed relationship between these two.

    “Effort is purported to explain the relationship between incentives and performance, but it is also measured or inferred from the observed relationship between these two.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    Force-field models conceptualize action as resulting from forces that attract toward or impede progress toward a goal.

    “The basic idea is to conceptualize action as the result of forces, akin to physical forces, that attract an individual toward a goal or else impede progress toward that goal.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Atkinson & Birch 1978
    • cites Berridge 2004
    • cites Hull 1943
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    In this setting, the optimal amount of effort to invest maximizes net reward, i.e., income from successful task performance less the cost of effort.

    “the optimal amount of effort to invest is the one that maximizes net reward, i.e., the”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Padoa-Schioppa argued that values cannot be measured independently of choice based on behavior alone, making the assertion that choices maximize values circular; neural computation of values breaks this circularity.

    “based on behavior alone, values cannot be measured independently of choice.Consequently, the assertion that choices maximize values is intrinsically circular.The observation that values are actually computed in the brain essentially breaks this circularity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Padoa-Schioppa 2011
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Cognitive control may be inherently costly or aversive.

    “The idea that cognitive control may be inherently costly or aversive has cropped up not only in the depletion literature but also in connection with other topics”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Taylor 1981
    • cites Bonner & Sprinkle 2002
    • cites Smith & Walker 1993
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Shenhav et al. (2013) proposed the expected value of control (EVC) theory, defining EVC as cumulative expected reward from directing control minus expected cost, and proposing that control decisions optimize EVC.

    “Shenhav et al. (2013) presented a theory centering on the concept of the expected value of control (EVC).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shenhav et al. 2013
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If neuroscience offers a way to ground otherwise circular notions of reward and effort, then the role of neuroscience assumes central importance in the study of motivation and cognitive control.

    “If these assertions are correct, if neuroscience offers a way to ground otherwise circular notions of reward and effort, then the role of neuroscience assumes central importance in the study of motivation and cognitive control.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    A different set of regions, including ventromedial frontal and medial parietal cortices, declines in activity during control-demanding tasks and is sometimes referred to as the default mode or task-negative network.

    “A different set of regions, including the ventromedial frontal and medial parietal cortices, has been widely reported to decline in activity during performance of control-demanding tasks and has thus sometimes been referred to as the default mode or task-negative network”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Buckner et al. 2008
    • cites Fox et al. 2005
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Jimura et al. (2010) found selective behavioral performance enhancements and individual differences effects of motivational context, which were statistically mediated by a shift in lateral PFC activity dynamics from a transient mode to a sustained and anticipatory mode.

    “Jimura et al. (2010) found selective behavioral performance enhancements and individual differences effects of motivational context, which were statistically mediated by a shift in lateral PFC activity dynamics from a transient mode (activated late in the trial, during the response period) to a sustained and anticipatory mode (activated both tonically and early in the trial during working memory”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Jimura et al. 2010
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    A voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping study by Gläscher and colleagues identified a region within medial PFC associated with performance in both reward and cognitive control tasks; the investigators proposed that this region might mediate linking reward and control networks.

    “a voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping study by Gläscher and colleagues (2012) identified a region within medial PFC associated with performance in both reward and cognitive control tasks; the investigators proposed that this region might play a mediating role in linking reward and control networks.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gläscher et al. 2012
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Strong direct connectivity exists between ventromedial frontal areas involved in reward processing and lateral PFC areas implicated in control, alongside a pathway connecting the two areas via the caudate nucleus.

    “strong direct connectivity exists between ventromedial frontal areas involved in reward processing and lateral PFC areas strongly implicated in control (Barbas & Pandya 1989, Cavada et al. 2000), alongside a pathway connecting the two areas via the caudate nucleus (Alexander et al. 1986).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Barbas & Pandya 1989
    • cites Cavada et al. 2000
    • cites Alexander et al. 1986
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    DA has a range of effects on cellular physiology, such as altering neuronal excitability and enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio.

    “DA is known to have a range of effects on cellular physiology, such as altering neuronal excitability (Henze et al. 2000, Nicola et al. 2000) and enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio (Durstewitz & Seamans 2008, Thurley et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Henze et al. 2000
    • cites Nicola et al. 2000
    • cites Durstewitz & Seamans 2008
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Rowe et al. (2008) found that when task events signaled an increasing opportunity for reward on one dimension, rising ACC activity was observed along with a greater behavioral bias toward the relevant target dimension, and the increase in ACC activity was accompanied by a shift in connectivity between dorsolateral PFC and other PFC regions.

    “When task events signaled an increasing opportunity for reward on one dimension, rising ACC activity was observed along with a greater behavioral bias toward the relevant target dimension.Moreover, the increase in ACC activity was accompanied by a shift in connectivity between the dorsolateral PFC and other PFC regions associated with each dimension”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Rowe et al. 2008
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    Motivational context can exert a sustained influence on PFC activity and incentives can affect cognitive control in both a trial-by-trial and a contextual (block-based) manner.

    “This suggests that motivational context can exert a sustained influence on PFC activity and that incentives can affect cognitive control in both a trial-by-trial and a contextual (block-based) manner.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisecitation

    The lateral PFC may house a discrete set of hierarchically organized subregions subserving different levels of control function.

    “the lateral PFC may house a discrete set of hierarchically organized subregions, subserving different levels of control function”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Badre 2008
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The dorsal ACC has long been known to play a critical role in monitoring action selection and task performance as well as in triggering compensatory adjustments in cognitive control.

    “This structure has long been known to play a critical role in monitoring action selection and task performance as well as in triggering compensatory adjustments in cognitive control”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shenhav et al. 2013
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

    Premisereasoning

    A number of investigators have proposed that the ACC might play a central role in bridging between reward and control processing.

    “a number of investigators have proposed that the ACC might play a central role in bridging between reward and control processing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Etzel and colleagues used fMRI pattern classification to demonstrate that task rules could be decoded more effectively on incentive trials compared to intermixed nonincentive trials, and patterns associated with each task were more distinct, suggesting incentives induced a sharpening of task representations.

    “Etzel and colleagues ( J.A. Etzel, M.W. Cole, J.M. Zacks, K.N.Kay & T.S. Braver, manuscript submitted) used fMRI pattern classification methods to demonstrate that task rules could be decoded more effectively on incentive trials compared to intermixed nonincentive trials.Moreover, the patterns of activity associated with each task were more distinct from each other, which suggests that incentives”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Etzel et al., manuscript submitted
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    In Leon & Shadlen (1999), dorsolateral PFC neurons coding for specific locations displayed sustained delay-period activity, and on high-reward trials this activity was selectively enhanced.

    “neurons in dorsolateral PFC that code for specific locations were found to display sustained activity over the delay, consistent with a role in working memory maintenance.More importantly, on trials in which large rewards were offered for accurate recall, this delay-period activity was selectively enhanced.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Leon & Shadlen 1999
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true.

    Premisecitation

    Several investigators have suggested that a corresponding hierarchy resides within the medial PFC, which serves to regulate the lateral hierarchy based on motivational inputs.

    “several investigators have suggested that a corresponding hierarchy resides within the medial PFC, which serves to regulate the lateral hierarchy based on motivational inputs”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Holroyd & Yeung 2012
    • cites Kouneiher et al. 2009
    • cites O'Reilly 2010
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    DA may sharpen cortical tuning, which could heighten perceptual sensitivity and enhance top-down attentional or control signals.

    “DA may sharpen cortical tuning (Gamo & Arnsten 2011), which could have the effect of heightening perceptual sensitivity and enhancing top-down attentional or control signals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gamo & Arnsten 2011
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Shenhav and colleagues propose that the dorsal ACC computes the expected value of control, using this as a basis for selecting among candidate control functions, which are then implemented in other sectors of the lateral PFC.

    “Shenhav and colleagues (2013), who propose that the dorsal ACC computes the expected value of control, as defined previously, using this as a basis for selecting among candidate control functions, which are then implemented in other sectors of the lateral PFC.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shenhav et al. 2013
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Padmala & Pessoa (2011) found that incentive cues occurring before the imperative stimulus triggered activity in core components of the reward network and in lateral frontoparietal components of the control network, and these two sets of regions showed increased functional connectivity.

    “incentive cues occurring before the imperative stimulus were found to trigger activity in core components of the reward network (dopaminergic midbrain, caudate/putamen, and nucleus accumbens) as well as in lateral frontoparietal components of the control network.More strikingly, during the same period these two sets of regions also showed increased functional connectivity”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Padmala & Pessoa 2011
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    The vast majority of neuroscientific research on the relationship between motivation and control adopts a reward-based perspective, viewing control operations as guided by a utility-maximization principle.

    “The vast majority of neuroscientific research on the relationship between motivation and control adopts what we have termed the reward-based perspective, viewing control operations as guided by a utility-maximization principle.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Experimental support for this account has been provided in studies showing that during an oddball target-discrimination task, the long-run average reward value had a distinct influence on task reaction times and that this effect is modulated by pharmacological manipulation of DA levels.

    “Experimental support for this account has been provided in studies showing that during an oddball targetdiscrimination task, the long-run average reward value (across minute timescales) had a distinct influence on task reaction times (Guitart-Masip et al. 2011) and that this effect is modulated by pharmacological manipulation of DA levels (Beierholm et al. 2013).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Guitart-Masip et al. 2011
    • cites Beierholm et al. 2013
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

    Premisenone given

    N2 is widely interpreted as an ERP correlate of conflict detection.

    “which is widely interpreted as an ERP correlate of conflict detection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The default mode network is a set of regions including ventromedial PFC and posterior cingulate cortex that tends to be more active at rest.

    “Because the latter network tends to become more active when the subject is at rest, i.e., not engaged in effortful, controlled information processing, it is often referred to as the default mode network (Buckner et al. 2008).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Buckner et al. 2008
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Tonic DA release is implicated in the vigor of responding, and tonic DA encodes the long-run average reward rate of the environment.

    “theoretical work implicating tonic DA release in the vigor (i.e., intensity, speed) of responding (Niv et al. 2007).Under this account, tonic DA encodes the long-run average reward rate of the environment.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Niv et al. 2007
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Esposito et al. (2014) found that inducing mental exhaustion from sustained performance of a novel task led to increased resting-state fluctuations in the default mode network and decreased activation of the frontoparietal executive network.

    “Esposito and colleagues (2014), who found that inducing mental exhaustion-resulting from sustained performance of a novel task-led to both increased activity (resting-state fluctuations) in the default mode network and decreased activation of the frontoparietal executive network.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Esposito et al. (2014)
    • The authors state this as an assumption: Depletion effects involve a wholesale reduction in the vigor of cognitive control, beyond a reduction in performance monitoring following sustained cognitive exertion.
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationcitation

    These results were interpreted as indicating an overmotivation effect, with an imbalance between activation in subcortical reward-related versus prefrontal cognitive regions leading toward a shift from more goal-directed to habitual guidance of behavior.

    “These results were interpreted as indicating an overmotivation effect, with an imbalance between activation in subcortical (reward-related) versus prefrontal (cognitive) regions leading toward a shift from more goal-directed to habitual guidance of behavior”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mobbs et al. 2009
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationcitation

    The authors of Wagner et al. (2013) interpret this as reflecting reduced top-down control of reward representations in orbitofrontal cortex.

    “The authors interpret this finding as reflecting a reduction in top-down control of reward representations in orbitofrontal cortex.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Wagner et al. (2013)
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Mobbs et al. (2009) found that compared to low-incentive trials, high-incentive trials were associated with both poorer performance and increased activity in the DA midbrain and dorsal striatum, and participants showing the strongest responses in these regions also showed the largest incentive-linked performance decrements.

    “Compared to low-incentive trials, high-incentive trials were associated with both poorer performance and increased activity in the DA midbrain and dorsal striatum.Moreover, these effects were linked, in that participants showing the strongest responses in these regions also showed the largest incentive-linked performance decrements.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mobbs et al. 2009
  • Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Braver and colleagues proposed a theory of dual mechanisms of control, under which proactive control processes reflect context-triggered updating and active maintenance of task goals in lateral PFC and are dependent upon phasic and tonic DA modulation of PFC neuronal activity.

    “Braver and colleagues (Braver 2012, Braver et al. 2007) proposed a theory of dual mechanisms of control, under which proactive control processes reflect context-triggered updating and active maintenance of task goals in lateral PFC and are dependent upon phasic and tonic DA modulation of PFC neuronal activity.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Braver 2012
    • cites Braver et al. 2007
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisenone given

    Motivation impacts the dynamics of cognitive control on both short timescales, through performance monitoring, and longer timescales, as in the ego-depletion effect.

    “At the behavioral level, motivation impacts the dynamics of cognitive control on both short timescales, through performance monitoring, and longer timescales, as in the ego-depletion effect.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The exertion of control carries an intrinsic subjective cost that plays an important role in shaping control function.

    “A second general conclusion from the available neuroscientific data, again consistent with reward-based behavioral models, is that the exertion of control carries an intrinsic subjective cost and that this cost plays an important role in shaping control function.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Regulatory fit theory suggests that a promotion focus should produce better performance when incentives are framed as monetary gain than as avoidance of loss, whereas a prevention focus should produce the converse pattern.

    “which suggests that a promotion focus (a focus on advancement and accomplishment) should produce better performance when incentives are framed in terms of monetary gain than when they are framed in terms of the avoidance of loss, whereas a prevention focus (a focus on safety and security) should produce the converse pattern.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Higgins 2000
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    The circuitry underlying cognitive effort-based decision making overlaps with that for physical effort but is partially distinctive.

    “Initial studies have suggested that the circuitry underlying cognitive effort-based decision making overlaps with that relating to physical effort, but it is also partially distinctive (see Schmidt et al. 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Schmidt et al. 2012
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Rising incentives make it worth it to increase control strength and accept greater subjective cost; performance monitoring tracks the relationship between control invested and payoff.

    “rising incentives can be understood as making it”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Expected value of control is the difference between rewards expected from mobilizing control with a particular direction and intensity and the inherent cost of that mobilization.

    “which is the difference between (a) the rewards expected from mobilizing control with a particular direction and intensity and (b) the inherent cost associated with this mobilization.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shenhav et al. (2013)
  • It may state two separate claims as one.

    Premisecitation

    Croxson et al. (2009) observed integration between reward and effort demands in dorsal ACC, alongside signals correlating with net value in ventral striatum and midbrain.

    “Croxson and colleagues (2009) observed an analogous integration between reward and effort demands in dorsal ACC, alongside signals correlating with net value in both ventral striatum and midbrain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Croxson et al. (2009)
  • Probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Shenhav et al. (2013) proposed that a core function of dorsal ACC is to compute the expected value of control.

    “Shenhav et al. (2013), focusing specifically on the dorsal ACC, proposed that a core function of this structure is to compute the expected value of control”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Shenhav et al. (2013)
63 of 63
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Decision making weighs both the anticipated rewards and anticipated costs of specific control operations.

    “An important assumption that enters into most reward-based models is that decision making weighs both the anticipated rewards and anticipated costs of specific control operations.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Parsimony is a legitimate criterion for comparing psychological theories.

    “claims based upon parsimony cannot withstand contrary empirical evidence.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Circularity in explaining choice via reward is a theoretical problem that must be resolved.

    “There is an obvious risk of circularity here: Choice is explained based on reward, but reward is inferred from choice.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Neural correlates of effort can serve as independent measures of effort that are dissociable from performance.

    “If neural correlates of effort can be identified, this provides a way out of the potential circularity of effort-based explanation.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Depletion effects involve a wholesale reduction in the vigor of cognitive control, beyond a reduction in performance monitoring following sustained cognitive exertion.

    “Depletion effects, however, are postulated to involve more than a reduction in performance monitoring following sustained cognitive exertion: They are understood to involve a wholesale reduction in the vigor of cognitive control.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modern theories of motivation describe motivational states as the output of a computation where expected value of an action is weighed against anticipated costs (energetic, opportunity, hedonic).

    “Consequently, modern theories of motivation increasingly describe motivational states as the output of a computation (calculation), where the expected value of an action is weighed against anticipated costs. These include energetic costs, as all goal pursuit will require the expenditure of metabolic energy, opportunity costs, as the pursuit of one goal might block progress towards another, hedonic”

    From Motivation in the Service of Allostasis: The Role of Anterior Mid-Cingulate Cortex (2019) · cites this paper as Botvinick and Braver, 2015

    The Reward-Based Models section describes decisions about cognitive control as weighing anticipated rewards against anticipated costs, including effort costs. It does not establish the claim’s specific list of metabolic-energy, opportunity, and hedonic costs, or apply that list to goal pursuit generally (page numbers unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies have provided evidence for a widespread influence of incentive reward on executive functioning and cognitive control, which is also observed on the level of attentional control.

    “In short, studies have provided evidence for a widespread influence of incentive reward on executive functioning and, more broadly, cognitive control which is also observed on the level of attentional control (Botvinick & Braver, 2015).”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Botvinick & Braver, 2015

  • An acute or chronic impairment in explaining-away prediction errors represents a form of cognitive stress and will be registered by higher model levels involved in monitoring cognitive performance.

    “An acute or chronic impairment in explaining-away prediction errors represents a form of “cognitive stress” and will be registered by higher model levels on the cognitive hierarchy involved in monitoring the cognitive performance of the lower levels of the internal model (85).”
  • A persistent impairment of minimizing prediction errors in a specific processing stream is likely registered by higher systems for self-monitoring and creates the continuing experience of an unpredictable environment of bewildering complexity.

    “As alluded to above, a persistent impairment of minimizing prediction errors in a specific processing stream is likely registered by higher systems for self-monitoring (85) and creates the continuing experience of an unpredictable environment of bewildering complexity.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 221 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Atkinson JW, 1978, An Introduction to Motivation
  2. Awasthi V, 1990, Account. Rev., 65, 797
  3. Tops M, 2004, Gedrag Organ., 17, 32

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Botvinick, M., & Braver, T.
Affiliations
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Corresponding author
Botvinick, Matthew
Venue
Annual Review of Psychology
Published
2015-01-03
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
83-113
ISSN
  • 0066-4308 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2085
OpenAlex
W2166756161
Cited by
909
References
221
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 97 · 2018: 101 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 21
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (R13AG042291)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R37MH066078, R21MH097260, R01MH098815, R37 MH0660708)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
motivation, cognitive control, executive function, reward-based decision-making, neural mechanisms, behavioral economics, social psychology, cognitive psychology, control functions
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Humans, Motivation, Reward, Cerebrum, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review