Cited by 43Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesStress Responses and CortisolNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Depressed mood and emotional responding

Sloan, Denise M., Sandt, Arthur R.·2010·Biological Psychology

Abstract

The current study examined emotional responding in a sample of 57 college students who varied in depression symptom scores. Participants viewed pleasant, unpleasant and neutral emotional-eliciting pictures. Response measures included autonomic activity, subjective report of emotion, eyeblink startle reflex, and postauricular reflex. Findings indicated that greater depression symptoms predicted blunted responding with the postauricular reflex and eyeblink startle reflex measures. However, greater depression symptoms were not associated with blunted or heightened responding as indexed by the autonomic reactivity and self-report measures. Taken together, these results suggest that depression may be associated with both appetitive and defensive responding deficits, which has important implications for emotional responding. The findings underscore the importance of using multiple measures when investigating emotional responding associated with depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.04.004

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Depression is associated with reduced physiological reactivity to positive stimuli.

    “Depression, associated with less intense emotions, has also consistently been associated with reduced physiological reactivity to positive stimuli (Bylsma et al., 2008; Sloan and Sandt, 2010)”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Sloan and Sandt, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sloan, D. M., & Sandt, A. R.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Sloan, Denise M.
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-05
Volume
84
Issue
2
Pages
368-374
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998786456
Cited by
43
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
depression, emotional responses, blunted affect, defensive responding, autonomic reactivity, emotional pictures, university students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Affect, Blinking, Depression, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Photic Stimulation, Psychophysics, Self Concept, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review