The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technoeconomic analysis of five microalgae-to-biofuels processes of varying complexity
Abstract
The economics surrounding five algae-to-fuels process scenarios were examined. The different processes modeled were as follows: an open pond producing either triacylglycerides (TAG) or free fatty acid methyl ester (FAME), a solar-lit photobioreactor producing either FAME or free fatty acids (FFA), and a light emitting diode irradiated (LED-lighted) photobioreactor producing TAG. These processes were chosen to represent both classical and esoteric approaches presented in the open literature. Viable (or suggested) processing techniques to liberate and purify (and convert) the microalgal triacylglycerides were then modeled to accompany each growth option. The investment and cost per kg of fuel or fuel precursor for each process was determined. The open pond produced TAG at ∼$7.50/kg, while the process using the LED-lit photobioreactor produced TAG at ∼$33/kg. The scenario containing the solar-lit photobioreactor produced FAME at ∼$25/kg, while the open pond produced FAME at ∼$4/kg. The scenario containing the solar-lit photobioreactor produced FFA at ∼$29/kg. The open pond scenarios appear to be closest to the $1/kg pricepoint at this time, and thus are the most viable economic options. Future technological advancements that reduce the cost of bioreactor vessels, LED lighting, and solvent recovery, may reduce the oil production costs of these scenarios to a more attractive level.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The average price of algae biodiesel grown in a photobioreactor is $4.93, which is 66% more than in an open-pond system that is $2.97 L -1 .”
From The Perspective of Large-Scale Production of Algae Biodiesel (2020) · cites this paper as [78]
Citations
Cites
Chisti, Y. (2007) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.02.001 · Cited by 9,524
Recovery of microalgal biomass and metabolites: Process options and economics
Molina Grima, E., Belarbi, E.-H., Acién Fernández, F. G., Robles Medina, A., & Chisti, Y. (2003) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/s0734-9750(02)00050-2 · Cited by 2,286
Chen, C.-Y., Yeh, K.-L., Aisyah, R., Lee, D.-J., & Chang, J.-S. (2011) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.159 · Cited by 1,860
Sheehan, J., Dunahay, T., Benemann, J., & Roessler, P. (1998) · doi:10.2172/15003040 · Cited by 1,753
Theory of electroporation: A review
Weaver, J. C., & Chizmadzhev, Y. A. (1996) · Bioelectrochemistry and Bioenergetics · doi:10.1016/s0302-4598(96)05062-3 · Cited by 1,639
Life-Cycle Assessment of Biodiesel Production from Microalgae
Lardon, L., Hélias, A., Sialve, B., Steyer, J.-P., & Bernard, O. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es900705j · Cited by 1,528
The Potential of Sustainable Algal Biofuel Production Using Wastewater Resources
Pittman, J. K., Dean, A. P., & Osundeko, O. (2011) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.035 · Cited by 1,526
Williams, P. J. L. B., & Laurens, L. M. L. (2010) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/b924978h · Cited by 1,223
Environmental Life Cycle Comparison of Algae to Other Bioenergy Feedstocks
Clarens, A. F., Resurreccion, E. P., White, M. A., & Colosi, L. M. (2010) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es902838n · Cited by 1,118
Product and Process Design Principles: Synthesis, Analysis and Evaluation
Seider, W. D., Seader, J. D., Lewin, D. R., & Widagdo, S. (2016) · Cited by 1,094
Flagged first, then by citations
5 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Eckelberry, N., Eckelberry, T.R., 2009. Algae growth system for oil production. US Pat. Appl. 2009/0029445. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, Virginia, pp. 7.
- Eckelberry, N., Uematsu, H., 2001. Apparatus for generating microbubbles while mixing an additive fluid with a mainstream liquid. US Pat. Appl. 2001/0003291. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, Virginia, pp. 9.
- Machacek, M.T., Smith, T.G., 2009. Continuous algal biodiesel production facility. US Patent Appl. 2009/0071064. United States Patent and Trademark Office Alexandria, Virginia, pp. 34.
- Willson, B., 2008. Diffuse light extended surface area water-supported photobioreactor. US Patent Appl. 2008/0160591. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, Virginia, pp. 27.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Exploiting diversity and synthetic biology for the production of algal biofuels
Georgianna, D. R., & Mayfield, S. P. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11479 · Cited by 725
A review of the harvesting of micro-algae for biofuel production
Milledge, J. J., & Heaven, S. (2012) · Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology · doi:10.1007/s11157-012-9301-z · Cited by 679
Microalgae Harvesting Techniques: A Review
Singh, G., & Patidar, S. K. (2018) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.010 · Cited by 647
Quinn, J. C., & Davis, R. E. (2014) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.075 · Cited by 498
Conversion of Microalgae to Biofuel
Suali, E., & Sarbatly, R. (2012) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.047 · Cited by 456
Metadata
- Authors
- Amer, L., Adhikari, B., & Pellegrino, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pellegrino, John
- Venue
- Bioresource Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-10
- Volume
- 102
- Issue
- 20
- Pages
- 9350-9359
- ISSN
- 0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2167335661
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- ConocoPhillips
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Fuel Technology › Biodiesel Production and Applications
- Keywords
- microalgal biofuels, triglycerides, free fatty acids, open pond cultivation, photobioreactors, fuel production costs, solvent recovery
- MeSH terms
- Anaerobiosis, Centrifugation, Esterification, Hydrolysis, Photochemistry, Bioreactors, Biofuels, Microalgae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
