Cited by 211Algal biology and biofuel productionCoagulation and Flocculation StudiesBiopolymer Synthesis and Applications

Harvesting of microalgae by flocculation with poly (γ-glutamic acid)

Zheng, Hongli, Gao, Zhen, Yin, Jilong, Tang, Xiaohong, Ji, Xiaojun, Huang, He·2012·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

In an effort to search for an efficient and environmentally friendly harvesting method, a commercially available microbial flocculant poly (γ-glutamic acid) (γ-PGA) was used to harvest oleaginous microalgae. Conditions for flocculation of marine Chlorella vulgaris and freshwater Chlorella protothecoides were optimized by response surface methodology (RSM) and determined to be 22.03 mg L(-1) γ-PGA, 0.57 g L(-1) biomass, and 11.56 g L(-1) salinity, and 19.82 mg L(-1) γ-PGA and 0.60 g L(-1) biomass, respectively. Application of the two optimized flocculation methods to Nannochloropsis oculata LICME 002, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, C. vulgaris LICME 001, and Botryococcus braunii LICME 003 gave no less than 90% flocculation efficiency and a concentration factor greater than 20. Micrographs of the harvested microalgal cells showed no damage to cell integrity, and hence no lipid loss during the process. The results show that flocculation with γ-PGA is feasible for harvesting microalgae for biodiesel production.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.086

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Poly-gamma-glutamic acid is produced by Bacillus subtilis.

    “and poly-gamma-glutamic acid (produced by Bacillus subtilis ) [48].”

    From Key Targets for Improving Algal Biofuel Production (2021) · cites this paper as [48]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, H., Gao, Z., Yin, J., Tang, X., Ji, X., & Huang, H.
Affiliations
Nanjing Tech University (CN)
Corresponding author
Huang, He
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
112
Pages
212-220
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009149573
Cited by
211
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (2011CB200904, 2011CB200906)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biopolymer Synthesis and Applications
Keywords
microalgae harvesting, flocculation, poly-γ-glutamic acid, bioflocculant, oleaginous microalgae, Chlorella vulgaris, Chlorella protothecoides, Nannochloropsis oculata, Phaeodactylum tricornutum, Botryococcus braunii, biodiesel feedstock, flocculation efficiency, salinity effects, cell integrity
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Chlorella, Flocculation, Fresh Water, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Polyglutamic Acid, Species Specificity, Time Factors, Biomass, Cell Culture Techniques, Salinity, Microalgae, Aquatic Organisms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review