Cited by 928Algal biology and biofuel productionCoagulation and Flocculation StudiesAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Flocculation as a low-cost method for harvesting microalgae for bulk biomass production

Open access
Vandamme, Dries, Foubert, Imogen, Muylaert, Koenraad·2013·Trends in Biotechnology

Abstract

The global demand for biomass for food, feed, biofuels, and chemical production is expected to increase in the coming decades. Microalgae are a promising new source of biomass that may complement agricultural crops. Production of microalgae has so far been limited to high-value applications. In order to realize large-scale production of microalgae biomass for low-value applications, new low-cost technologies are needed to produce and process microalgae. A major challenge lies in the harvesting of the microalgae, which requires the separation of a low amount of biomass consisting of small individual cells from a large volume of culture medium. Flocculation is seen as a promising low-cost harvesting method. Here, we overview the challenges and possible solutions for flocculating microalgae.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.12.005

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Algal cells display an overall net negative charge on their surface and hence repel each other in suspensions.

    “The principle of flocculation lies in the observation that algal cells display an overall net negative charge on their surface and hence repel each other in suspensions [43].”

    From Key Targets for Improving Algal Biofuel Production (2021) · cites this paper as [43]

    The Additional information section says microalgal suspensions are stabilized by cell-surface charge and that cells have a net negative charge above pH 4–5. Box 2 explains that charged particles repel one another in suspension. The citing sentence omits the paper’s pH condition and presents the negative charge as unqualified. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Four main procedures are typically deployed for separation of biomaterial from the aqueous phase: centrifugation, flocculation, froth flotation, and physical methods.

    “Four main procedures are typically deployed [43,44], namely, centrifugation, flocculation (induced by either chemical and/or biological agents), froth flotation, and physical methods.”

    From Key Targets for Improving Algal Biofuel Production (2021) · cites this paper as [43]

    In “The challenge of harvesting microalgae” (page unavailable), the paper discusses centrifugation and flocculation as harvesting methods. “Physical flocculation methods” and “Flocculation as part of a two-step harvesting process” describe physical techniques, but do not present them as a separate, fourth main procedure. Froth flotation appears only indirectly in references to flotation studies; the paper does not give the claimed four-part classification. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Economic sustainability of commercial-scale production of microalgae biomass is still in doubt, especially cultivation and harvesting.

    “The economic sustainability of the commercial-scale production of microalgae biomass is still in the shadow of doubt, especially the cultivation and harvesting process.”
  • Costs associated with production, harvesting, and processing are a major factor preventing widespread use of microalgae technology.

    “Costs associated with production, harvesting, and processing have been extensively discussed in prior studies and are a major factor preventing the widespread use of this technology [130].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vandamme, D., Foubert, I., & Muylaert, K.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Muylaert, Koenraad
Venue
Trends in Biotechnology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
233-239
ISSN
0167-7799 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010231803
Cited by
928
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 93 · 2018: 88 · 2017: 80 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 6
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in biotechnology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Platform voor marien onderzoek (Vlaams Instituut Voor De Zee) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
microalgae harvesting, flocculation, microalgae cultivation
MeSH terms
Biotechnology, Flocculation, Biomass, Biofuels, Microalgae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review