Cited by 129Biodiesel Production and ApplicationsEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityBioenergy crop production and management

Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production in China

Liang, Sai, Xu, Ming, Zhang, Tianzhu·2013·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

This study aims to evaluate energy, economic, and environmental performances of seven categories of biodiesel feedstocks by using the mixed-unit input-output life cycle assessment method. Various feedstocks have different environmental performances, indicating potential environmental problem-shift. Jatropha seed, castor seed, waste cooking oil, and waste extraction oil are preferred feedstocks for biodiesel production in the short term. Positive net energy yields and positive net economic benefits of biodiesel from these four feedstocks are 2.3-52.0% of their life cycle energy demands and 74.1-448.4% of their economic costs, respectively. Algae are preferred in the long term mainly due to their less arable land demands. Special attention should be paid to potential environmental problems accompanying feedstock choice: freshwater use, ecotoxicity potentials, photochemical oxidation potential, acidification potential and eutrophication potential. Moreover, key processes are identified by sensitivity analysis to direct future technology improvements. Finally, supporting measures are proposed to optimize China's biodiesel development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.037

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Biofuels from cellulosic feedstocks and certain non-grain conventional crops have much less greenhouse gas emissions and air pollutants than fossil fuels on an energy basis.

    “Overall, biofuels from cellulosic feedstocks (e.g., corn residues, switchgrass) and certain non-grain conventional crops (e.g., cassava, Jatropha) have much less greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and air pollutants than fossil fuels (e.g., gasoline, diesel) on an energy basis [6][7][8].”
  • Substituting fossil fuels with biofuels could significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution (e.g., particulate matter).

    “Review on environmental impacts suggested that substituting fossil fuels with biofuels could significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution (e.g., particulate matter).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liang, S., Xu, M., & Zhang, T.
Affiliations
  • State Key Joint Laboratory of Environment Simulation and Pollution Control (CN)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Liang, Sai
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-02
Volume
129
Pages
72-77
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012521877
Cited by
129
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • the Major Program of National Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of China (11&ZD045)
  • the US National Science Foundation (1132581)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biodiesel Production and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
Keywords
biodiesel production, biodiesel feedstock, Jatropha, castor seeds, waste cooking oil, algae, net energy yield, economic feasibility, environmental impact, freshwater use, ecotoxicity, acidification, eutrophication, photooxidation
MeSH terms
China, Plant Extracts, Plant Oils, Seeds, Models, Economic, Biofuels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review