The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anaerobic digestion of microalgal biomass: Challenges, opportunities and research needs
Abstract
Integration of anaerobic digestion (AD) with microalgae processes has become a key topic to support economic and environmental development of this resource. Compared with other substrates, microalgae can be produced close to the plant without the need for arable lands and be fully integrated within a biorefinery. As a limiting step, anaerobic hydrolysis appears to be one of the most challenging steps to reach a positive economic balance and to completely exploit the potential of microalgae for biogas and fertilizers production. This review covers recent investigations dealing with microalgae AD and highlights research opportunities and needs to support the development of this resource. Novel approaches to increase hydrolysis rate, the importance of the reactor design and the noteworthiness of the microbial anaerobic community are addressed. Finally, the integration of AD with microalgae processes and the potential of the carboxylate platform for chemicals and biofuels production are reviewed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As will be mentioned in the biofuels section, a two-reactor system has already been proven with Spirulina biomass being fed to a methanogenic reactor.”
In the citing paper
“Protein-rich diets lead to increased ammonia levels in the culture which inhibit methanogenesis [68].”
In the citing paper
“Spirulina was fed to a reactor populated by Methanocalculus sp. which then also used carbon dioxide and formate to produce a methane content of 92–96% in its biogas [68].”
In the citing paper
“If ammonium inhibition cannot be avoided, then bioaugmentation with Methanoculleus bourgensis has also been shown to increase methane production by 31.3%, but this concept has not been tested in reactors fed with cyanobacterial biomass [68].”
In the citing paper
“However, experiments have been done that verify the use of photosynthetic cyanobacteria as food for a methanogenic reactor.”
In the citing paper
“The tradeoff experienced was that this high relative production of methane was met with low overall biogas production.”
Citations
Cites
Life-Cycle Assessment of Biodiesel Production from Microalgae
Lardon, L., Hélias, A., Sialve, B., Steyer, J.-P., & Bernard, O. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es900705j · Cited by 1,528
Self-citationAmmonia inhibition in anaerobic digestion: A review
Yenigün, O., & Demirel, B. (2013) · Process Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2013.04.012 · Cited by 1,361
Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: A review
Möller, K., & Müller, T. (2012) · Engineering in Life Sciences · doi:10.1002/elsc.201100085 · Cited by 1,339
Anaerobic digestion of microalgae as a necessary step to make microalgal biodiesel sustainable
Sialve, B., Bernet, N., & Bernard, O. (2009) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.03.001 · Cited by 1,187
Self-citationWaste to bioproduct conversion with undefined mixed cultures: the carboxylate platform
Agler, M. T., Wrenn, B. A., Zinder, S. H., & Angenent, L. T. (2010) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.11.006 · Cited by 821
Wang, K., Yin, J., Shen, D., & Li, N. (2014) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.088 · Cited by 607
Life-cycle assessment of microalgae culture coupled to biogas production
Collet, P., Hélias, A., Lardon, L. A., Ras, M., Goy, R.-A., & Steyer, J. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.154 · Cited by 573
Chain elongation in anaerobic reactor microbiomes to recover resources from waste
Spirito, C. M., Richter, H., Rabaey, K., Stams, A. J., & Angenent, L. T. (2014) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2014.01.003 · Cited by 479
Enzymatic cell wall degradation of Chlorella vulgaris and other microalgae for biofuels production
Gerken, H. G., Donohoe, B. S., & Knoshaug, E. P. (2012) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s00425-012-1765-0 · Cited by 454
Experimental study on a coupled process of production and anaerobic digestion of Chlorella vulgaris
Ras, M., Lardon, L. A., Sialve, B., Bernet, N., & Steyer, J. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.146 · Cited by 396
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhen, G., Lü, X., Kato, H., Zhao, Y., & Li, Y. (2016) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.187 · Cited by 876
Narancic, T., Verstichel, S., Reddy Chaganti, S., Morales-Gamez, L., Kenny, S. T., De Wilde, B., Babu Padamati, R., & O’Connor, K. E. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b02963 · Cited by 632
Siddiki, S. Y. A., Mofijur, M., Kumar, P. S., Ahmed, S. F., Inayat, A., Kusumo, F., Badruddin, I. A., Khan, T. M. Y., Nghiem, L. D., Ong, H. C., et al. (2021) · Fuel · doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2021.121782 · Cited by 489
Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) Assay Method for Anaerobic Digestion Research
Filer, J., Ding, H. H., & Chang, S. (2019) · Water · doi:10.3390/w11050921 · Cited by 402
Algal Biomass Valorization for Biofuel Production and Carbon Sequestration: A Review
Sarwer, A., Hamed, S. M., Osman, A. I., Jamil, F., Al-Muhtaseb, A. H., Alhajeri, N. S., & Rooney, D. W. (2022) · Environmental Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1007/s10311-022-01458-1 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Gonzalez-Fernandez, C., Sialve, B., & Molinuevo-Salces, B.
- Affiliations
- Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
- IMDEA Energy Institute (ES)
- Venue
- Bioresource Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-12
- Volume
- 198
- Pages
- 896-906
- ISSN
- 0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1883394999
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 75
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Keywords
- anaerobic digestion, microalgae, microalgal biomass, anaerobic hydrolysis, biogas production, reactor design, microbial communities, biorefinery, carboxylate platform, biofuels, fertilizers
- MeSH terms
- Anaerobiosis, Hydrolysis, Biomass, Biofuels, Microalgae
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
