The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the fermentation quality and microbial community of the mixed silage of forage soybean with crop corn or sorghum
Abstract
The silage quality of forage soybean (FS) rich in protein with crop corn (CN) or sorghum (SG) rich in water soluble carbohydrate was investigated, and microbial community after ensiling was analyzed. Results showed that pH in mixed silages dropped to 3.5-3.8 lower than 100%FS silage (4.5). Microbial analysis indicated that mixed ensiling could influence the microbial community. Although Lactobacillus and Weissella were the dominant genera in all silage samples, Lactobacillus abundance in mixed silages (33-76%) was higher compared with 100%FS silage (27%). In conclusion, FS ensiled with CN or SG could be an alternative approach to improve FS silage quality.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) anaerobically convert water-soluble carbohydrates (WSCs) into organic acids, thereby lowering the pH and inhibiting the activity of harmful microorganisms, which can be used for large-scale mixed silage of high-moisture byproducts and dry byproduct feeds to preserve and enhance the nutritional value of feeds [8].”
Citations
Cites
Official Methods of Analysis of
Helrick, K. (1980) · Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ac50052a726 · Cited by 59,351
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78551-2 · Cited by 28,658
McDonald, P. (1981) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,473
Ni, K., Wang, F., Zhu, B., Yang, J., Zhou, G., Pan, Y., Tao, Y., & Zhong, J. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.055 · Cited by 435
Self-citationOliveira, A. S., Weinberg, Z. G., Ogunade, I. M., Cervantes, A. A. P., Arriola, K. G., Jiang, Y., Kim, D., Li, X., Gonçalves, M. C. M., Vyas, D., et al. (2017) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2016-11815 · Cited by 409
Ogunade, I. M., Jiang, Y., Pech Cervantes, A. A., Kim, D. H., Oliveira, A. S., Vyas, D., Weinberg, Z. G., Jeong, K. C., & Adesogan, A. T. (2018) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2017-12876 · Cited by 272
Wu, Q., Guo, W., Zheng, H., Luo, H., Feng, X., Yin, R., & Ren, N. (2016) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2016.06.006 · Cited by 207
Zhao, X., Liu, J., Liu, J., Yang, F., Zhu, W., Yuan, X., Hu, Y., Cui, Z., & Wang, X. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.183 · Cited by 171
Cao, Y., Cai, Y., Takahashi, T., Yoshida, N., Tohno, M., Uegaki, R., NONAKA, K., & Terada, F. (2011) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2010-3623 · Cited by 131
Co-ensiling of straw with sugar beet leaves increases the methane yield from straw
Larsen, S. U., Hjort-Gregersen, K., Vazifehkhoran, A. H., & Triolo, J. M. (2017) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.117 · Cited by 90
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yang, L., Yuan, X., Li, J., Dong, Z., & Shao, T. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.12.067 · Cited by 268
Liu, B., Huan, H., Gu, H., Xu, N., Shen, Q., & Ding, C. (2018) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.041 · Cited by 250
Bai, J., Ding, Z., Ke, W., Xu, D., Wang, M., Huang, W., Zhang, Y., Liu, F., & Guo, X. (2021) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/1751-7915.13785 · Cited by 190
Bai, J., Xu, D., Xie, D., Wang, M., Li, Z., & Guo, X. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123881 · Cited by 179
Wang, C., He, L., Xing, Y., Zhou, W. J., Yang, F., Chen, X., & Zhang, Q. (2019) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.129 · Cited by 143
Metadata
- Authors
- Ni, K., Zhao, J., Zhu, B., Su, R., Pan, Y., Ma, J., Zhou, G., Tao, Y., Liu, X., & Zhong, J.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhong, Jin
- Venue
- Bioresource Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 265
- Pages
- 563-567
- ISSN
- 0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2806020863
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 32.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Special Fund for Agro-scientific Research in the Public Interest (201503134)
- National Basic Research Program of China (2017YFD0101401)
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFJ-STS-ZDTP-004-2-2)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
- Keywords
- forage soybean, mixed silage, maize, sorghum, silage fermentation quality, microbial communities, Lactobacillus, Weissella, silage pH, silage fermentation, water-soluble carbohydrates, protein-rich forage
- MeSH terms
- Zea mays, Fermentation, Silage, Glycine max, Sorghum
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review