Cited by 16Algal biology and biofuel productionSeaweed-derived Bioactive CompoundsWastewater Treatment and Reuse

Embedding photosynthetic biorefineries with circular economies: Exploring the waste recycling potential of Arthrospira sp. to produce high quality by-products

Open access
Sachdeva, Neha, Mascolo, Cyril, Wattiez, Ruddy, Leroy, Baptiste·2018·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

This study was conducted with the aim of embedding circular economies (waste recycling) with photosynthetic biorefineries, for production of commercially viable by-products. Since nitrogen source constitute the major input costs for commercial Arthrospira sp. production, the use of nitrogen rich wastewater for Arthrospira sp. cultivation could significantly reduce their production costs. This study evaluated the effects of high concentrations (8.5-120 mM) of alternative nitrogen sources (urea, ammonium and nitrite) on the biochemical, pigment and proteomic profile of Arthrospira sp., under batch and continuous conditions. Arthrospira sp. cells fed with urea were quantified with modified biochemical and proteomic profile compared to the nitrate fed cells. No inhibitory effect of urea was observed on the biomass even at 120 mM. Nitrite fed cells exhibited comparable biochemical and proteomic profiles as nitrate fed cells. These results clearly indicated at the possibility of using urea rich wastewater streams for profitable cultivation of Arthrospira sp.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.101

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sachdeva, N., Mascolo, C., Wattiez, R., & Leroy, B.
Affiliations
University of Mons (BE)
Corresponding author
Leroy, Baptiste
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-11
Volume
268
Pages
237-246
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884171812
Cited by
16
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORBi UMONS (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Seaweed-derived Bioactive Compounds
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Wastewater Treatment and Reuse
Keywords
Arthrospira, Spirulina, circular economy, waste recycling, nitrogen-rich wastewater, urea, ammonium, nitrite, nitrogen source, biochemical profile, pigment composition, proteomic profile, continuous cropping, biomass production, by-products
MeSH terms
Nitrogen, Photosynthesis, Biomass, Proteomics, Spirulina, Recycling, Wastewater

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review