Cited by 4Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studiesUrinary Bladder and Prostate Research

Pelvic floor muscle training for urinary symptoms, vaginal prolapse, sexual function, pelvic floor muscle strength, and quality of life after hysterectomy: a systematic review with meta-analyses

Open access
de Oliveira, Néville Ferreira Fachini, Santuzzi, Cintia Helena, da Conceição, Thayara Viana, Freitas, Júlia Martins Vasconcellos, Liberato, Fernanda Mayrink Gonçalves, Nascimento, Lucas Rodrigues·2024·Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy

Abstract

Background After hysterectomy, women could experience pelvic floor dysfunction and negative impact on quality of life, which could be improved by pelvic floor muscle training.Objective To investigate effects of pelvic floor muscle training on urinary symptoms, vaginal prolapse, sexual function, pelvic floor muscle strength, and quality of life after hysterectomy.Methods Systematic review with meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. Trials with pelvic floor muscle training in women after hysterectomy were included. The outcomes measures were urinary symptoms, vaginal prolapse, sexual function, pelvic floor muscle strength, and quality of life. Quality of evidence was assessed by adopting the GRADE approach.Results Six trials, involving 776 participants, were included. The mean PEDro score of trials was 5.5. Moderate-quality evidence suggested that pelvic floor muscle training improves sexual function by 5 points (95% CI: 4, 6) on the Female Sexual Function Index, compared with no intervention. It might affect strength (SMD 0.5; 95% CI: -0.4, 1.3), quality of life (SMD 0.5 points out of 108, 95% CI: -0.1, 0.9), urinary symptoms (RD -0.02; 95% CI: -0.06, 0.1); however, the estimates were too imprecise. In addition, it produces no or negligible effects on vaginal prolapse (RD 0; 95% CI: -0.1, 0.1). Long-term effects remain uncertain.Conclusion This systematic review provides moderate-quality evidence that pelvic floor muscle training is effective for improving women's sexual function after hysterectomy, in comparison with no intervention. Benefits on urinary symptoms, pelvic floor muscle strength, quality of life, and vaginal prolapse remains unclear. Also, the effects beyond the intervention period remains uncertain.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101122

Cites

60 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pelvic surgery may temporarily impair the structural and functional integrity of the pelvic floor muscles and connective tissues that support the bladder and organs.

    “Pelvic surgery may temporarily impair the structural and functional integrity of the pelvic floor muscles and connective tissues that support the bladder and organs [48].”

    From Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Following Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Recommendation from Scientific Literature (2026) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Introduction says pelvic surgeries may damage or affect the function of pelvic floor muscles and connective tissue that support the bladder and reproductive organs. It does not say that this impairment is temporary; no page number is supplied for the passage. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Ostelo RWJG, Deyo RA, Stratford P, et al. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain. Spine. 2008;33(1):90À94. https://doi.org/10.1097/ brs.0b013e31815e3a1. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Oliveira, N. F. F., Santuzzi, C. H., da Conceição, T. V., Freitas, J. M. V., Liberato, F. M. G., & Nascimento, L. R.
Affiliations
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR)
Venue
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-09
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
101122
ISSN
1413-3555 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403310088
Cited by
3
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Federal University of Espirito Santo
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Keywords
pelvic floor muscle training, hysterectomy, urinary symptoms, vaginal prolapse, sexual function, female sexual function, pelvic floor muscle strength, quality of life
MeSH terms
Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Hysterectomy, Quality of Life, Uterine Prolapse, Pelvic Floor, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review