Cited by 15Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsSexual function and dysfunction studiesUterine Myomas and Treatments

Perioperative behavioral therapy and pelvic muscle strengthening do not enhance quality of life after pelvic surgery: Secondary report of a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Weidner, Alison C., Barber, Matthew D., Markland, Alayne, Rahn, David D., Hsu, Yvonne, Mueller, Elizabeth R., Jakus-Waldman, Sharon, Dyer, Keisha Y. +3 more·2017·Physical Therapy

Abstract

Background: There is significant need for trials evaluating the long-term effectiveness of a rigorous program of perioperative behavioral therapy with pelvic floor muscle training (BPMT) in women undergoing transvaginal reconstructive surgery for prolapse. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of perioperative BPMT on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and sexual function following vaginal surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Design: This study is a secondary report of a 2 × 2 factorial randomized controlled trial. Setting: This study was a multicenter trial. Participants: Participants were adult women with stage 2–4 POP and SUI. Intervention: Perioperative BPMT versus usual care and sacrospinous ligament fixation (SSLF) versus uterosacral ligament suspension (ULS) were provided. Measurements: Participants undergoing transvaginal surgery (SSLF or ULS for POP and a midurethral sling for SUI) received usual care or five perioperative BPMT visits. The primary outcome was change in body image and in Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ) short-form subscale, 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), Pelvic Organ Prolapse-Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire short form (PISQ-12), Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGII), and Brink scores. Results: The 374 participants were randomized to BPMT (n = 186) and usual care (n = 188). Outcomes were available for 137 (74%) of BPMT participants and 146 (78%) of the usual care participants at 24 months. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in PFIQ, SF-36, PGII, PISQ-12, or body image scale measures. Limitations: The clinicians providing BPMT had variable expertise. Findings might not apply to vaginal prolapse procedures without slings or abdominal apical prolapse procedures. Conclusions: Perioperative BPMT performed as an adjunct to vaginal surgery for POP and SUI provided no additional improvement in QOL or sexual function compared with usual care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ptj/pzx077

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weidner, A. C., Barber, M. D., Markland, A., Rahn, D. D., Hsu, Y., Mueller, E. R., Jakus-Waldman, S., Dyer, K. Y., Warren, L. K., Gantz, M. G., & Meikle, S.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Loyola University Medical Center (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente San Diego Medical Center (US)
  • RTI International (US)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (US)
Corresponding author
Weidner, Alison C.
Venue
Physical Therapy
Published
2017-07-29
Volume
97
Issue
11
Pages
1075-1083
ISSN
  • 0031-9023 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-6724
OpenAlex
W2782511226
Cited by
15
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physical Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • National Institutes of Health (U01 HD41249, U10 HD41250, U10 HD41261, U10 HD41267, U10 HD54136, U10 HD54214, U10 HD54215, U01 HD069031, U10 HD54241)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
pelvic floor muscle training, pelvic organ prolapse, stress urinary incontinence, sacrospinous ligament fixation, uterosacral ligament suspension, midurethral sling, health-related quality of life, sexual function, body image
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Body Image, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Treatment Outcome, Perioperative Care, Suburethral Slings, Resistance Training, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review