Cited by 25Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and Dynamicsvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Challenges of docking in large, flexible and promiscuous binding sites

Open access
Kotev, Martin, Soliva, Robert, Orozco, Modesto·2016·Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry

Abstract

After decades of work, the correct determination of the binding mode of a small molecule into a target protein is still a challenging problem, whose difficulty depends on: (i) the sizes of the binding site and the ligand; (ii) the flexibility of both interacting partners, and (iii) the differential solvation of bound and unbound partners. We have evaluated the performance of standard rigid(receptor)/flexible(ligand) docking approaches with respect to last-generation fully flexible docking methods to obtain reasonable poses in a very challenging case: soluble Epoxide Hydrolase (sEH), a flexible protein showing different binding sites. We found that full description of the flexibility of both protein and ligand and accurate description of solvation leads to significant improvement in the ability of docking to reproduce well known binding modes, and at the same time capture the intrinsic binding promiscuity of the protein.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bmc.2016.08.010

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kotev, M., Soliva, R., & Orozco, M.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Research in Biomedicine (ES)
  • Barcelona Supercomputing Center (ES)
Corresponding author
Orozco, Modesto
Venue
Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
24
Issue
20
Pages
4961-4969
ISSN
0968-0896 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2508448504
Cited by
25
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Funders
  • Fundació Marató TV3
  • H2020
  • MINECO (BIO2015/64802-R)
  • ICREA
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
molecular docking, binding site flexibility, binding promiscuity, solvation effects, soluble epoxide hydrolase, protein-ligand binding mode, ligand flexibility
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Epoxide Hydrolases, Humans, Ligands, Molecular Structure, Small Molecule Libraries, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review