Cited by 3Circadian rhythm and melatoninProtein Structure and DynamicsProtein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling

Markovian state models uncover casein kinase 1 dynamics that govern circadian period

Open access
Ricci, Clarisse Gravina, Philpott, Jonathan M., Torgrimson, Megan R., Freeberg, Alfred M., Narasimamurthy, Rajesh, Pécora de Barros, Emilia, Amaro, Rommie, Virshup, David M. +2 more·2025·Biophysical Journal

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Circadian rhythms in mammals are tightly regulated through phosphorylation of Period (PER) proteins by Casein Kinase 1 (CK1, subtypes δ and ε). CK1 acts on at least two different regions of PER with opposing effects: phosphorylation of phosphodegron (pD) regions leads to PER degradation, while phosphorylation of the Familial Advanced Sleep Phase (FASP) region leads to PER stabilization. To investigate how substrate selectivity is encoded by the conformational dynamics of CK1, we performed a large set of independent molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of wildtype CK1 and the tau mutant (R178C) that biases kinase activity toward a pD. We used Markovian State Models (MSMs) to integrate the simulations into a single model of the conformational landscape of CK1 and used Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (GaMD) to build the first molecular model of CK1 and the unphosphorylated FASP motif. Together, these findings provide a mechanistic view of CK1, establishing how the activation loop acts as a key molecular switch to control substrate selectivity. We show that the tau mutant favors an alternative conformation of the activation loop and significantly accelerates the dynamics of CK1. This reshapes the binding cleft in a way that impairs FASP binding and would ultimately lead to PER destabilization and shorter circadian periods. Finally, we identified an allosteric pocket that could be targeted to bias this molecular switch. Our integrated approach offers a detailed model of CK1’s conformational landscape and its relevance to normal, mutant, and druggable circadian timekeeping. Statement of Significance Disruption of circadian rhythms alters the temporal orchestration of vital cellular processes and increases the propensity for sleep disorders, metabolic disease, and cancer. Circadian rhythms are generated by a vast gene expression program controlled at the cellular level by a molecular clock comprised of dedicated clock proteins. Amongst the essential protein characters is Casein kinase 1 (CK1), which acts on multiple clock protein substrates. A delicate balance of CK1 activity on these substrates is crucial for proper circadian timekeeping, highlighting CK1 as a promising drug target to tune clock timing. This work aims to identify the conformational landscape of CK1 that underlies its substrate specificity and provide molecular insight for pharmacologic development that could modulate CK1 function for those suffering from clock-related syndromes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bpj.2025.09.022

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Ricci, C. G., Philpott, J. M., Torgrimson, M. R., Freeberg, A. M., Narasimamurthy, R., Pécora de Barros, E., Amaro, R., Virshup, D. M., McCammon, J. A., & Partch, C. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
  • Duke-NUS Medical School (SG)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Ricci, Clarisse Gravina
  • Partch, Carrie L.
Venue
Biophysical Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-11
Volume
124
Issue
22
Pages
4034-4048
ISSN
0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414306832
Cited by
3
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35 GM141849)
  • Ministry of Health -Singapore (MOH-000600)
  • University of California, San Diego
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling
Keywords
casein kinase 1, circadian period, phosphodegron, substrate specificity, conformational landscape, Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics, circadian clock

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review