Cited by 27Estrogen and related hormone effectsStress Responses and CortisolNuclear Receptors and Signaling

Neuroanatomical distribution and colocalisation of nuclear receptor corepressor (N-CoR) and silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid receptors (SMRT) in rat brain.

van der Laan, S., Lachize, S.B., Schouten, T.G., Vreugdenhil, E., de Kloet, E.R., Meijer, O.C.·2005·Brain Research

Abstract

The two structurally related nuclear receptor corepressor (N-CoR) and silencing mediator of retinoid and thyroid receptors (SMRT) proteins have been found to differentially affect the transcriptional activity of numerous nuclear receptors, such as thyroid hormone, retinoic acid and steroid receptors. Because of the numerous effects mediated by nuclear receptors in brain, it is of interest to extend these in vitro data and to explore the cellular distribution of both corepressors in brain tissue. We therefore examined, using in situ hybridisation, whether the relative abundance of these two functionally distinct corepressors differed in rat brain and pituitary. We find that although both N-CoR and SMRT transcripts are ubiquitously expressed in brain, striking differences in their respective levels of expression could be observed in discrete areas of brain stem, thalamus, hypothalamus and hippocampus. Using dual-label immunofluorescence, we examined in selected glucocorticoid sensitive areas involved in the regulation of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis activity, the respective protein abundance of N-CoR and SMRT. Protein abundance was largely concurrent with the mRNA expression levels, with SMRT relatively more abundant in hypothalamus and brain stem areas. Colocalisation of N-CoR and SMRT was demonstrated by confocal microscopy in most areas studied. Taken together, these findings are consistent with the idea that the uneven neuroanatomical distribution of N-CoR and SM…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.08.011

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Laan, S., Lachize, S. B., Schouten, T. G., Vreugdenhil, E., de Kloet, E. R., & Meijer, O. C.
Affiliations
Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
Venue
Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-10
Volume
1059
Issue
2
Pages
113-121
ISSN
0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994398354
Cited by
27
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
Keywords
nuclear receptor corepressor, SMRT, neuroanatomical distribution, colocalization, hypothalamus, brainstem, hippocampus, thalamus, pituitary gland, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, glucocorticoids, gene expression, rat brain
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, DNA-Binding Proteins, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Male, Nuclear Proteins, Pituitary Gland, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Repressor Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Tissue Distribution, Transcription, Genetic, Signal Transduction, Rats, Wistar, In Situ Hybridization, Rats, Nuclear Receptor Co-Repressor 1, Nuclear Receptor Co-Repressor 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review