Cited by 308Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchNeuroscience of respiration and sleep

The yin and yang of cardiac autonomic control: Vago-sympathetic interactions revisited

Paton, J.F.R., Boscan, P., Pickering, A.E., Nalivaiko, E.·2005·Brain Research Reviews

Abstract

We review the pattern of activity in the parasympathetic and sympathetic nerves innervating the heart. Unlike the conventional textbook picture of reciprocal control of cardiac vagal and sympathetic nervous activity, as seen during a baroreceptor reflex, many other reflexes involve simultaneous co-activation of both autonomic limbs. Indeed, even at 'rest', the heart receives tonic drives from both sympathetic and parasympathetic cardiac nerves. Autonomic co-activation occurs during peripheral chemoreceptor, diving, oculocardiac, somatic nociceptor reflex responses as well as being evoked from structures within the brain. It is suggested that simultaneous co-activation may lead to a more efficient cardiac function giving greater cardiac output than activation of the sympathetic limb alone; this permits both a longer time for ventricular filling and a stronger contraction of the myocardium. This may be important when pumping blood into a constricted vascular tree such as is the case during the diving response. We discuss that in some instances, high drive to the heart from both autonomic limbs may also be arrhythmogenic.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2005.02.005

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sympathetic and vagal systems can act independently.

    “The combination of sympathetic and vagal influence reflects the fact that these systems can act independently (Paton et al., 2005).”

    From Music structure determines heart rate variability of singers (2013) · cites this paper as Paton et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paton, J. F. R., Boscan, P., Pickering, A. E., & Nalivaiko, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital (US)
  • Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Nalivaiko, E.
Venue
Brain Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
555-565
ISSN
0165-0173 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977962340
Cited by
308
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 23
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • British Heart Foundation
  • University of Bristol
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
Keywords
cardiac autonomic control, baroreflex, chemoreceptor reflex, diving reflex, oculocardiac reflex, nociceptive reflex, cardiac output, ventricular filling, cardiac contraction, arrhythmogenesis, autonomic reflexes
MeSH terms
Animals, Autonomic Nervous System, Heart, Humans, Parasympathetic Nervous System, Sympathetic Nervous System, Tachycardia, Vagus Nerve, Yin-Yang

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review