The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The efficacy of cognitive-behavioral interventions for reducing anxiety sensitivity: A meta-analytic review
Abstract
The present study meta-analytically reviewed the efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) vs. control conditions in the reduction of anxiety sensitivity. A computerized search was conducted to identify CBT outcome studies that included the Anxiety Sensitivity Index as a dependent variable. Of the 989 studies that were identified, 24 randomized-controlled trials with a total of 1851 participants met inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Data were extracted separately for treatment-seeking (16 studies) and at-risk (eight studies) samples. Results indicated large effect sizes for treatment-seeking samples, Hedges' g=1.40, SE=0.21, 95% CI: 1.00-1.81, p<0.001, and moderate to large effect sizes for at risk samples Hedges' g=0.74, SE=0.18, 95% CI: 0.39-1.08, p<0.001. Additionally, both the amount of therapist contact and control modality (waitlist vs. psychological control) moderated the effect sizes for treatment-seeking samples. Our review indicates that CBT is efficacious in reducing anxiety sensitivity. However, more research is needed to determine the mechanisms by which CBT exert its effects on anxiety sensitivity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, CBT has been shown to successfully reduce AS across a range of mood and anxiety disorders, with large effect sizes (Smits et al., 2008).”
From Early reduction in anxiety sensitivity predicts greater reduction in disordered eating and trait anxiety during treatment for bulimia nervosa. (2024) · cites this paper as Smits et al., 2008
In the citing paper
“AS is effectively reduced during CBT for anxiety (Smits et al., 2008) and brief interventions targeting AS (Fitzgerald et al., 2021).”
From Early reduction in anxiety sensitivity predicts greater reduction in disordered eating and trait anxiety during treatment for bulimia nervosa. (2024) · cites this paper as Smits et al., 2008
In the citing paper
“There is evidence that treatments specifically targeting DT can help “pre-train” individuals for coping with high stress and withdrawal sensations.”
From A randomized controlled trial protocol for engaging distress tolerance and working memory to aid smoking cessation in low socioeconomic status (SES) adults (2020) · cites this paper as Smits, Berry, Tart, & Powers, 2008
In the citing paper
“For example, M. W. Otto and associates have repeatedly documented the value of interoceptive exposure (IE) interventions targeting anxiety sensitivity for helping prepare patients to persist through the stress, negative affect, and somatic symptoms inherent to benzodiazepine withdrawal, with intervention effects reflecting large effect sizes (M. W. Otto et al., 1993; M. W. Otto et al., 2010; for”
From A randomized controlled trial protocol for engaging distress tolerance and working memory to aid smoking cessation in low socioeconomic status (SES) adults (2020) · cites this paper as Smits, Berry, Tart, & Powers, 2008
Citations
Cites
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.
Freeman, P. R., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1986) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531069 · Cited by 4,840
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635
Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index?
Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Botella, J. (2006) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.11.2.193 · Cited by 4,256
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series D (The Statistician) · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: a meta-analytic review
Martin, D. J., Garske, J. P., & Davis, M. K. (2000) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.68.3.438 · Cited by 3,355
Anxiety, sensitivity, anxiety frequency, and the prediction of fearfulness
Reiss, S., Peterson, R. A., Gursky, D. M., & McNally, R. J. (1986) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/0005-7967(86)90143-9 · Cited by 3,169
Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis.
Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.486 · Cited by 2,977
Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis
Horvath, A. O., & Symonds, B. D. (1991) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.2.139 · Cited by 2,673
Set correlation and contingency tables
Cohen, J. (1988) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662168801200410 · Cited by 1,825
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Plotkin, D. (2001). The effects of interoceptive exposure on fear reduction and return of fear in individuals with public speaking anxiety. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Los Angeles: University of California.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fear of the unknown: One fear to rule them all?
Carleton, R. N. (2016) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2016.03.011 · Cited by 647
Anxiety sensitivity and the anxiety disorders: A meta-analytic review and synthesis.
Olatunji, B. O., & Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0017428 · Cited by 609
Meta-analysis of the relations of anxiety sensitivity to the depressive and anxiety disorders.
Naragon-Gainey, K. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018055 · Cited by 555
Leventhal, A. M., & Zvolensky, M. J. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000003 · Cited by 524
A systematic review of sleep disturbance in anxiety and related disorders
Cox, R. C., & Olatunji, B. O. (2016) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.12.001 · Cited by 395
Metadata
- Authors
- Smits, J. A. J., Berry, A. C., Tart, C. D., & Powers, M. B.
- Affiliations
- Southern Methodist University (US)
- University of Amsterdam (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Smits, Jasper A.J.
- Venue
- Behaviour Research and Therapy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1047-1054
- ISSN
- 0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116897798
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 7.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- cognitive behavioral therapy, anxiety sensitivity, Anxiety Sensitivity Index, treatment efficacy, therapist contact, waitlist control, psychological control, mechanisms of change
- MeSH terms
- Anxiety Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review