Cited by 45Mental Health via WritingPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Word use of outpatients with a personality disorder and concurrent or previous major depressive disorder

Molendijk, Marc L., Bamelis, Lotte, van Emmerik, Arnold A.P., Arntz, Arnoud, Haringsma, Rimke, Spinhoven, Philip·2010·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

In a recent study, Rude, Gortner, and Pennebaker (2004) found word use to be related to depression and vulnerability to depression in the essays of college students. We sought to replicate and extend these findings in a clinical sample. Written essays of 304 psychiatric outpatients with a personality disorder and a mixed psychiatric profile on DSM-IV axis-I and 108 healthy controls were examined with word count software. Data on the tendency to be discrepant about the current self compared to a more ideal self were also gathered. We found that psychiatric outpatients in general used more words referring to the self and negative emotion words and fewer positive emotion words, compared to healthy controls. However, word-use proved unrelated to depression specifically. Actual-ideal self discrepancies were related to patient status and to current depression. Contrary to our hypothesis, these discrepancies did not correlate with the use of words referring to the self. We conclude that the negative content and self-focus of written essays and high levels of discrepancy reflect a negative thinking style that is common to a range of psychiatric disorders rather than being specific to depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2009.09.007

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Molendijk, M. L., Bamelis, L., van Emmerik, A. A. P., Arntz, A., Haringsma, R., & Spinhoven, P.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Maastricht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Molendijk, Marc L.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
44-51
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159923678
Cited by
45
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
personality disorders, major depressive disorder, word usage, written essays, self-referential language, negative emotion words, positive emotion words, psychiatric outpatients
MeSH terms
Adult, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Models, Psychological, Personality Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psycholinguistics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Concept, Software, Time Factors, Vocabulary, Writing, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review