Cited by 481Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Emotional processing, three modes of mind and the prevention of relapse in depression

Teasdale, John D.·1999·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Rachman's (1980) analysis [Rachman, S. (1980). Emotional processing. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 18, 51-60] of emotional processing is extended and applied to the prevention of relapse and recurrence in depression. It is proposed that effective emotional processing leads to changes in the ability of triggering cues to reactivate depressogenic processing cycles at times of potential relapse. Available evidence supports the usefulness of the probe methodology of the emotional processing framework as a way to investigate processes mediating relapse prevention by cognitive therapy. It is proposed that effective emotional processing involves creation of modified affect-related schematic mental models and that this occurs most effectively only within certain processing configurations or modes of mind. Within the Interacting Cognitive Subsystems (ICS) framework, three modes of processing emotional material can be distinguished: 'mindless emoting'; 'conceptualising/doing' and 'mindful experiencing/being'. Only the last of these facilitates emotional processing; the second may prevent effective emotional processing and perpetuate depression by ruminative, conceptually dominated processing. This analysis suggests a further strategy to prevent relapse, in addition to modifying depressogenic schematic models, by teaching recovered depressed patients skills to switch processing modes by intentional redeployment of attention. Results of a recent trial of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy support the effectiveness of this novel alternative strategy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0005-7967(99)00050-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This is consistent with suggestions that there may be more than one mode of self-focus, in that participants in the current study seemed able to use MBCT techniques and focus on bodily sensations without being drawn into a ruminative spiral.

    “This is consistent with suggestions that there may be more than one mode of self-focus (Teasdale, 1999), in that participants in the current study seemed to be able to use MBCT techniques and focus on bodily sensations without being drawn into a ruminative spiral.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Teasdale, J. D.
Affiliations
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
Teasdale, John D.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-07
Volume
37
Pages
S53-S77
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076940846
Cited by
481
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 39
FWCI
10.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
emotional processing, depression relapse prevention, depression recurrence, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy
MeSH terms
Affect, Attention, Defense Mechanisms, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Models, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Self Efficacy, Secondary Prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review