CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 129Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Objective and subjective bulimic episodes in the classification of bulimic-type eating disorders: Another nail in the coffin of a problematic distinction

Open access
Mond, J.M., Latner, J.D., Hay, P.H., Owen, C., Rodgers, B.·2010·Behaviour Research and Therapy
DOI 10.1016/j.brat.2010.03.020
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We sought to further explore the validity of the distinction between objective bulimic episodes (OBEs) and subjective bulimic episodes (SBEs) in the study of bulimic-type eating disorders. Drawing on data obtained at the second, interview phase of a large-scale epidemiological study, we identified mutually exclusive subgroups of women with bulimic-type eating disorders who engaged in regular OBEs but not SBEs (n = 37) or regular SBEs but not OBEs (n = 52). These subgroups were compared on a wide range of outcomes, including socio-demographic characteristics, current levels of eating disorder psychopathology, general psychological distress and impairment in role functioning, current and lifetime impairment in quality of life specifically associated with an eating problem, (self)-recognition of an eating problem, health service utilization and use of psychotropic medication. The only difference between groups was that participants who reported regular OBEs were heavier than those who reported regular SBEs. The findings converge with those of previous research in suggesting that bulimic-type eating disorders characterized by regular SBEs, but not OBEs, do not differ in any clinically meaningful way from those characterized by regular OBEs, but not SBEs. Inclusion of bulimic-type eating disorders characterized by regular SBEs as a provisional category requiring further research in DSM-V appears warranted.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2010.03.020

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Fairburn, C. G, & Cooper, Z. (2000). The eating disorders Examination (14th ed.). Unpublished interview schedule.
  2. Mond, J. M., Peterson, C. B., & Hay, P. J. Prior use of extreme weight control behaviors in a community sample of women with binge eating disorder. International Journal of Eating Disorders, in press, doi:10.1002/eat.20707. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mond, J. M., Latner, J. D., Hay, P. H., Owen, C., & Rodgers, B.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
  • Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Mond, J.M.
ORCID
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-07
Volume
48
Issue
7
Pages
661-669
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.brat.2010.03.020
OpenAlex
W2050361075
Cited by
129
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
DSM-5 classification, binge eating, psychological distress, quality of life, health care utilization, psychotropic drug use, women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Weight, Bulimia, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Surveys and Questionnaires, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review