Cited by 45Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

A controlled evaluation of the distress criterion for binge eating disorder.

Open access
Grilo, Carlos M., White, Marney A.·2011·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Research has examined various aspects of the validity of the research criteria for binge eating disorder (BED) but has yet to evaluate the utility of Criterion C, "marked distress about binge eating." This study examined the significance of the marked distress criterion for BED using 2 complementary comparison groups. METHOD: A total of 1,075 community volunteers completed a battery of self-report instruments as part of an Internet study. Analyses compared body mass index (BMI), eating-disorder psychopathology, and depressive levels in 4 groups: 97 participants with BED except for the distress criterion (BED-ND), 221 participants with BED including the distress criterion (BED), 79 participants with bulimia nervosa (BN), and 489 obese participants without binge eating or purging (NBPO). Parallel analyses compared these study groups using the broadened frequency criterion (i.e., once weekly for binge/purge behaviors) proposed for the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) and the 4th edition (DSM-IV) twice-weekly frequency criterion. RESULTS: The BED group had significantly greater eating-disorder psychopathology and depressive levels than the BED-ND group. The BED group, but not the BED-ND group, had significantly greater eating-disorder psychopathology than the NBPO comparison group. The BN group had significantly greater eating-disorder psychopathology and depressive levels than all 3 other groups. The group differences in eating-disorder psychopathology existed even after controlling for depression levels, BMI, and demographic variables, although some differences between the BN and BED groups were attenuated when controlling for depression levels. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide support for the validity of the "marked distress" criterion for the diagnosis of BED.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0024259

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Rice RE Influences, usage, and outcomes of internet health information searching International Journal of Medical Informatics 2006 75 8 28 16125453

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grilo, C. M., & White, M. A.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
Published
2011
Volume
79
Issue
4
Pages
509-514
ISSN
  • 0022-006X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2117
OpenAlex
W2034252974
Cited by
45
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (K24 DK070052)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
binge eating disorder, diagnostic criteria validity, bulimia nervosa, obesity, eating disorder psychopathology, depression, body mass index
MeSH terms
Bulimia, Female, Humans, Male, Stress, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results, Body Mass Index, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Binge-Eating Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review