Cited by 36Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and Influences

Induction of conditioned avoidance via mental imagery

Open access
Krypotos, Angelos-Militaris, Mertens, Gaëtan, Leer, Arne, Engelhard, Iris M.·2020·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

There is a growing interest on how mental imagery may be involved in the onset and maintenance of anxiety-related disorders. Here, we used an experimental design to investigate whether a key symptom across anxiety-related disorders, namely avoidance, can be induced via mental imagery. Healthy participants first learned that one neutral stimulus (A) was associated with a mild electric shock and two other neutral stimuli (B and C) were not. They then learned to cancel the shock when A was presented, by pressing a button on a keyboard ('behavioral avoidance'). Next, they were asked to imagine that stimulus B was followed by the shock (i.e., without actual B or shock presentations; Experiment 1; N = 66) or they were shown B and asked to imagine the shock (i.e., without actual shock presentations; Experiment 2; N = 60). Finally, in the test phase, they were shown each of the three stimuli (without the shock) and given the opportunity to make the avoidance response. Results showed that participants tended to avoid B in the test phase in Experiment 1, even though it had never been presented with the shock but not in Experiment 2. We discuss how the findings may explain the acquisition of avoidance in the presentation of innocuousstimuli across anxiety-related disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103652

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If patients with anxiety disorders experience intense threat imagery, they might be too anxious or unwilling to confront feared stimuli, which could explain the low attrition rates in exposure therapy.

    “If patients with anxiety disorders experience intense threat imagery, they might be too anxious [27, 28] or unwilling to confront feared stimuli [28–30], which could explain the low attrition rates in exposure therapy.”

    From Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy or supportive counseling prior to exposure therapy in patients with panic disorder: study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled trial (IMPROVE) (2023) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Introduction (p. 4) proposes that mental imagery may lead to behavioral avoidance, including avoidance of innocuous stimuli by people with anxiety symptoms. The experiment described in the Abstract (p. 2) found imagery-induced avoidance in healthy participants. It does not establish that patients experiencing intense threat imagery become too anxious or unwilling to confront feared stimuli; the exposure-therapy explanation is the citing authors’ inference, not a finding of this study. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mental imagery of potential threats can result in fear and avoidance learning.

    “It has been emphasized in fear conditioning research that mental imagery of potential threats can result in fear and avoidance learning (e.g., Krypotos et al. 2020;Mertens, Krypotos, and Engelhard 2020;Mueller, Sperl, and Panitz 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Baddeley, A. D., & Andrade, J. (2000). Working memory and the vividness of imagery. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General , 129 , 126. DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.129.1.126 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Effting, M., & Kindt, M. (2007). Contextual control of human fear associations in a renewal paradigm. Behaviour Research and Therapy , 45 , 2002-2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.02.011 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Krypotos, A.-M., Mertens, G., Leer, A., & Engelhard, I. M.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
132
Pages
103652
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3033848123
Cited by
36
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research portal (Tilburg University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
mental imagery, avoidance conditioning, anxiety disorders, avoidance learning, fear conditioning, electric shock, behavioral avoidance, stimulus generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review