Cited by 41Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifePsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsDigital Mental Health Interventions

Cost-effectiveness of feedback-informed psychological treatment: Evidence from the IAPT-FIT trial

Open access
Delgadillo, Jaime, McMillan, Dean, Gilbody, Simon, de Jong, Kim, Lucock, Mike, Lutz, Wolfgang, Rubel, Julian, Aguirre, Elisa +1 more·2021·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Background Feedback-informed treatment (FIT) involves using computerized routine outcome monitoring technology to alert therapists to cases that are not responding well to psychotherapy, prompting them to identify and resolve obstacles to improvement. In this study, we present the first health economic evaluation of FIT, compared to usual care, to enable decision makers to judge whether this approach represents a good investment for health systems. Methods This randomised controlled trial included 2233 patients clustered within 77 therapists who were randomly assigned to a FIT group (n = 1176) or a usual care control group (n = 1057). Treatment response was monitored using patient-reported depression (PHQ-9) and anxiety (GAD-7) measures. Therapists in the FIT group had access to a computerized algorithm that alerted them to cases that were "not on track", compared to normative clinical data. Health service costs included the cost of training therapists to use FIT and the cost of therapy sessions in each arm. The incremental cost-effectiveness of FIT was assessed relative to usual care, using multilevel modelling. Results FIT was associated with an increased probability of reliable symptomatic improvement by 8.09 percentage points (95% CI: 4.16%-12.03%) which was statistically significant. The incremental cost of FIT was £15.17 (95% CI: £6.95 to £37.29) per patient and was not statistically significant. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per additional case of reliable improvement was £187.4 (95% CI: £126.7 to £501.5); this confidence interval shows that the relative cost-effectiveness is between FIT being a dominant strategy (i.e. more effective and also cost-saving) to FIT being more effective at a modest incremental cost to the health system. Conclusions The FIT strategy increases the probability of reliable improvement in routine clinical practice and may be associated with a small (but uncertain) incremental cost. FIT is likely to be a cost-effective strategy for mental health services.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2021.103873

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. National IAPT Team. (2015). National curriculum for the education of Psychological Wellbeing Practitioners, Third edition . London: NHS England/Department of Health.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Delgadillo, J., McMillan, D., Gilbody, S., de Jong, K., Lucock, M., Lutz, W., Rubel, J., Aguirre, E., & Ali, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
  • University of Huddersfield (GB)
  • Universität Trier (DE)
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Delgadillo, Jaime
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-07
Volume
142
Pages
103873
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3158218208
Cited by
41
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
  • Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
UKRI
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
feedback-informed treatment, routine outcome monitoring, cost-effectiveness, depression, anxiety, psychotherapy, mental health services, usual care, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Feedback, Humans, Psychotherapy, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review