The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CNS BOLD fMRI Effects of Sham-Controlled Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in the Left Outer Auditory Canal – A Pilot Study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND It has recently been shown that electrical stimulation of sensory afferents within the outer auditory canal may facilitate a transcutaneous form of central nervous system stimulation. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) effects in limbic and temporal structures have been detected in two independent studies. In the present study, we investigated BOLD fMRI effects in response to transcutaneous electrical stimulation of two different zones in the left outer auditory canal. It is hypothesized that different central nervous system (CNS) activation patterns might help to localize and specifically stimulate auricular cutaneous vagal afferents. METHODOLOGY 16 healthy subjects aged between 20 and 37 years were divided into two groups. 8 subjects were stimulated in the anterior wall, the other 8 persons received transcutaneous vagus nervous stimulation (tVNS) at the posterior side of their left outer auditory canal. For sham control, both groups were also stimulated in an alternating manner on their corresponding ear lobe, which is generally known to be free of cutaneous vagal innervation. Functional MR data from the cortex and brain stem level were collected and a group analysis was performed. RESULTS In most cortical areas, BOLD changes were in the opposite direction when comparing anterior vs. posterior stimulation of the left auditory canal. The only exception was in the insular cortex, where both stimulation types evoked positive BOLD changes. Prominent decreases of the BOLD signals were detected in the parahippocampal gyrus, posterior cingulate cortex and right thalamus (pulvinar) following anterior stimulation. In subcortical areas at brain stem level, a stronger BOLD decrease as compared with sham stimulation was found in the locus coeruleus and the solitary tract only during stimulation of the anterior part of the auditory canal. CONCLUSIONS The results of the study are in line with previous fMRI studies showing robust BOLD signal decreases in limbic structures and the brain stem during electrical stimulation of the left anterior auditory canal. BOLD signal decreases in the area of the nuclei of the vagus nerve may indicate an effective stimulation of vagal afferences. In contrast, stimulation at the posterior wall seems to lead to unspecific changes of the BOLD signal within the solitary tract, which is a key relay station of vagal neurotransmission. The results of the study show promise for a specific novel method of cranial nerve stimulation and provide a basis for further developments and applications of non-invasive transcutaneous vagus stimulation in psychiatric patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Drevets, W. C., Price, J. L., & Furey, M. L. (2008) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-008-0189-x · Cited by 2,241 · cited 1×
“These regions are known to be of importance in the pathophysiology of depressive states [44] where limbic hyperactivity might underlie abnormal emotional processing [45] and has been reported in the medial and inferior frontal cortex and basal ganglia, namely the caudate nucleus and the putamen, during induction of ne…”
A meta‐analytic study of changes in brain activation in depression
Fitzgerald, P. B., Laird, A. R., Maller, J., & Daskalakis, Z. J. (2008) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20426 · Cited by 903
Nemeroff, C. B., Mayberg, H. S., Krahl, S. E., McNamara, J., Frazer, A., Henry, T. R., George, M. S., Charney, D. S., & Brannan, S. K. (2006) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301082 · Cited by 496
Vagus nerve stimulation: a new tool for brain research and therapy
George, M. S., Sackeim, H. A., Rush, A. J., Marangell, L. B., Nahas, Z., Husain, M. M., Lisanby, S., Burt, T., Goldman, J., & Ballenger, J. C. (2000) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(99)00308-x · Cited by 461
Cole, J., Costafreda, S. G., McGuffin, P., & Fu, C. H. Y. (2011) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2011.05.057 · Cited by 319
A review of functional neuroimaging studies of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS)
Chae, J.-H., Nahas, Z., Lomarev, M., Denslow, S., Lorberbaum, J. P., Bohning, D. E., & George, M. S. (2003) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/s0022-3956(03)00074-8 · Cited by 255
Ventral medial prefrontal cortex and cardiovagal control in conscious humans
Wong, S. W., Massé, N., Kimmerly, D. S., Menon, R. S., & Shoemaker, J. K. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.027 · Cited by 233
The functional neuroanatomy of bipolar disorder
Cerullo, M. A., Adler, C. M., Delbello, M. P., & Strakowski, S. M. (2009) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/09540260902962107 · Cited by 113
Cited by
Optimization of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Using Functional MRI
Yakunina, N., Kim, S. S., & Nam, E.-C. (2017) · Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface · doi:10.1111/ner.12541 · Cited by 494
Yap, J. Y. Y., Keatch, C., Lambert, E., Woods, W., Stoddart, P. R., & Kameneva, T. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00284 · Cited by 432
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Modulates Default Mode Network in Major Depressive Disorder
Fang, J., Rong, P., Hong, Y., Fan, Y., Liu, J., Wang, H., Zhang, G., Chen, X., Shi, S., Wang, L., et al. (2016) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.03.025 · Cited by 408
Howland, R. H. (2014) · Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports · doi:10.1007/s40473-014-0010-5 · Cited by 405
Badran, B. W., Dowdle, L. T., Mithoefer, O. J., LaBate, N. T., Coatsworth, J., Brown, J. C., DeVries, W. H., Austelle, C. W., McTeague, L. M., & George, M. S. (2018) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.009 · Cited by 396
Metadata
- Authors
- Kraus, T., Kiess, O., Hösl, K., Terekhin, P., Kornhuber, J., & Forster, C.
- Venue
- Brain Stimulation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 798-804
- ISSN
- 1876-4754 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-861X
- OpenAlex
- W2121478186
- Cited by
- 301
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: CNS BOLD fMRI Effects of Sham-Controlled Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in the Left Outer Auditory Canal – A Pilot Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.brs.2013.01.011
- The paper
- Kraus, T., Kiess, O., Hösl, K., Terekhin, P., Kornhuber, J., & Forster, C. (2013). CNS BOLD fMRI Effects of Sham-Controlled Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in the Left Outer Auditory Canal – A Pilot Study. Brain Stimulation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2013.01.011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.