Left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex rTMS in alleviating MTBI related headaches and depressive symptoms
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
TMS has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of PTSD, chronic pain, cognitive deficits, and headaches in individuals with mTBI.
“TMS also has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), chronic pain, cognitive deficits, and headaches in individuals with mTBI [23-27].”
There is accumulating evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of TMS for sequelae of mTBI and related neuropsychiatric conditions, including depression, cognitive deficits, and chronic pain or headaches.
“There is accumulating evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of TMS for sequelae of mTBI and related neuropsychiatric conditions, including depression, cognitive deficits, and chronic pain or headaches [23-26].”
Multiple studies and meta-analyses demonstrate that TMS, administered to a variety of brain locations including the DLPFC, does not induce more significant numbers of adverse events among individuals with mTBI than among individuals without mTBI.
“Further, multiple studies and meta-analyses demonstrate that TMS, administered to a variety of brain locations, including the DLPFC, does not induce more significant numbers of AEs among individuals with mTBI than among individuals without mTBI [23,25,62,63].”
Studies show that both TMS and iTBS appear safe and effective when administered to other anatomical sites in individuals with mTBI.
“as studies show that both TMS and iTBS appear safe and effective when administered to other anatomical sites in individuals with mTBI [23-26].”
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stilling, J., Monchi, O., Amoozegar, F., & Debert, C. (2019) · Headache · doi:10.1111/head.13479 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in trauma-related conditions
Namgung, E., Kim, M., & Yoon, S. J. (2019) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s189498 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Neuropsychiatry
Rabins, P. V. (2001) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.10.1753-a · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Bernanke, A., Hasley, R., Sabetfakhri, N., de Wit, H., Smith, B. M., Wang, L., Brenner, L. A., Hanlon, C., Philip, N. S., Ajilore, O., et al. (2024) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/58206 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leung, A., Metzger-Smith, V., He, Y., Cordero, J., Ehlert, B., Song, D., Golshan, S., Tsai, A., Vaninetti, M., Rutledge, T., Polston, G., Sheu, R., & Lee, R.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- VA San Diego Healthcare System (US)
- Naval Medical Center San Diego (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Brain Stimulation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- e1
- ISSN
- 1876-4754 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-861X
- OpenAlex
- W2801777578
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2019: 2
- FWCI
- 0.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doaj.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Brain stimulation (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
- Keywords
- repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, mild traumatic brain injury, neuropathic pain, depressive symptoms, neuropsychological dysfunction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
