Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on cognitive reappraisal: An unexpected result?
Open accessAbstract
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to modulate crucial areas involved in emotion regulation processing. Cognitive reappraisal (CR), the most studied emotion regulation strategy, consists in manipulating the meaning of a stimulus in order to alter its emotional impact. It can be implemented by two basic tactics: detachment, when adopting a detached perspective about a situation, or reinterpretation, when directly changing the meaning of a situation [1].
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Results of brain stimulation studies on the PFC and emotion regulation are inconsistent.
“However, results of these studies have been inconsistent. While some studies have found that tDCS over the dlPFC or vlPFC enhances cognitive reappraisal [141–143], others have not [143, 144].”
From Prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and threat processing: implications for PTSD (2022) · cites this paper as [144]
Other studies did not find that tDCS over the dlPFC or vlPFC enhances cognitive reappraisal.
“While some studies have found that tDCS over the dlPFC or vlPFC enhances cognitive reappraisal [141–143], others have not [143, 144].”
From Prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and threat processing: implications for PTSD (2022) · cites this paper as [144]
Cites
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Enhances Cognitive Control During Emotion Regulation
Feeser, M., Prehn, K., Kazzer, P., Mungee, A., & Bajbouj, M. (2014) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2013.08.006 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Critical role of the right VLPFC in emotional regulation of social exclusion: a tDCS study
He, Z., Lin, Y., Xia, L., Liu, Z., Zhang, D., & Elliott, R. (2018) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsy026 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Marques, L. M., Morello, L. Y. N., & Boggio, P. S. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-33711-5 · Cited by 59 · cited 3× · see citing works
“[3] Marques LM, Morello LYN, Boggio PS.”
BackgroundMethod
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and threat processing: implications for PTSD
Alexandra Kredlow, M., Fenster, R. J., Laurent, E. S., Ressler, K. J., & Phelps, E. A. (2022) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-021-01155-7 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
- Authors
- Vieira, L., Marques, D., Melo, L., Marques, R. C., Monte-Silva, K., & Cantilino, A.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Vieira, Larissa
- ORCID
- Venue
- Brain Stimulation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 650-652
- ISSN
- 1876-4754 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-861X
- OpenAlex
- W3004749336
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 0.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Brain stimulation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Keywords
- transcranial direct current stimulation, cognitive reappraisal, emotion regulation, detachment, reinterpretation, non-invasive brain stimulation, emotional impact
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
