Cited by 70EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningCommunication in Education and HealthcareEnglish Language Learning and Teaching

Can home use of speech-enabled artificial intelligence mitigate foreign language anxiety: investigation of a concept

Open access
Bao, Minhui·2019·Arab World English Journal

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The harmful effects of speech-related anxiety among learners and users of foreign language is well documented. Aiming to investigate the potential of reducing anxiety through ad libitum interaction with Artificial Intelligence chatbots, a controlled pilot study was conducted on East Asian staff of a large financial institution over a 4-week period, the sample of 40 divided between a test group using AI and the non-exposed subjects. Variety of measures were employed to gain as comprehensive an insight as warranted given the study limitations of a small sample, brief study period and relatively unsophisticated but freely available AI chatbot. The measures ranged from surveys of anxiety, attitudes toward daily chatbot usage, oral interviews and IELTS testing of English speaking ability. The results were cautiously encouraging: nearly universal endorsement of AI as a non-threatening interlocutor positively impacting subjects' confidence and to the extent limited by time constraint, enhancing individual components of the IELTS paradigm. Moreover, significant linear relationship between individual anxiety survey items and overall IELTS scores at baseline was observed, lending a measure of validity to the construct developed for the occasion. In summary, it is felt that subject to further development and refinement, conversationally enhanced AI chatbots hold a significant promise toward reducing speech-related anxieties and learning inhibitions of English as a foreign language and thus merit further investigation toward this objective.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.24093/awej/call5.3

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 8 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern language journal, 70(2), 125-132.
  2. MacIntyre, P. (1992). Anxiety, language learning and stages of processing (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of West Ontario, London, ON. Retrieved from https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/digitizedtheses/2155
  3. Occhipinti, A. (2009). Foreign language anxiety in in-class speaking activities (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
  4. Shawar, B. A., & Atwell, E. (2007, January). Chatbots: are they really useful?. In Ldv forum (Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 29-49).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bao, M.
Affiliations
Thammasat University (TH)
Corresponding author
Bao, Minhui
Venue
Arab World English Journal
Published
2019-07-15
Issue
5
Pages
28-40
ISSN
2229-9327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963430424
Cited by
70
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
12.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Arab World English Journal (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Communication in Education and Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › English Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
foreign language anxiety, speaking anxiety, AI chatbots, chatbots, English as a foreign language, learner confidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review