The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparative study of landslide susceptibility mapping with different recurrent neural networks
Abstract
Abstract This paper aims to use recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to perform landslide susceptibility mapping in Yongxin County, China. The two main contributions of this study are summarized as follows. First, the regular RNN is compared to its three variants in the case study of landslide susceptibility mapping for the first time, including long short term memory, gated recurrent unit and simple recurrent unit. Second, a sequential data representation method is proposed to fully explore the predicting potential of RNNs. The study area consists of 364 historical landslide locations that were divided into two parts: 255 (70%) for training and 109 (30%) for validation, and 16 landslide influencing factors were considered for spatial prediction. To validate the effectiveness of these RNN-related methods, several objective measures of accuracy, recall, F-measure, Matthews correlation coefficient and the receiver operating characteristic were used for evaluation. Experimental results demonstrate that very high and high susceptible areas are concentrated in the northwest and south of Yongxin County, while landslides in the central area are less prone to occur. Based on quantitative results, all the RNN-related methods achieved area under the curve values above 0.83 and produced accurate prediction results with the optimized parameters. Therefore, the RNN framework can be used as a useful tool for the landslide susceptibility mapping task to mitigate and manage landslides.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks
Hinton, G. E., & Salakhutdinov, R. R. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1127647 · Cited by 20,928
A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors
O’brien, R. M. (2007) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6 · Cited by 11,217
Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modeling
Chung, J., Gulcehre, C., Cho, K., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.3555 · Cited by 11,008
On the Properties of Neural Machine Translation: Encoder–Decoder Approaches
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Bahdanau, D., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of SSST-8, Eighth Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Structure in Statistical Translation · doi:10.3115/v1/w14-4012 · Cited by 7,099
Evaluation: from precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation
Powers, D. M. W. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.16061 · Cited by 5,440
Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme
Matthews, B. W. (1975) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure · doi:10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 · Cited by 5,399
Long-term recurrent convolutional networks for visual recognition and description
Donahue, J., Hendricks, L. A., Guadarrama, S., Rohrbach, M., Venugopalan, S., Darrell, T., & Saenko, K. (2015) · 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2015.7298878 · Cited by 5,228
Combining Pattern Classifiers: Methods and Algorithms
Bagui, S. C. (2005) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2005.s320 · Cited by 3,202
Supervised Sequence Labelling with Recurrent Neural Networks
Graves, A. (2012) · Studies in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-24797-2 · Cited by 3,120
Cited by
Evaluation of deep learning algorithms for national scale landslide susceptibility mapping of Iran
Thi Ngo, P. T., Panahi, M., Khosravi, K., Ghorbanzadeh, O., Kariminejad, N., Cerda, A., & Lee, S. (2021) · Geoscience Frontiers · doi:10.1016/j.gsf.2020.06.013 · Cited by 406
Fang, Z., Wang, Y., Peng, L., & Hong, H. (2020) · Computers & Geosciences · doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104470 · Cited by 322
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Fang, Z., Wang, M., Peng, L., & Hong, H.
- Venue
- Computers & Geosciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 138
- Pages
- 104445
- ISSN
- 0098-3004 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3005741980
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 49.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative study of landslide susceptibility mapping with different recurrent neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104445
- The paper
- Wang, Y., Fang, Z., Wang, M., Peng, L., & Hong, H. (2020). Comparative study of landslide susceptibility mapping with different recurrent neural networks. Computers & Geosciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104445
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.