Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparative study of landslide susceptibility mapping with different recurrent neural networks

Wang, Yi, Fang, Zhice, Wang, Mao, Peng, Ling, Hong, Haoyuan·2020·Computers & Geosciences

Abstract

Abstract This paper aims to use recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to perform landslide susceptibility mapping in Yongxin County, China. The two main contributions of this study are summarized as follows. First, the regular RNN is compared to its three variants in the case study of landslide susceptibility mapping for the first time, including long short term memory, gated recurrent unit and simple recurrent unit. Second, a sequential data representation method is proposed to fully explore the predicting potential of RNNs. The study area consists of 364 historical landslide locations that were divided into two parts: 255 (70%) for training and 109 (30%) for validation, and 16 landslide influencing factors were considered for spatial prediction. To validate the effectiveness of these RNN-related methods, several objective measures of accuracy, recall, F-measure, Matthews correlation coefficient and the receiver operating characteristic were used for evaluation. Experimental results demonstrate that very high and high susceptible areas are concentrated in the northwest and south of Yongxin County, while landslides in the central area are less prone to occur. Based on quantitative results, all the RNN-related methods achieved area under the curve values above 0.83 and produced accurate prediction results with the optimized parameters. Therefore, the RNN framework can be used as a useful tool for the landslide susceptibility mapping task to mitigate and manage landslides.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104445

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Wang, Y., Fang, Z., Wang, M., Peng, L., & Hong, H.
Venue
Computers & Geosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
138
Pages
104445
ISSN
0098-3004 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3005741980
Cited by
268
References
69
FWCI
49.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparative study of landslide susceptibility mapping with different recurrent neural networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104445
The paper
Wang, Y., Fang, Z., Wang, M., Peng, L., & Hong, H. (2020). Comparative study of landslide susceptibility mapping with different recurrent neural networks. Computers & Geosciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2020.104445

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.