Cited by 25Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchSleep and related disordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Cognitive behavior therapy for relatively active and for passive chronic fatigue syndrome patients

Bazelmans, Ellen, Prins, Judith, Bleijenberg, Gijs·2006·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpra.2006.02.001

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bazelmans, E., Prins, J., & Bleijenberg, G.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
157-166
ISSN
1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128535598
Cited by
25
References
31
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, chronic fatigue syndrome, treatment response, treatment outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review