Cited by 20Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome ResearchLong-Term Effects of COVID-19Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Mental quality of life in chronic fatigue is associated with an accommodative coping style and neuroticism: a path analysis

Poppe, Carine, Crombez, Geert, Hanoulle, Ignace, Vogelaers, Dirk, Petrovic, Mirko·2012·Quality of Life Research

Abstract

Purpose An accommodative coping style (e.g. acceptance) is related to a better mental health-related quality of life (MHQL) in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). We want to explore whether neuroticism is predictive for this coping style and MHQL. Secondly we want to explore the relation between acceptance and physical health-related quality of life (PHQL) and expect that illness-related variables such as fatigue severity and duration are related to PHQL.Method In this cross-sectional study, 117 patients with chronic fatigue syndrome from an outpatient internal medicine clinic completed self-report questionnaires on quality of life (SF-36), acceptance (ICQ), personality traits (NEO-FFI) and fatigue severity (CIS).Results Regression analyses showed that neuroticism and acceptance are predictors of MHQL (38% of the variance was explained). The path analysis showed that acceptance mediates between neuroticism and MHQL and that PHQL is related to MHQL. PHQL is related to fatigue severity and duration, but not to neuroticism and acceptance.Conclusion Stimulating an 'accepting accommodative coping style' within the treatment for CFS is important in improving mental quality of life. Our results suggest that neuroticism may be negatively related to acceptance and MHQL. This findings support the idea that a psychological diagnostic workout with special attention to personality traits in relation to their coping style is recommended in order to choose the most appropriate therapeutic approach in this population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11136-011-0048-8

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poppe, C., Crombez, G., Hanoulle, I., Vogelaers, D., & Petrovic, M.
Affiliations
  • Ghent University Hospital (BE)
  • Ghent University (BE)
Corresponding author
Poppe, Carine
Venue
Quality of Life Research
Published
2011-10-29
Volume
21
Issue
8
Pages
1337-1345
ISSN
  • 0962-9343 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2649
OpenAlex
W1970501813
Cited by
19
References
68
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Quality of Life Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
chronic fatigue syndrome, mental health-related quality of life, physical health-related quality of life, acceptance, neuroticism, personality traits, fatigue severity, mediation
MeSH terms
Neuroticism, Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Personality Tests, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors, Statistics as Topic, Stress, Psychological, Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review