Cited by 149Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersPerfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Insight-Related Challenges in the Treatment of Hoarding

Frost, Randy O., Tolin, David F., Maltby, Nicholas·2010·Cognitive and Behavioral Practice

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cbpra.2009.07.004

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frost, R. O., Tolin, D. F., & Maltby, N.
Affiliations
  • Smith College (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Frost, Randy O.
Venue
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-11
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
404-413
ISSN
1077-7229 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2083592030
Cited by
149
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 6
FWCI
19.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive and Behavioral Practice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
hoarding, insight, cognitive behavioral therapy, anosognosia, defensiveness, treatment challenges, hoarding disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review