Cited by 8Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlOptical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques

Evaluation of the performance of a new OptiScanner™ 5000 system for an intermittent glucose monitoring

Barassi, Alessandra, Umbrello, Michele, Ghilardi, Francesca, Damele, Clara Anna Linda, Massaccesi, Luca, Iapichino, Gaetano, Melzi d’Eril, Gian Vico·2015·Clinica Chimica Acta

Abstract

Background Mid-infrared spectral technology has shown a high degree of promise in detecting glucose in plasma. OptiScan Biomedical has developed a glucose monitor based on mid-infrared spectroscopy that withdraws blood samples and measures plasma glucose. The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and performance of the OptiScanner™ 5000 system on different pools of blood. Methods This study was performed to validate the blood glucose measurements obtained with the OptiScanner™ 5000 by comparing them to Central Laboratory glucose measurements (VITROS® 5600 Integrated System) as a comparative method across a broad range of glucose values over a three day period to obtain 80-90 paired measurements. Results A total of 81 paired measurements, distributed between 33 and 320mg/100mL of glucose, were performed. The aggregate data points were within International Organization for Standardization standards, with 100% of the glucose values within ±15%. Conclusions The current study suggests that a mid-IR fixed-wavelength system (OptiScanner) can measure glucose accurately across a wide range of glucose values in plasma of ICU patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cca.2014.09.008

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The accuracy reported here for the Contour Next Link 2.4 BGMS is similar to or higher than the other glucose monitoring systems.

    “It is difficult to make direct comparisons due to differences in methods among these studies; however, the accuracy reported here for the Contour ® Next Link 2.4 BGMS is similar to or higher than the other glucose monitoring systems.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barassi, A., Umbrello, M., Ghilardi, F., Damele, C. A. L., Massaccesi, L., Iapichino, G., & Melzi d’Eril, G. V.
Affiliations
University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Barassi, Alessandra
Venue
Clinica Chimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-01
Volume
438
Pages
252-254
ISSN
0009-8981 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2016738082
Cited by
8
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinica Chimica Acta (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
Keywords
mid-infrared spectroscopy, point-of-care glucose testing, method comparison, intensive care unit patients, blood glucose
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Humans, Monitoring, Physiologic, Spectrophotometry, Infrared, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review