Cited by 1,560Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patientsAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Randomized trial of insulin-glucose infusion followed by subcutaneous insulin treatment in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction (DIGAMI study): effects on mortality at 1 year

Open access
Malmberg, Klas, Rydén, Lars, Efendic, Suad, Herlitz, Johan, Nicol, Peter, Waldenstrom, Anders, Wedel, Hans, Welin, Lennart·1995·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives We tested how insulin-glucose infusion followed by multidose insulin treatment in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction affected mortality during the subsequent 12 months of follow-up.Background Despite significant improvements in acute coronary care, diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction still have a high mortality rate.Methods A total of 620 patients were studied: 306 randomized to treatment with insulin-glucose infusion followed by multidose subcutaneous insulin for > or = 3 months and 314 to conventional therapy.Results The two groups were well matched for baseline characteristics. Blood glucose decreased from 15.4 +/- 4.1 to 9.6 +/- 3.3 mmol/liter (mean +/- SD) in the infusion group during the 1st 24 h, and from 15.7 +/- 4.2 to 11.7 +/- 4.1 among control patients (p < 0.0001). After 1 year 57 subjects (18.6%) in the infusion group and 82 (26.1%) in the control group had died (relative mortality reduction 29%, p = 0.027). The mortality reduction was particularly evident in patients who had a low cardiovascular risk profile and no previous insulin treatment (3-month mortality rate 6.5% in the infusion group vs. 13.5% in the control group [relative reduction 52%, p = 0.046]; 1-year mortality rate 8.6% in the infusion group vs. 18.0% in the control group [relative reduction 52%, p = 0.020]).Conclusions Insulin-glucose infusion followed by a multidose insulin regimen improved long-term prognosis in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00126-k

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have shown that adequate glycaemic control improves the prognosis of patients with ACS, while also demonstrating the importance of avoiding hypoglycaemia, which is strongly associated with worse outcomes.

    “Other studies have shown that adequate glycaemic control improves the prognosis of patients with ACS, while also demonstrating the importance of avoiding hypoglycaemia, which is strongly associated with worse outcomes.423,424”
  • Mean blood glucose in the intensive insulin intervention arm of DIGAMI was 172.8 mg/dl, compared with 210.6 mg/dl in the conventional group.

    “Mean blood glucose in the intensive insulin intervention arm was 172.8 mg/dl (9.6 mmol/l), compared with 210.6 mg/dl (11.7 mmol/l) in the “conventional” group.”

    From Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2009 (2009) · cites this paper as [320]

  • The broad range of blood glucose levels within each arm of DIGAMI limits the ability to define specific blood glucose target thresholds.

    “The broad range of blood glucose levels within each arm limits the ability to define specific blood glucose target thresholds.”

    From Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2009 (2009) · cites this paper as [320]

  • In the initial DIGAMI study, insulin-glucose infusion followed by at least 3 months of subcutaneous insulin treatment in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction improved long-term survival.

    “In the initial Diabetes and Insulin-Glucose Infusion in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DIGAMI) study (319,320), insulin-glucose infusion followed by at least 3 months of subcutaneous insulin treatment in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction improved long-term survival.”

    From Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2009 (2009) · cites this paper as [320]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Henning R. Swedish co-operative CCU study [PhD thesis, Gothenburg University]. Gothenburg, Sweden, 1975.
  2. Beta-blocker Heart Attack Trial Research Group. A randomised trial of propranolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction. I. Mortality results. JAMA 1982;287:1707-14.
  3. Barbash GL White HD, Modan M, Van de Wcrf F. Significancc of diabetcs mellitus in patients with acute myocardial infarction receiving thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coil Cardiol 1993;22:707-13.
  4. Deacon S, Karunanayake A. Barnett D. Acebutolol, atcnolol and proprano- Iol and metabolic responses to acute hypoglycaemia in diabetes. Br Med J 1977;2:1255-7.
  5. Lager I. Smith U, Blohme G. Effect of cardioselective and nonselective ¢3-blockade on the hypoglycemic response in insulin dependent diabetes. Lancet 1979;1:458-62.
  6. Abramson E, Arky R, Woeber K. Effects of propranolol on the hormonal and the metabolic responses to hypoglycemia. Lancet 1966;2:1386-90.
  7. Corrall R, Frier B, Davidson N, French E. Hormonal and substrate responses during recovery, from hypoglycemia during/31-selective and non- selective beta-adrenergic blockade. Eur J Clin Invest 1981;11:279-83.
  8. Taylor S, Saxton C, Majid P, Dykes J, Ghosh P, Stoker J. Insulin secretion ti~llowing myocardial infarction. Lancet 1969; 1:1373-8.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malmberg, K., Rydén, L., Efendic, S., Herlitz, J., Nicol, P., Waldenstrom, A., Wedel, H., & Welin, L.
Affiliations
Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Malmberg, Klas
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-07
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
57-65
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027702390
Cited by
1,560
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 62 · 2012: 58
FWCI
16.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
glucose-insulin infusion, subcutaneous insulin therapy, acute myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, mortality, long-term prognosis, glycemic control, cardiovascular risk profile
MeSH terms
Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Glucose, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Injections, Subcutaneous, Insulin, Male, Myocardial Infarction, Survival Analysis, Hospital Mortality, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review