Cited by 39Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersGenetic factors in colorectal cancerImmunotherapy and Immune Responses

Genetic and pharmacological modulation of DNA mismatch repair heterogeneous tumors promotes immune surveillance

Open access
Amodio, Vito, Lamba, Simona, Chilà, Rosaria, Cattaneo, Chiara M., Mussolin, Benedetta, Corti, Giorgio, Rospo, Giuseppe, Berrino, Enrico +11 more·2023·Cancer Cell

Abstract

Patients affected by colorectal cancer (CRC) with DNA mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd), often respond to immune checkpoint blockade therapies, while those with mismatch repair-proficient (MMRp) tumors generally do not. Interestingly, a subset of MMRp CRCs contains variable fractions of MMRd cells, but it is unknown how their presence impacts immune surveillance. We asked whether modulation of the MMRd fraction in MMR heterogeneous tumors acts as an endogenous cancer vaccine by promoting immune surveillance. To test this hypothesis, we use isogenic MMRp ( Mlh1 +/+ ) and MMRd ( Mlh1 −/− ) mouse CRC cells. MMRp/MMRd cells mixed at different ratios are injected in immunocompetent mice and tumor rejection is observed when at least 50% of cells are MMRd. To enrich the MMRd fraction, MMRp/MMRd tumors are treated with 6-thioguanine, which leads to tumor rejection. These results suggest that genetic and pharmacological modulation of the DNA mismatch repair machinery potentiate the immunogenicity of MMR heterogeneous tumors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ccell.2022.12.003

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Enrichment of dMMR clones can be achieved by treatment with chemotherapeutics such as temozolomide and 6-thioguanine, to which dMMR tumour cells show higher intrinsic resistance than pMMR cells.

    “Enrichment of dMMR clones can be achieved by treatment with chemotherapeutics such as temozolomide (TMZ) and 6-Thioguanine, to which dMMR tumour cells show higher intrinsic resistance than pMMR cells.153”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amodio, V., Lamba, S., Chilà, R., Cattaneo, C. M., Mussolin, B., Corti, G., Rospo, G., Berrino, E., Tripodo, C., Pisati, F., Bartolini, A., Aquilano, M. C., Marsoni, S., Mauri, G., Marchiò, C., Abrignani, S., Di Nicolantonio, F., Germano, G., & Bardelli, A.
Affiliations
  • Candiolo Cancer Institute (IT)
  • IFOM (IT)
  • Cogentech S.R.L. Società Benefit a Socio Unico soggetta all’attività di direzione e coordinamento di IFOM - Istituto Fondazione di Oncologia Molecolare ETS (Italy) (IT)
  • Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Germano, Giovanni
  • Bardelli, Alberto
Venue
Cancer Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-01
Volume
41
Issue
1
Pages
196-209.e5
ISSN
1535-6108 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4313266792
Cited by
39
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS UniPA (University of Palermo) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • European Research Council
  • Fundacion Cientifica de la Asociacion Espaoola Contra el Cancer
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (22795)
  • Università degli Studi di Torino
  • Innovative Medicines Initiative (101007937 PERSIST-SEQ)
  • Cancer Research UK
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (101020342)
  • Fondazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro Airc
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
Keywords
mismatch repair deficiency, colorectal cancer, tumor heterogeneity, immune surveillance, immune checkpoint blockade, MLH1, 6-thioguanine, tumor immunogenicity, tumor rejection
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain Neoplasms, Neoplastic Syndromes, Hereditary, Colorectal Neoplasms, Mice, Microsatellite Instability, DNA Mismatch Repair

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review