Cited by 418Cancer-related Molecular PathwaysDNA Repair MechanismsChromatin Remodeling and Cancer

Gain of function of mutant p53: The mutant p53/NF-Y protein complex reveals an aberrant transcriptional mechanism of cell cycle regulation

Open access
Di Agostino, Silvia, Strano, Sabrina, Emiliozzi, Velia, Zerbini, Valentina, Mottolese, Marcella, Sacchi, Ada, Blandino, Giovanni, Piaggio, Giulia·2006·Cancer Cell

Abstract

This article investigates the mechanistic aspects of mutant p53 "gain of function" in response to DNA damage. We show that mutant forms of p53 protein interact with NF-Y. The expression of cyclin A, cyclin B1, cdk1, and cdc25C, as well as the cdk1-associated kinase activities, is upregulated after DNA damage, provoking a mutant p53/NF-Y-dependent increase in DNA synthesis. Mutant p53 binds NF-Y target promoters and, upon DNA damage, recruits p300, leading to histone acetylation. The recruitment of mutant p53 to the CCAAT sites is severely impaired upon abrogation of NF-YA expression. Endogenous NF-Y, mutant p53, and p300 proteins form a triple complex upon DNA damage. We demonstrate that aberrant transcriptional regulation underlies the ability of mutant p53 proteins to act as oncogenic factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.08.013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • GOF mut-p53 exhibits interactions with distinct transcription factors (e.g., NF-ɣ, SREBP, VDR, Sp1, ETS2, NFR2, p73, p63) that promote tumor initiation and progression.

    “In contrast to wt-p53, GOF mut-p53 exhibits interactions with distinct transcription factors (e.g., NF-ɣ, SREBP, VDR, Sp1, ETS2, NFR2, p73, p63) that promote tumor initiation and progression [13,72,73,74,75,76,77].”

    From The p53 Pathway in Glioblastoma (2018) · cites this paper as [74]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Di Agostino, S., Strano, S., Emiliozzi, V., Zerbini, V., Mottolese, M., Sacchi, A., Blandino, G., & Piaggio, G.
Affiliations
Instituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena (IT)
Corresponding author
Blandino, Giovanni
Venue
Cancer Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-09
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
191-202
ISSN
1535-6108 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041383414
Cited by
418
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 23
FWCI
9.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
Keywords
mutant p53, gain-of-function, NF-Y, P300, histone acetylation, DNA damage response, cell cycle regulation, cyclin A, cyclin B1, CDK1, Cdc25C, transcriptional regulation, oncogenic p53
MeSH terms
Base Sequence, Cell Cycle, DNA Damage, Humans, Mutation, Protein Binding, Transcription, Genetic, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, CCAAT-Binding Factor, Cell Line, Tumor, p300-CBP Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review