Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 317

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 210 of the 210 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Engineering of relevant photodynamic processes through structural modifications of metallotetrapyrrolic photosensitizers

Open access
Dąbrowski, Janusz M., Pucelik, Barbara, Regiel-Futyra, Anna, Brindell, Małgorzata, Mazuryk, Olga, Kyzioł, Agnieszka, Stochel, Grażyna, Macyk, Wojciech, Arnaut, Luis G.·2016·Coordination Chemistry Reviews

Abstract

Abstract Applications of metalloporphyrins and related molecules have been extensively pursued in the context of photodynamic therapy of cancer (PDT) and other biomedical applications. This review discusses photophysical and photochemical properties of metalloporphyrins and their analogues, such as metallochlorins, metallobacteriochlorins and metallophthalocyanines that are relevant for photodynamic processes. We specially emphasize the search for sensitizers strongly absorbing in phototherapeutic window (650–850 nm), the most penetrating and least harmful radiation to human tissues. Molecular engineering is guided by the understanding of the influence of the central metal ion and substituents on the electronic structure and photophysical properties of these compounds. The effects of the structural modifications are elucidated via studies of the electronic absorption and emission spectra, fluorescence and triplet state lifetimes and quantum yields, as well as quantum yields of singlet oxygen generation. The interaction between electronically excited (metallo)porphyrin derivatives and molecular oxygen is specially highlighted, because it leads to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), the major players in photomedicine and photocatalysis. The parameters analysed and correlated encompass photophysical and electrochemical properties, cellular uptake and localization of the photosensitizer, as well as the mechanism of photodynamically induced cell death. The factors that determine the efficacy of PDT (drug and light doses, drug to light interval, oxygen concentration and tumour margin) are also emphasized. This review explores the most recent research performed on metalloporphyrin-based materials in photodynamic therapy, photodynamic inactivation of microorganisms, photodiagnosis and drug delivery, demonstrating their perspectives for biomedical applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.06.007

Cites

210 of 210 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 210 references

Cited by

See all 317

Metadata

Authors
Dąbrowski, J. M., Pucelik, B., Regiel-Futyra, A., Brindell, M., Mazuryk, O., Kyzioł, A., Stochel, G., Macyk, W., & Arnaut, L. G.
Venue
Coordination Chemistry Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
325
Pages
67-101
ISSN
0010-8545 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2422074017
Cited by
317
References
210
FWCI
20.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineering of relevant photodynamic processes through structural modifications of metallotetrapyrrolic photosensitizers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ccr.2016.06.007
The paper
Dąbrowski, J. M., Pucelik, B., Regiel-Futyra, A., Brindell, M., Mazuryk, O., Kyzioł, A., Stochel, G., Macyk, W., & Arnaut, L. G. (2016). Engineering of relevant photodynamic processes through structural modifications of metallotetrapyrrolic photosensitizers. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2016.06.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.