Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 267

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 150 of the 150 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prussian blue analogues and their derived nanomaterials for electrocatalytic water splitting

Cao, Li-Ming, Lu, David, Zhong, Di-Chang, Lu, Tong-Bu·2020·Coordination Chemistry Reviews

Abstract

Abstract The electrocatalytic water splitting is considered as a prospect meaning to address the urgent energy and environmental problems. However, the electrocatalytic water splitting is greatly limited by the high overpotentials of hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER). Especially, OER involves a complex multistep proton-coupled electron transfer process, which demands a high overpotential to accelerate this sluggish oxygen evolution kinetics. The high overpotentials for OER significantly decrease the efficiency of the overall water splitting. The OER half reaction has thus become the bottleneck of electrocatalytic overall water splitting. It is vital to synthesize highly active electrocatalysts to reduce the activation energy of the reaction and accelerate the generation of H2 and O2, thereby improving the efficiency of the overall water splitting. Prussian blue analogues (PBAs) are representative cyanide-based coordination polymer materials. PBAs possess open framework structures, large specific surface areas, adjustable metal active sites and uniform catalytic centers, showing promising application in electrocatalytic water splitting. Besides, benefiting from the unique structural features of PBAs, their derived electrocatalysts also have large specific surface areas and uniform active sites. Moreover, PBAs can serve as carbon and nitrogen sources. The doped N can regulate the electronic structure of surface active sites, enhancing the intrinsic activity of electrocatalysts. Therefore, the PBA-derived electrocatalysts also exhibit good catalytic performance for water splitting. In this review, we not only summarize the most recent advances on PBAs and their derivatives as electrocatalysts for water splitting, but also conclude the core scientific challenges faced in water splitting. Finally, we provide perspectives for the future research in this field, including catalyst design, catalytic system establishment and so on.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213156

Cites

150 of 150 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 150 references

Cited by

See all 267

Metadata

Authors
Cao, L.-M., Lu, D., Zhong, D.-C., & Lu, T.-B.
Venue
Coordination Chemistry Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
407
Pages
213156
ISSN
0010-8545 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2997734207
Cited by
267
References
150
FWCI
5.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prussian blue analogues and their derived nanomaterials for electrocatalytic water splitting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213156
The paper
Cao, L.-M., Lu, D., Zhong, D.-C., & Lu, T.-B. (2020). Prussian blue analogues and their derived nanomaterials for electrocatalytic water splitting. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2019.213156

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.