Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 223 of the 223 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A historical perspective on porphyrin-based metal–organic frameworks and their applications

Open access
Zhang, Xuan, Wasson, Megan C., Shayan, Mohsen, Berdichevsky, Ellan K., Ricardo-Noordberg, Joseph, Singh, Zujhar, Papazyan, Edgar K., Castro, Anthony J., Marino, Paola, Ajoyan, Zvart, Chen, Zhijie, Islamoglu, Timur, Howarth, Ashlee J., Liu, Yangyang, Majewski, Marek B., Katz, Michael J., Mondloch, Joseph E., Farha, Omar K.·2021·Coordination Chemistry Reviews

Abstract

Porphyrins are important molecules widely found in nature in the form of enzyme active sites and visible light absorption units. Recent interest in using these functional molecules as building blocks for the construction of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have rapidly increased due to the ease in which the locations of, and the distances between, the porphyrin units can be controlled in these porous crystalline materials. Porphyrin-based MOFs with atomically precise structures provide an ideal platform for the investigation of their structure–function relationships in the solid state without compromising accessibility to the inherent properties of the porphyrin building blocks. This review will provide a historical overview of the development and applications of porphyrin-based MOFs from early studies focused on design and structures, to recent efforts on their utilization in biomimetic catalysis, photocatalysis, electrocatalysis, sensing, and biomedical applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213615

Cites

223 of 223 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Show all 223 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, X., Wasson, M. C., Shayan, M., Berdichevsky, E. K., Ricardo-Noordberg, J., Singh, Z., Papazyan, E. K., Castro, A. J., Marino, P., Ajoyan, Z., Chen, Z., Islamoglu, T., Howarth, A. J., Liu, Y., Majewski, M. B., Katz, M. J., Mondloch, J. E., & Farha, O. K.
Venue
Coordination Chemistry Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-02
Volume
429
Pages
213615
ISSN
0010-8545 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3094359911
Cited by
300
References
223
FWCI
20.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A historical perspective on porphyrin-based metal–organic frameworks and their applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213615
The paper
Zhang, X., Wasson, M. C., Shayan, M., Berdichevsky, E. K., Ricardo-Noordberg, J., Singh, Z., Papazyan, E. K., Castro, A. J., Marino, P., Ajoyan, Z., Chen, Z., Islamoglu, T., Howarth, A. J., Liu, Y., Majewski, M. B., Katz, M. J., Mondloch, J. E., & Farha, O. K. (2021). A historical perspective on porphyrin-based metal–organic frameworks and their applications. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213615

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.