Cited by 310Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Study design of ASPirin in Reducing Events in the Elderly (ASPREE): A randomized, controlled trial

Open access
ASPREE Investigator Group·2013·Contemporary Clinical Trials

Abstract

Cost-effective strategies to maintain healthy active lifestyle in aging populations are required to address the global burden of age-related diseases. ASPREE will examine whether the potential primary prevention benefits of low dose aspirin outweigh the risks in older healthy individuals. Our primary hypothesis is that daily oral 100 mg enteric-coated aspirin will extend a composite primary endpoint termed 'disability-free life' including onset of dementia, total mortality, or persistent disability in at least one of the Katz Activities of Daily Living in 19,000 healthy participants aged 65 years and above ('US minorities') and 70 years and above (non-'US minorities'). ASPREE is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of oral 100mg enteric-coated acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) or matching placebo being conducted in Australian and US community settings on individuals free of dementia, disability and cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. Secondary endpoints are all-cause and cause specific mortality, fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events, fatal and non-fatal cancer (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer), dementia, mild cognitive impairment, depression, physical disability, and clinically significant bleeding. To 20 September 2013 14,383 participants have been recruited. Recruitment and study completion are anticipated in July 2014 and December 2018 respectively. In contrast to other aspirin trials that have largely focused on cardiovascular endpoints, ASPREE has a unique composite primary endpoint to better capture the overall risk and benefit of aspirin to extend healthy independent lifespan in older adults in the US and Australia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cct.2013.09.014

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]National Center for Health Statistics Health, United States, 2011: With Special Feature on Socioeconomic Status and Health Hyattsville, MD 2012 Accessed at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hus/hus11.pdf#024 16 May 2013 22812021

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ASPREE Investigator Group
Corresponding author
ASPREE Investigator Group
Venue
Contemporary Clinical Trials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-11
Volume
36
Issue
2
Pages
555-564
ISSN
1551-7144 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1533850659
Cited by
310
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Contemporary Clinical Trials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania) (submittedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Institute on Aging (U01AG029824, P30AG028740, P30AG024832, P30AG044271)
  • National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
low-dose aspirin, primary prevention, older adults, dementia, mortality, cardiovascular events, cancer, bleeding risk, activities of daily living, healthy aging
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Aspirin, Australia, Cardiovascular Diseases, Dementia, Depression, Double-Blind Method, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Humans, Male, Mortality, Neoplasms, Tablets, Enteric-Coated, United States, Risk Assessment, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review