Cited by 69Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesVitamin D Research StudiesPsoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis

The Vitamin D to Ameliorate Multiple Sclerosis (VIDAMS) trial: Study design for a multicenter, randomized, double-blind controlled trial of vitamin D in multiple sclerosis

Bhargava, Pavan, Cassard, Sandra, Steele, Sonya U., Azevedo, Christina, Pelletier, Daniel, Sugar, Elizabeth A., Waubant, Emmanuelle, Mowry, Ellen M.·2014·Contemporary Clinical Trials

Abstract

Background Lower levels of vitamin D are associated with increased MS risk and with greater clinical and brain MRI activity in established relapsing MS. Objective The VIDAMS trial (NCT01490502) is evaluating whether high-dose vitamin D supplementation reduces the risk of MS activity. Design/methods Eligibility criteria include diagnosis of RRMS, age 18 to 50 years, and Expanded Disability Status Scale ≤4.0. Disease duration and activity requirements depend on whether 2005 or 2010 criteria are used for diagnosis. Enrollment is restricted based on prior MS therapy exposure and recent vitamin D use. After completing a one-month run-in of glatiramer acetate, 172 patients will be randomized 1:1 to oral vitamin D(3) 5000 IU versus 600 IU daily. Clinical visits occur every 12 weeks for 96 weeks. Results Sixteen sites throughout the United States are participating in the trial. Complete enrollment is expected by late 2014, with follow-up through 2016. No interim analyses are planned. The primary outcome for the trial is the proportion of patients experiencing a relapse in each group. Other clinical, patient-reported, and MRI outcomes will be evaluated. Conclusions The VIDAMS trial will provide critical information about the safety and efficacy of vitamin D therapy in RRMS, with implications for MS patients worldwide.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cct.2014.10.004

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The null MR result for serum 25OHD agrees with inconclusive results of randomized trials of vitamin D supplementation in MS.

    “This agrees with the inconclusive results of randomized trials of vitamin D supplementation in MS46 and a recent prospective study that found no association between BMI and clinical disability47.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhargava, P., Cassard, S., Steele, S. U., Azevedo, C., Pelletier, D., Sugar, E. A., Waubant, E., & Mowry, E. M.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Mowry, Ellen M.
Venue
Contemporary Clinical Trials
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
39
Issue
2
Pages
288-293
ISSN
1551-7144 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145940256
Cited by
69
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 11
FWCI
8.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Contemporary Clinical Trials (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Multiple Sclerosis Society (RG-4407A2/1, FP-1787A1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Vitamin D Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
Keywords
vitamin D supplementation, multiple sclerosis, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, relapse prevention, glatiramer acetate, MRI activity, Expanded Disability Status Scale
MeSH terms
Glatiramer Acetate, Adolescent, Adult, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Peptides, Prospective Studies, Research Design, United States, Vitamin D, Dietary Supplements, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review