The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Post-combustion CO2 capture with a commercial activated carbon: Comparison of different regeneration strategies
Open accessAbstract
Abstract A commercial activated carbon supplied by Norit, R2030CO2, was evaluated as CO 2 adsorbent under conditions relevant to post-combustion CO 2 capture (ambient pressure and diluted CO 2 ). It has been demonstrated that this carbon possesses sufficient CO 2 /N 2 selectivity in order to efficiently separate a binary mixture composed of 17% CO 2 in N 2 . Moreover, this carbon was easily completely regenerated and it did not show capacity decay after 10 consecutive cycles. Three different regeneration strategies were compared in a single-bed adsorption unit: temperature swing adsorption (TSA), vacuum swing adsorption (VSA) and a combination of them, vacuum and temperature swing adsorption (VTSA). Through a simple two step TSA cycle, CO 2 was concentrated from 17 to 43 vol%. For the single-bed cycle configurations, the productivity and CO 2 recovery followed the sequence: TSA −1 h −1 and a maximum CO 2 recovery of 97% were reached.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Reducing the Cost of CO 2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Pressure Swing Adsorption
Ho, M. T., Allinson, G. W., & Wiley, D. E. (2008) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/ie070831e · Cited by 566
Cycle Development and Design for CO 2 Capture from Flue Gas by Vacuum Swing Adsorption
Zhang, J., & Webley, P. A. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0706854 · Cited by 132
Cited by
A Review of CO2 Capture by Absorption and Adsorption
Yu, C.-H., Huang, C.-H., & Tan, C.-S. (2012) · Aerosol and Air Quality Research · doi:10.4209/aaqr.2012.05.0132 · Cited by 1,730
Biogas as a renewable energy fuel – A review of biogas upgrading, utilisation and storage
Ullah Khan, I., Hafiz Dzarfan Othman, M., Hashim, H., Matsuura, T., Ismail, A. F., Rezaei-DashtArzhandi, M., & Wan Azelee, I. (2017) · Energy Conversion and Management · doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2017.08.035 · Cited by 775
Air as the renewable carbon source of the future: an overview of CO2 capture from the atmosphere
Goeppert, A., Czaun, M., Surya Prakash, G. K., & Olah, G. A. (2012) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee21586a · Cited by 724
A review on solid adsorbents for carbon dioxide capture
Lee, S.-Y., & Park, S.-J. (2015) · Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jiec.2014.09.001 · Cited by 707
Adsorption of Carbon Dioxide for post-combustion capture: a review
Raganati, F., Miccio, F., & Ammendola, P. (2021) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c01618 · Cited by 661
Metadata
- Authors
- Plaza, M. G., García, S., Rubiera, F., Pis, J. J., & Pevida, C.
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 41-47
- ISSN
- 1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2010718152
- Cited by
- 365
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post-combustion CO2 capture with a commercial activated carbon: Comparison of different regeneration strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cej.2010.07.030
- The paper
- Plaza, M. G., García, S., Rubiera, F., Pis, J. J., & Pevida, C. (2010). Post-combustion CO2 capture with a commercial activated carbon: Comparison of different regeneration strategies. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2010.07.030
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
