The DOI matches its Crossref record; 190 of the 190 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sulfate radicals-based advanced oxidation technology in various environmental remediation: A state-of-the–art review
Abstract
Abstract Sulfate radicals are well-known for their strong oxidation potential (2.60 V), their high reaction rate (106–109 M/s) and longer life span (t1/2 = 30–40 μs). Owing to the revealed impact it is accomplished by oxidizing, many pesticides, dye, and heavy organic substances such as waste activated sludge (WAS) in a very short time duration. In this review, current research exploration, novel encounters, long pathway of sulfate radicals travelling in environmental management and commercial implementation prominence to persulfate oxidation process are abridged and revealed. A broad evaluation analysis intended in this review established its mesmerizing ascendancies over the conventional persulfate oxidation process with respect to rapid, more efficient, broad pH range and outstanding reaction. Regardless of the abundant improvement attained earlier, there are still several challenges for persulfate activation through transition metals such as heavy metal deposit, metal leaching, removal of sulfate, reusability, etc. To tackle the overhead complications, a novel scenario catalyst with a non-radical pathway, i.e. carbon-grounded catalyst (activated carbon, graphene oxide, biochar, etc.) is under extensive trials. The challenge and practical problems faced in the course of sulfate radical usage are deliberated and the upcoming need for a study to promote full-scale implementations of those approaches are proposed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pignatello, J. J., Oliveros, E., & MacKay, A. (2006) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643380500326564 · Cited by 4,133
Rate Constants for Reactions of Inorganic Radicals in Aqueous Solution
Neta, P., Huie, R. E., & Ross, A. B. (1988) · Journal of Physical and Chemical Reference Data · doi:10.1063/1.555808 · Cited by 3,651
Sheng, G.-P., Yu, H.-Q., & Li, X.-Y. (2010) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.08.001 · Cited by 3,113
A review of classic Fenton’s peroxidation as an advanced oxidation technique
Neyens, E., & Baeyens, J. (2003) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00282-0 · Cited by 2,438
Hu, P., & Long, M. (2016) · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.07.024 · Cited by 2,184
Li, X. Y., & Yang, S. F. (2007) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.06.037 · Cited by 2,096
Glaze, W. H., Kang, J.-W., & Chapin, D. H. (1987) · Ozone: Science & Engineering · doi:10.1080/01919518708552148 · Cited by 1,963
Advanced Oxidation Processes (AOPs) in Wastewater Treatment
Deng, Y., & Zhao, R. (2015) · Current Pollution Reports · doi:10.1007/s40726-015-0015-z · Cited by 1,930
Chemistry of persulfates in water and wastewater treatment: A review
Wacławek, S., Lutze, H. V., Grübel, K., Padil, V. V. T., Černík, M., & Dionysiou, D. D. (2017) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2017.07.132 · Cited by 1,874
Anipsitakis, G. P., & Dionysiou, D. D. (2003) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es0263792 · Cited by 1,664
Cited by
Degradation of antibiotic pollutants by persulfate activated with various carbon materials
Gao, Y., Wang, Q., Ji, G., & Li, A. (2022) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2021.132387 · Cited by 455
Honarmandrad, Z., Sun, X., Wang, Z., Naushad, M., & Boczkaj, G. (2023) · Water Resources and Industry · doi:10.1016/j.wri.2022.100194 · Cited by 369
Narayanan, M., Ali, S. S., & El-Sheekh, M. (2023) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117532 · Cited by 221
Sonawane, S., Rayaroth, M. P., Landge, V. K., Fedorov, K., & Boczkaj, G. (2022) · Current Opinion in Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.coche.2022.100839 · Cited by 91
Ahmed, H. R., Hama Aziz, K. H., Agha, N. N. M., Mustafa, F. S., & Hinder, S. J. (2023) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/d3ra04566h · Cited by 62
Metadata
- Authors
- Ushani, U., Lu, X., Wang, J., Zhang, Z., Dai, J., Tan, Y., Wang, S., Li, W., Niu, C., Cai, T., Wang, N., & Zhen, G.
- Venue
- Chemical Engineering Journal
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-12
- Volume
- 402
- Pages
- 126232
- ISSN
- 1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3042404080
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 190
- FWCI
- 15.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sulfate radicals-based advanced oxidation technology in various environmental remediation: A state-of-the–art review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126232
- The paper
- Ushani, U., Lu, X., Wang, J., Zhang, Z., Dai, J., Tan, Y., Wang, S., Li, W., Niu, C., Cai, T., Wang, N., & Zhen, G. (2020). Sulfate radicals-based advanced oxidation technology in various environmental remediation: A state-of-the–art review. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126232
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
