Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 166

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hierarchical Ni3N/Ni0.2Mo0.8N heterostructure nanorods arrays as efficient electrocatalysts for overall water and urea electrolysis

Li, Rui-Qing, Wan, Xiao-Yu, Chen, Bao-Li, Cao, Ru-Yuan, Ji, Qing-Hong, Deng, Jie, Qu, Kong-Gang, Wang, Xue-Bin, Zhu, Ya-Chao·2021·Chemical Engineering Journal

Abstract

Abstract The energy-saving urea electrolysis integrating the HER and smart urea oxidation reaction (UOR) can supplant the kinetics-restricted oxygen evolution reaction (OER) for hydrogen generation, but is still severely thwarted by poor electrocatalysts. Herein, a tractable hydrothermal protocol coupled with subsequent nitridation is found to enable uniform growth of the Ni3N/Ni0.2Mo0.8N heterostructure microspheres assembled by the uniform nanorod arrays on the nickel foam framework (Ni3N/Ni0.2Mo0.8N/NF). The as-obtained Ni3N/Ni0.2Mo0.8N/NF catalyst exhibits multifunctional superior performance for both overall water and urea electrolysis. For HER, the low overpotentials of 55 and 65 mV can be only required to deliver 10 mA cm−2 in alkaline and neutral electrolytes, respectively. Furthermore, for UOR a ultrasmall potential of 1.328 V (vs. RHE) at 10 mA cm−2 occurs, which is much lower than that required for OER process. When applying the Ni3N/Ni0.2Mo0.8N/NF as anode for OER and cathode for HER, the water electrolyzer requires low cell voltages of 1.487 and 1.724 V to achieve 10 and 200 mA cm−2, respectively. More significantly, the urea electrolyser presents ultralow cell voltages of 1.348 and 1.514 V at 10 and 200 mA cm−2 and remarkable longevity for over 500 h. Such impressive performances exceed most reported noble-metal-free catalysts and even vie for the benchmarking noble metal catalysts, heralding its tremendous utilitarian prospects for the cost-effective and energy-saving hydrogen generation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cej.2020.128240

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 166

Metadata

Authors
Li, R.-Q., Wan, X.-Y., Chen, B.-L., Cao, R.-Y., Ji, Q.-H., Deng, J., Qu, K.-G., Wang, X.-B., & Zhu, Y.-C.
Venue
Chemical Engineering Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-04
Volume
409
Pages
128240
ISSN
1385-8947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3116575581
Cited by
166
References
3
FWCI
4.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hierarchical Ni3N/Ni0.2Mo0.8N heterostructure nanorods arrays as efficient electrocatalysts for overall water and urea electrolysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cej.2020.128240
The paper
Li, R.-Q., Wan, X.-Y., Chen, B.-L., Cao, R.-Y., Ji, Q.-H., Deng, J., Qu, K.-G., Wang, X.-B., & Zhu, Y.-C. (2021). Hierarchical Ni3N/Ni0.2Mo0.8N heterostructure nanorods arrays as efficient electrocatalysts for overall water and urea electrolysis. Chemical Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.128240

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.