Cited by 146CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringChromosomal and Genetic VariationsBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Architecture of the Mos1 Paired-End Complex: The Structural Basis of DNA Transposition in a Eukaryote

Open access

Abstract

A key step in cut-and-paste DNA transposition is the pairing of transposon ends before the element is excised and inserted at a new site in its host genome. Crystallographic analyses of the paired-end complex (PEC) formed from precleaved transposon ends and the transposase of the eukaryotic element Mos1 reveals two parallel ends bound to a dimeric enzyme. The complex has a trans arrangement, with each transposon end recognized by the DNA binding region of one transposase monomer and by the active site of the other monomer. Two additional DNA duplexes in the crystal indicate likely binding sites for flanking DNA. Biochemical data provide support for a model of the target capture complex and identify Arg186 to be critical for target binding. Mixing experiments indicate that a transposase dimer initiates first-strand cleavage and suggest a pathway for PEC formation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.012

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 39 references

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–146 of 146

Metadata

Authors
Richardson, J. M., Colloms, S. D., Finnegan, D. J., & Walkinshaw, M. D.
Affiliations
University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Richardson, Julia M.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-09
Volume
138
Issue
6
Pages
1096-1108
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026862785
Cited by
145
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (085176)
  • Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
DNA transposition, cut-and-paste transposition, crystal structure
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA Transposable Elements, DNA-Binding Proteins, Drosophila, Models, Molecular, X-Ray Diffraction, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Crystallography, X-Ray, Transposases, Catalytic Domain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review