RAG1 Core and V(D)J Recombination Signal Sequences Were Derived from Transib Transposons
Open accessAbstract
The V(D)J recombination reaction in jawed vertebrates is catalyzed by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins, which are believed to have emerged approximately 500 million years ago from transposon-encoded proteins. Yet no transposase sequence similar to RAG1 or RAG2 has been found. Here we show that the approximately 600-amino acid "core" region of RAG1 required for its catalytic activity is significantly similar to the transposase encoded by DNA transposons that belong to the Transib superfamily. This superfamily was discovered recently based on computational analysis of the fruit fly and African malaria mosquito genomes. Transib transposons also are present in the genomes of sea urchin, yellow fever mosquito, silkworm, dog hookworm, hydra, and soybean rust. We demonstrate that recombination signal sequences (RSSs) were derived from terminal inverted repeats of an ancient Transib transposon. Furthermore, the critical DDE catalytic triad of RAG1 is shared with the Transib transposase as part of conserved motifs. We also studied several divergent proteins encoded by the sea urchin and lancelet genomes that are 25%-30% identical to the RAG1 N-terminal domain and the RAG1 core. Our results provide the first direct evidence linking RAG1 and RSSs to a specific superfamily of DNA transposons and indicate that the V(D)J machinery evolved from transposons. We propose that only the RAG1 core was derived from the Transib transposase, whereas the N-terminal domain was assembled from separate proteins of unknown function that may still be active in sea urchin, lancelet, hydra, and starlet sea anemone. We also suggest that the RAG2 protein was not encoded by ancient Transib transposons but emerged in jawed vertebrates as a counterpart of RAG1 necessary for the V(D)J recombination reaction.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
The paper provides computational evidence that the ~600-amino-acid RAG1 core and V(D)J recombination signal sequences (RSSs) were derived from an ancient Transib DNA transposon. It proposes that only the RAG1 core came from the Transib transposase, while the RAG1 N-terminal domain and RAG2 were assembled or emerged separately.
Key findings
- The RAG1 core (human residues 387–1011) is significantly similar to Transib transposases; PSI-BLAST significance improved as more Transib TPases were added, with final Ei values of 10⁻⁹–10⁻⁴ and convergence E-values below 10⁻²⁰.
- RSSs resemble Transib terminal inverted repeats: the 38-bp Transib TIR consensus has a 5′-CACAATG heptamer, a 23-bp spacer, and an AAAAAAATC nonamer, closely matching RSS heptamer/nonamer structure; the chance match probability was estimated as P1 = 0.001.
- The RAG1 catalytic DDE triad residues 603, 711, and 965 are conserved in Transib TPases, with the second D-to-E distance being 206–214 aa in Transib and 253 aa in RAG1.
- RAG1/2-mediated transpositions frequently generate 5-bp target site duplications—35/38 (92%) intermolecular, 69% of 36 intramolecular, 6/6 in one study, and 60% of 26 in yeast—matching the 5-bp TSDs characteristic of Transib transposons.
- A hydra RAG1 core–like protein, RAG1L_NM, is 26% identical to Transib TPase (E ≈ 10⁻¹⁴), providing a direct link between RAG1 core and Transib TPase.
Methods
- Computational sequence analysis used BLASTP and step-wise PSI-BLAST against GenBank proteins combined with 7, 13, and 18 Transib TPases, with SEG/COILS filtering and composition-based statistics; multiple alignments used T-Coffee, phylogenies used MEGA3, and gene prediction used FGENESH.
- Data included assembled and trace genome sequences from Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila pseudoobscura, Anopheles gambiae, Aedes aegypti, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus, Branchiostoma floridae, Hydra magnipapillata, and Nematostella vectensis, plus Repbase and GenBank Trace Archive sequences.
- The probability that Transib TIRs match RSS conserved positions by chance was estimated as P1 = fC × fA × fC × fA × fA = 0.001.
Limitations
- The paper states that the low identity between Transib TPase and RAG1 core (14%–17%) leaves unclear whether the ancestral transposon was a canonical Transib or an unknown Transib group more similar to RAG1.
- It states that sea urchin, lancelet, hydra, and starlet sea anemone genomes are only partially assembled or available as unassembled WGS traces, so whether RAG1-like sequences are transposon remnants or genes/pseudogenes remains open.
- It states that no RAG2-like sequences were found in those invertebrate genomes and that RAG2 may have diversified beyond sequence detection; evident from the text, the Transib/RAG1 link is computational and lacks direct functional validation of Transib TPase activity or RSS binding.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 64 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
The approximately 600-amino acid core region of RAG1 required for its catalytic activity is significantly similar to the transposase encoded by DNA transposons of the Transib superfamily.
“Here we show that the approximately 600-amino acid “core” region of RAG1 required for its catalytic activity is significantly similar to the transposase encoded by DNA transposons that belong to the Transib superfamily.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Divergent proteins encoded by the sea urchin and lancelet genomes are 25%-30% identical to the RAG1 N-terminal domain and the RAG1 core.
“We also studied several divergent proteins encoded by the sea urchin and lancelet genomes that are 25%−30% identical to the RAG1 N-terminal domain and the RAG1 core.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The critical DDE catalytic triad of RAG1 is shared with the Transib transposase as part of conserved motifs.
“Furthermore, the critical DDE catalytic triad of RAG1 is shared with the Transib transposase as part of conserved motifs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No significant similarities between the nine other known superfamilies of DNA transposons and RAG1 protein were found.
“However, based on PSI-BLAST searches, no significant similarities between these nine TPases and RAG1 protein were found (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The approximately 60-aa C-terminal portion of the Transib2_AG TPase is 35%-38% identical to the C-terminal portion of the RAG1 core.
“we found that the approximately 60-aa C-terminal portion of the Transib2_AG TPase was 35%−38% identical to the C-terminal portion of the RAG1 core (Figure S1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
With 15 Transib TPases, Ei-values of matches between RAG1s and the new PSSM were approximately 10−6-10−3.
“Again, Ei-values of matches between RAG1s and the new PSSM derived from multiple alignment of 15 Transib TPases (the two GenBank proteins plus all our TPases) were much smaller (approximately 10−6–10−3; Table 1) than those obtained based on the PSSM constructed from the nine TPases at the preceding step (approximately 10−3–10−2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Recently sequenced genomes of honeybee, roundworms, fish, frog, mammals, sea squirts, plants, and fungi (except soybean rust) do not contain any detectable Transib transposons.
“At the same time, recently sequenced genomes of honeybee, roundworms, fish, frog, mammals, sea squirts, plants, and fungi (except soybean rust) do not contain any detectable Transib transposons (see Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Contig 6797 harbours two additional defective pseudogenes coding for different RAG1 core-like proteins.
“Interestingly, the 6,690-bp contig 6797 harbours two additional defective pseudogenes coding for different RAG1 core–like proteins (Figure 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Nearly the entire sequences of several Transib TPases, excluding their 100-140-aa N-terminal domains, converged with an approximately 600-aa portion of RAG1 defined by positions approximately 360-1010.
“Nearly the entire sequences of several Transib TPases, excluding their 100–140-aa N-terminal domains, converged with an approximately 600-aa portion of RAG1 defined by positions approximately 360–1010 (Figure S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
RAG1 proteins appeared more similar to the PSSM created by PSI-BLAST based on multiple alignment of the Transib2_AG TPase and two Transib TPase-like proteins than to the solo Transib2_AG TPase in BLASTP.
“The RAG1 proteins appeared to be more similar to the position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM) created by PSI-BLAST based on multiple alignment of the Transib2_AG TPase and two Transib TPase-like proteins, than to the solo Transib2_AG TPase in the BLASTP search.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The statistical significance of similarity between the Transib2_AG TPase and RAG1s was Ei = 0.025.
“The statistical significance of similarity between the TPase and RAG1s was measured by Ei = 0.025, where Ei is the E-value threshold for the first inclusion of RAG1 sequences into the PSI-BLAST iterations [18] (Materials and Methods).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [18] Altschul, 1997, Nucleic Acids Res source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingnone given
The C-terminal domain of RAG1 (residues 764-1011) is the portion of RAG1 most conserved between RAG1 and Transib TPases.
“The C-terminal domain of RAG1 (residues 764–1011) is the portion of RAG1 that is most conserved between RAG1 and Transib TPases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Some Transib families show high target site specificity, e.g., Transib-N1_AG and Transib-N2_AG integrate preferentially at cCASTGg and cCAWTGc, respectively.
“Moreover, some families show high target site specificity, e.g., Transib-N1_AG and Transib-N2_AG integrate preferentially at cCASTGg and cCAWTGc, respectively (TSDs are capitalized).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The distances between the second D and E residues are much longer in Transib transposons (206-214 aa) and RAG1 (253 aa) than in DDE TPases from other studied superfamilies.
“This includes the distances between the second D and E residues, which are much longer in Transib transposons (206–214 aa) and RAG1 (253 aa) than in DDE TPases from other studied superfamilies (e.g., approximately 35-aa in Mariner/Tc1 [23], 2-aa in P [23], approximately 35-aa in Harbinger [24], with hAT as an exception (325-aa, [25]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Findingown data
Diverse Transib TPases are present in silkworm, red flour beetle, dog hookworm, freshwater flatworm, soybean rust, and hydra.
“we also found diverse Transib TPases in silkworm, red flour beetle, dog hookworm, freshwater flatworm, soybean rust, and hydra (Table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Genomes of plants and vertebrates seem to be free of any recognizable Transib transposons.
“Genomes of plants and vertebrates seem to be free of any recognizable Transib transposons (Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
An intermediate RAG1-like sequence in Hydra magnipapillata, RAG1L_HM, is significantly similar to both RAG1 and Transib TPase.
“During the final revision of this manuscript, we identified an intermediate RAG1-like sequence in Hydra magnipapillata, called RAG1L_HM, which is significantly similar to both RAG1 and Transib TPase, as shown later.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The corresponding positions are perfectly conserved in all Transib transposons, excluding the 85% conserved position 34.
“The corresponding positions are perfectly conserved in all Transib transposons (Figure 4A and 4B; excluding the 85% conserved position 34 in the Transib consensus that corresponds to position 5 in the RSS nonamer).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Each catalytic residue of the DDE triad is part of a motif conserved in Transib TPases and RAG1 (motifs 4, 6, and 10).
“Moreover, each catalytic residue is a part of a motif that is conserved in the Transib TPases and RAG1 (motifs 4, 6, and 10 in Figures 3 and Figure S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In PSI-BLAST, two unclassified proteins and RAG1s constituted the only group of GenBank proteins similar to the Transib2_AG TPase.
“we found that two unclassified proteins (GenBank gi 30923617 and 30923765; annotated as hypothetical proteins) and RAG1s constituted the only group of any GenBank proteins similar to the Transib2_AG TPase (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The 38-bp consensus TIR of Transib transposons consists of a conserved 5′-CACAATG heptamer separated by a variable 23-bp spacer from an AAAAAAATC-3′ nonamer.
“The 38-bp consensus TIR of Transib transposons consists of a conserved 5′- CACAATG heptamer separated by a variable 23-bp spacer from an AAAAAAATC-3′ nonamer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Several other motifs conserved in Transib TPases and RAG1 include amino acid residues shown experimentally to be important for specific functions in V(D)J recombination.
“Several other motifs conserved in Transib TPases and RAG1 include aa residues that have been shown experimentally to be important for specific functions in V(D)J recombination (Figure S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
All three core residues from the catalytic DDE triad in RAG1 proteins (residues 603, 711, and 965) necessary for V(D)J recombination are conserved in Transib TPases.
“All three core residues from the catalytic DDE triad in the RAG1 proteins (residues 603, 711, and 965) that are necessary for V(D)J recombination [21,22] are conserved in the Transib TPases (Figures 3 and Figure S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
The probability of the observed match between the RSS and Transib termini to occur by chance is less than 10−3.
“The probability of the observed match between the RSS and Transib termini to occur by chance is less than 10−3 (see Materials and Methods).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using RAG1 proteins as queries against sea urchin contigs, eight proteins were identified that are approximately 30% identical to portions of the RAG1 core and approximately 50% identical to each other.
“we identified eight proteins approximately 30% identical to portions of the RAG1 core and approximately 50% identical to each other (see Figures 2, 5, and S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The similarity between Transib2_AG TPase and the RAG1 core in BLASTP was only marginally significant (E = 0.07).
“However, this similarity was only marginally significant (E = 0.07 where the E-value is an expected number of sequences matching by chance; Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Combining seven known Transib TPases with GenBank noticeably dropped Ei-values for matches of RAG1s to a new PSSM based on alignment of nine Transib TPases.
“As a result, Ei-values for matches of RAG1s to a new PSSM based on alignment of nine Transib TPases (the two GenBank TPase-like proteins plus seven added TPases) noticeably dropped in comparison with the Ei-values obtained for the PSSM constructed in the previous step based on alignment of the three TPases (Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
With all 18 TPases, Ei values of matches between RAG1s and the Transib PSSM dropped to 10−9-10−4.
“When all 18 TPases were combined with the original GenBank set, the Ei values of matches between RAG1s and the Transib PSSM dropped significantly further (10−9–10−4; Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A 597-aa protein sequence encoded by a single open reading frame (contig 29068) is 28% identical to nearly the entire RAG1 core (positions 461-1002 in human RAG1).
“We also identified a 597-aa protein sequence encoded by a single open reading frame (contig 29068, positions 1157–2944), which is 28% identical to nearly the entire RAG1 core (positions 461–1002 in the human RAG1, Figure S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The starlet sea anemone and hydra genomes encode several families of the N-terminal RAG1 domain that appear to be separate from the RAG1 core-like proteins.
“Based on the same approach, our study found that the starlet sea anemone and hydra genomes also encode several families of the N-terminal RAG1 domain that appear to be separate from the RAG1 core–like proteins (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The hydra RAG1L_NM protein is significantly similar to the Transib TPase (26% identity; E-value approximately 10−14).
“Remarkably, the hydra RAG1L_NM protein turned out to be significantly similar to the Transib TPase (26% identity; E-value is approximately equal to 10−14 in a BLASTX search against GenBank proteins combined with the Transib TPase sequences).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A third sea urchin protein on contig 768 contains unique motifs in its N-terminal regions that best match homologous regions of RAG1.
“We also found a third protein on contig 768 that contains unique motifs in its N-terminal regions that best match the homologous regions of RAG1.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There is no significant sequence identity between hAT TPases and RAG1, even if one employs a PSI-BLAST search with most relaxed parameters.
“First, as we mentioned previously, there is no significant sequence identity between hAT TPases and RAG1, even if one employs a PSI-BLAST search with most relaxed parameters (i.e., E < 10, no filters, no composition-based statistics).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
None of the sea urchin and lancelet proteins align to the approximately 100-aa N-terminus of RAG1.
“None of the sea urchin and lancelet proteins align to the approximately 100-aa N-terminus of RAG1, which may indicate that this portion is missing from the genome or highly diverged and difficult to detect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The new conserved motifs are H-x3-L-x3-C-R-x-C-G and D-x3-I-h-P-x2-F-C-x2-C.
“The new conserved motifs are H-x3-L-x3-C-R-x-C-G and D-x3-I-h-P-x2-F-C-x2-C, and their function remains to be determined.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
BLASTP searches of the sea urchin sequences against all GenBank proteins, excluding RAG1, detected only the ring finger domain of the sea urchin sequences.
“BLASTP searches of the sea urchin sequences against all GenBank proteins, excluding RAG1, detected only the ring finger domain of the sea urchin sequences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Even without the ring finger motif, the remaining portions of the sea urchin sequences are significantly similar to the corresponding portions of RAG1.
“Even without the finger, the remaining portions of the sea urchin sequences were significantly similar to the corresponding portions of RAG1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The only exception was the sea anemone RAG1 core-like sequence, whose approximately 90-aa N-terminus is the ring finger.
“The only exception was the already mentioned sea anemone RAG1 core–like sequence. The approximately 90-aa N-terminus of the latter sequence is the ring finger (E < 10−7, multiple BLASTP matches against known ring fingers in GenBank).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Unlike highly conserved RAG1 proteins, the RAG1 core-like proteins are remarkably diverse.
“However, unlike highly conserved RAG1 proteins, the RAG1 core–like proteins are remarkably diverse (see Figure 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
N-terminal RAG1 and RAG1-like proteins share an additional conserved motif W-x-p-h-x(3-6)-C-x2-C that resides between conserved motif 2 and the ring finger.
“It also likely that the N-terminal RAG1 and RAG1-like proteins share an additional conserved motif W-x-p-h-x(3–6)-C-x2-C that resides between conserved motif 2 and the ring finger (Figure 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The RAG1 core-like protein in WGS contig 12509 seems to be encoded by the last exon starting at position 1650 of a hypothetical RAG1-like gene.
“The RAG1 core–like protein in whole genome shotgun (WGS) contig 12509 (Figure 5) also seems to be encoded by the last exon starting at position 1650 of a hypothetical RAG1-like gene.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We could not find any RAG2-like sequences in the recently sequenced sea urchin, lancelet, hydra, and sea anemone genomes, which encode RAG1-like sequences.
“Also, we could not find any RAG2-like sequences in the recently sequenced sea urchin, lancelet, hydra, and sea anemone genomes, which encode RAG1-like sequences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The lancelet RAG1 core-like elements show no hallmarks of transposons.
“Again, as in the case of the sea urchin sequences, the lancelet RAG1 core–like elements show no hallmarks of transposons (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The acceptor splice site positions in the sea urchin RAG1 core-like proteins closely correspond to those in RAG1 from teleosts, in which RAG1 is split by an intron at position homologous to Gly460 in human RAG1.
“Remarkably, the acceptor splice site positions in the sea urchin RAG1 core–like proteins closely correspond to those in RAG1 from teleosts (i.e., most of the living ray-finned or bony fish), in which RAG1 is split by an intron at position homologous to Gly460 in human RAG1 [34].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] Willett, 1997, Immunogenetics source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
The RAG1 core shows 79% identity between sharks and mammals.
“as indicated by the observed conservation of the RAG1 core (79% identity between sharks and mammals).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Detailed analysis of regions flanking the sea urchin RAG1-like DNA coding sequences revealed a variety of different transposable elements inserted in the proximity of the coding sequences.
“Detailed analysis of regions flanking the sea urchin RAG1-like DNA coding sequences revealed a variety of different transposable elements inserted in the proximity of the coding sequences (see Figure 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Separate analysis of assembled sea urchin sequences yielded seven sequences encoding three diverse proteins significantly similar to the 380-aa N-terminal domain of RAG1 (BLASTX, E < 10−4), excluding the 100-aa N-terminus.
“A separate analysis of the assembled sea urchin sequences yielded seven sequences encoding three diverse proteins that were significantly similar to the 380-aa N-terminal domain of RAG1 (BLASTX, E < 10−4), excluding the 100-aa N-terminus (Figure 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Only two cysteines of the zinc finger B (ZFB) C2H2 motif in RAG1 (residues 695-761) involved in its binding to RAG2 are perfectly conserved in the Transib TPases (motif 7).
“Interestingly, only two cysteines of the zinc finger B (ZFB) C2H2 motif in RAG1 (residues 695–761) involved in its binding to RAG2 [30,31] are perfectly conserved in the Transib TPases (motif 7; see Figures 3 and Figure S3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Findingown data
Hydra magnipapillata WGS trace sequences code for protein sequences 26%-30% identical to the RAG1 core.
“We also found several approximately 1000-bp WGS trace sequences of Hydra magnipapillata (Trace Archive IDs 688654311, 647073738, 666995387, 687186526, 688683890, and 688948453), coding for protein sequences 26%−30% identical to the RAG1 core (positions 753−995, E-value is approximately equal to 10−7 in a BLASTX search against GenBank).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The ring finger motif is present in several sea urchin proteins unrelated to RAG1 but significantly similar to diverse proteins associated with immune and developmental systems as well as regulation of transcription.
“The ring finger motif itself is also present in several sea urchin proteins unrelated to RAG1 but significantly similar to diverse proteins associated with immune and developmental systems as well as regulation of transcription.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
We could not identify the 5-bp TSDs and TIRs characteristic of the Transib superfamily in the sea urchin RAG1-like sequences.
“We also could not identify the 5-bp TSDs and TIRs characteristic of the Transib superfamily.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In starlet sea anemone, RAG1L_NV is approximately 30% identical to the human RAG1 core (positions 284-802).
“In starlet sea anemone, several approximately 1000-bp WGS trace sequences were found (e.g., GenBank Trace Archive IDs 668021618, 558173651, 568641192, and 599572062), which encode protein, called RAG1L_NV, that is approximately 30% identical to the human RAG1 core (positions 284–802, TBLASTN, 10−26 < E < 10−7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
None of the Transib transposons identified so far encode any proteins other than the Transib/RAG TPase.
“However, none of the Transib transposons identified so far encode any proteins other than the Transib/RAG TPase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Based on the orientations and relative positions of these transposons, none of them appears to be associated with the RAG1-like sequences.
“Nevertheless, based on the orientations and relative positions of these transposons, none of them appears to be associated with the RAG1-like sequences (see Figure 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
The RAG1 core-like ORF in contig 29068 forms a terminal exon of an incomplete hypothetical gene composed of two exons.
“Using FGENESH [33], we detected that the RAG1 core–like open reading frame (ORF) in the contig 29068 forms a terminal exon (positions 1154–2947) of an incomplete hypothetical gene composed of two exons (internal and terminal; see Figure S6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] Solovyev, 2002, Current Topics in Computational Biology: MIT Press
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
In the sea urchin, lancelet, hydra, and starlet sea anemone genomes, the RAG1 core-like sequences and the N-terminal domain-like sequences do not appear to be linked to each other or to any other proteins.
“In the sea urchin, lancelet, hydra, and starlet sea anemone genomes, the RAG1 core–like sequences and the N-terminal domain–like sequences do not appear to be linked to each other or to any other proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The sea urchin, lancelet, hydra, and starlet sea anemone genomes harbor several highly divergent N-terminal-like domains, separate from the RAG1 core-like sequences and known transposable elements.
“Furthermore, given that the sea urchin, lancelet, hydra, and starlet sea anemone genomes harbor several highly divergent N-terminal–like domains, separate from the RAG1 core–like sequences and known transposable elements, it is very likely that the N-terminal–like domains of RAG1 also form a multigene family that can be traced back to a common ancestor of Deuterostomes (see Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The lancelet genome encodes five different proteins similar to the N-terminal domain of RAG1 (BLASTP E values 10−14-10−7).
“By analyzing the lancelet WGS traces, we also found that the lancelet genome encodes five different proteins similar to the N-terminal domain of RAG1 (BLASTP E values in searches against all GenBank proteins were in a range of 10−14–10−7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The 3′ terminal portion of the internal exon encodes a protein sequence marginally similar to an approximately 50-aa fragment of the RAG1 core (positions 394-454 in human RAG1).
“The 3′ terminal portion of the internal exon encodes a protein sequence that appears to be marginally similar to an approximately 50-aa fragment of the RAG1 core (positions 394–454 in human RAG1; Figure S5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The 102-aa N-terminal subdomain, corresponding to the first exon in genes split by two introns, appears to be missing in the sea urchin, lancelet, hydra, and starlet sea anemone N-terminal-like proteins.
“As indicated above, this subdomain, corresponding to the first exon in the genes split by two introns, appears to be missing in the sea urchin, lancelet, hydra, and starlet sea anemone N-terminal–like proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TIRs of hAT transposons are different from RSS both in terms of DNA sequence similarities and their conservation patterns.
“Third, unlike in the case of Transib transposons, TIRs of hAT transposons are different from RSS both in terms of DNA sequence similarities and their conservation patterns (Figure S7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The probability P1 that the 5′ terminus of a transposon from a particular Transib family would match by chance an RSS at its most conserved positions is 0.001.
“The value of P1 is 0.001, indicating a significant similarity between Transib TIRs and RSS.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The lancelet genome encodes protein sequences approximately 35% identical to the RAG1 core (RAG1L_BF; BLASTP E-value = 10−34).
“we found that the lancelet genome encodes protein sequences approximately 35% identical to the RAG1 core (Figure S5; RAG1L_BF; BLASTP E-value is equal to 10−34).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Unassembled WGS trace sequences encode two other sea urchin proteins, P4_SP and P5_SP, similar to the N-terminal RAG1 domain.
“Furthermore, we found that unassembled WGS trace sequences encode two other proteins, P4_SP and P5_SP, similar to the N-terminal RAG1 domain (Figure 6).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The core-like sequences encoded by the sea urchin WGS sequence contigs 29068 and 12509 correspond to either the second or third RAG1 exon in teleosts.
“The core-like sequences encoded by the sea urchin WGS sequence contigs 29068 and 12509 correspond to either the second or third RAG1 exon in teleosts (depending on the number of introns), which is remarkably consistent with the fusion model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
The only notable exception is the anemone RAG1 core-like protein sequence, which is capped by the 90-aa ring finger motif.
“The only notable exception is the anemone RAG1 core–like protein sequence, which is capped by the 90-aa ring finger motif.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Recombination signal sequences (RSSs) were derived from terminal inverted repeats of an ancient Transib transposon.
“We demonstrate that recombination signal sequences (RSSs) were derived from terminal inverted repeats of an ancient Transib transposon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The structure and conservation patterns of the 38-bp termini of Transib transposons from 21 different families closely resemble those of RSSs, suggesting that RSSs were derived from termini of ancient Transib transposons.
“The structure and conservation patterns of the 38-bp termini of Transib transposons from 21 different families closely resemble those of RSSs, suggesting that the latter were derived from termini of ancient Transib transposons (Figures 4 and S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Based on the conserved motifs, the function of these motifs in Transib TPases is expected to be similar to that in RAG1.
“Based on this information, the function of these motifs in Transib TPases is expected to be similar to that in RAG1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The structure of Transib TIRs corresponds closely to the structure of RSSs, which are composed of conserved heptamers 5′-CACAGTG separated by variable 22-bp spacers from ACAAAAACC-like nonamers.
“This corresponds closely to the structure of RSSs, which are composed of the conserved heptamers 5′- CACAGTG separated by a variable 22-bp spacers from ACAAAAACC-like nonamers [1,5–7].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked - Premisecitation
Transib transposons belong to the only superfamily of eukaryotic DNA transposons with 5-bp TSDs generated upon insertions into the genome.
“Given the predominance of 5-bp TSDs, it is striking that Transib transposons belong to the only superfamily of eukaryotic DNA transposons with 5-bp TSDs generated upon insertions into the genome [17,24].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
Given that the only significant similarity of the RAG1 core was to the Transib TPase, the RAG1 core was re-confirmed as belonging to the Transib superfamily.
“Therefore, given that the only significant similarity of the RAG1 core was to the Transib TPase, the RAG1 core was re-confirmed as belonging to the Transib superfamily.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
RAG1-mediated transposition in vitro, both intermolecular and intramolecular, is most frequently accompanied by 5-bp TSDs.
“It has been known that RAG1-mediated transposition in vitro, both intermolecular and intramolecular, is most frequently accompanied by 5-bp TSDs [12,13].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
The C-terminal domain of RAG1 is predicted to function analogously in Transib transposons.
“This domain is predicted to function analogously in Transib transposons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The 12/23 rule can be derived directly from the sequence structure of known Transib transposons.
“Therefore, even the 12/23 rule [1] can be derived directly from the sequence structure of known Transib transposons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Tonegawa, 1983, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The results provide the first direct evidence linking RAG1 and RSSs to a specific superfamily of DNA transposons.
“Our results provide the first direct evidence linking RAG1 and RSSs to a specific superfamily of DNA transposons and indicate that the V(D)J machinery evolved from transposons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The V(D)J machinery evolved from transposons.
“Our results provide the first direct evidence linking RAG1 and RSSs to a specific superfamily of DNA transposons and indicate that the V(D)J machinery evolved from transposons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
RAG1/2-mediated transpositions also show significant target specificity, presumably reflecting the original specificity of the Transib TPase.
“RAG1/2-mediated transpositions also show significant target specificity, presumably reflecting the original specificity of the Transib TPase [12].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Agrawal, 1998, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The observed sequence similarity between the RAG1 and Transib TPase protein can help to identify amino acid residues in the TPase that are crucial for transposition of Transib transposons.
“The observed sequence similarity between the RAG1 and Transib TPase protein can help to identify aa residues in the TPase that are crucial for transposition of Transib transposons.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The remaining portion of the ZFB motif was probably lost in TPases of insect Transib transposons, which do not encode RAG2-like proteins.
“The remaining portion of the ZFB motif was probably lost in TPases of insect Transib transposons, which do not encode RAG2-like proteins.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Most likely, Transib transpositions are also characterized by hairpin intermediates formed by the ends of the donor DNA double-strand breaks, as observed during V(D)J recombination and hAT transposition.
“Most likely, the Transib transpositions are also characterized by hairpin intermediates formed by the ends of the donor DNA double-strand breaks, as observed during V(D)J recombination and hAT transposition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Taken together with the fact that only the RAG1 core is significantly similar to Transib TPase, the data suggest that the vertebrate RAG1 represents a fusion of once separate proteins.
“Taken together with the fact that only the RAG1 core is significantly similar to Transib TPase, the data suggest that the vertebrate RAG1 represents a fusion of once separate proteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The N-terminal domain of RAG1 is functionally distinct from the core domain.
- Interpretationown data
The hydra RAG1 core-like protein provides the first direct link between the RAG1 core and Transib TPase.
“Therefore, the hydra RAG1 core–like protein provides the first direct link between the RAG1 core and Transib TPase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
After its recruitment, the RAG1 core most likely went through a period of intensive transformations due to diversifying/positive selection, which further decreased its similarity to Transib TPase.
“Furthermore, after its recruitment, the RAG1 core most likely went through a period of intensive transformations due to diversifying/positive selection, which further decreased its similarity to Transib TPase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
All four arguments strongly favor evolution of the V(D)J machinery from a Transib transposon.
“All four arguments strongly favor evolution of V(D)J machinery from a Transib transposon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: RAG1/2-mediated transpositions are characterized by 5-bp (sometimes 4-bp) TSDs, whereas all known hAT transposons are characterized by 8-bp TSDs.
- Premisecitation
The RAG1 core is split into separate exons at the amino acid position corresponding to position 460 in the human RAG1 gene.
“As a result, the RAG1 core is split into separate exons at the aa position that corresponds to position 460 in the human RAG1gene [29,34,38].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Study design and conductown data
Significant convergence of RAG1 and Transib TPases was observed to be independent of the particular type of substitution matrix (both BLOSUM62 and PAM70).
“Significant convergence of RAG1 and Transib TPases was observed to be independent of the particular type of substitution matrix (the same result was observed for both BLOSUM62 and PAM70 matrixes).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The origin of the V(D)J recombination system in jawless vertebrates appears to be a culmination of earlier evolutionary processes rather than an isolated event associated with insertion of a single transposon.
“In any case, the origin of the V(D)J recombination system in jawless vertebrates appears to be a culmination of earlier evolutionary processes rather than an isolated event associated with insertion of a single transposon.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The significant similarity between Transib TPases and RAG1 core, the common structure of Transib TIRs and RSSs, and the similar size of TSDs characterizing Transib transpositions and RAG1/RAG2-catalyzed transpositions directly support the hypothesis of a transposon-related origin of the V(D)J machinery.
“The significant similarity between the Transib TPases and RAG1 core, the common structure of the Transib TIRs and RSSs, as well as the similar size of TSDs characterizing transpositions of Transib transposons and transpositions catalyzed by RAG1 and RAG2, directly support the 25-year-old hypothesis of a transposon-related origin of the V(D)J machinery.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The correspondence of sea urchin core-like sequences to teleost RAG1 exons is remarkably consistent with the fusion model.
“The core-like sequences encoded by the sea urchin WGS sequence contigs 29068 and 12509 correspond to either the second or third RAG1 exon in teleosts (depending on the number of introns), which is remarkably consistent with the fusion model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The presence of serine in this motif is expected to be crucial to Transib transpositions.
“Therefore, the presence of serine in this motif is expected to be crucial to Transib transpositions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The apparent lack of RAG2-like proteins in the sequenced portion of the sea urchin, lancelet, hydra, and sea anemone genomes, as well as in Transib transposons, suggests that RAG2 was introduced in a separate event in jawless vertebrates.
“Nevertheless, the apparent lack of RAG2-like proteins in the sequenced portion of the sea urchin, lancelet, hydra, and sea anemone genomes, as well as in Transib transposons suggests that RAG2 was introduced in a separate event in jawless vertebrates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The absence of detectable RAG2-like sequences in the sequenced portions of the sea urchin, lancelet, hydra, and sea anemone genomes indicates that RAG2 was not present in these genomes.
- Premisecitation
In teleosts, the RAG1 gene is divided into exons by either one or two introns.
“This is consistent with the observation that in teleosts, (bony fish) the RAG1 gene is divided into exons by either one or two introns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
It is very likely that the N-terminal-like domains of RAG1 form a multigene family that can be traced back to a common ancestor of Deuterostomes.
“Furthermore, given that the sea urchin, lancelet, hydra, and starlet sea anemone genomes harbor several highly divergent N-terminal–like domains, separate from the RAG1 core–like sequences and known transposable elements, it is very likely that the N-terminal–like domains of RAG1 also form a multigene family that can be traced back to a common ancestor of Deuterostomes (see Figure 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 26
- May combine two claims. 25
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenTransib transposons are present in the genomes of sea urchin, yellow fever mosquito, silkworm, dog hookworm, hydra, and soybean rust.
“Transib transposons also are present in the genomes of sea urchin, yellow fever mosquito, silkworm, dog hookworm, hydra, and soybean rust.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationBoth RAG1/2-mediated and Transib transpositions show strong preference for GC-rich target sites, even though genomes hosting Transib transposons are AT-rich.
“Both RAG1/2-mediated and Transib transpositions show strong preference for GC-rich target sites [12–14,32], even though genomes hosting Transib transposons are AT-rich (Figure S4; Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTransib1_SP is a well-preserved 4132-bp element flanked by a 5-bp CGGCG TSD and encodes a 676-aa TPase (two exons) most similar to Transib2 TPase (34% identity).
“A well-preserved 4132-bp Transib1_SP element (contig 7839, positions 376–4506) is flanked by a 5-bp CGGCG TSD, and it encodes a 676-aa TPase (two exons) that is most similar to the Transib2 TPase (34% identity).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost Transib families are represented by transposons flanked by TIRs similar to RSS23, and several families include transposons with 5′ and 3′ termini similar to RSS12 and RSS23, respectively.
“Although most Transib families are represented by transposons flanked by TIRs similar to RSS23 (Figure 4A), several families include transposons with 5′ and 3′ termini similar to RSS12 and RSS23, respectively (Figure 4C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataTransib1_SP is the first Transib transposon identified outside of insect genomes.
“Transib1_SP is the first Transib transposon identified outside of insect genomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataExtensive analysis of the flanks failed to show any hallmarks of putative transposons associated with this RAG1-like protein, and no evidence was found that other RAG1 core-like proteins are encoded by transposable elements.
“Extensive analysis of the flanks failed to show any hallmarks of putative transposons that might be associated with this RAG1-like protein, and we did not find any evidence indicating that other RAG1 core–like proteins are encoded by transposable elements (Figure 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe two hypothetical GenBank proteins are apparent remnants of Transib TPases, with approximately 40% identity to the Transib2_AG TPase and E < 10−10 in BLASTP.
“both 151-aa and 123-aa hypothetical GenBank proteins were apparent remnants of Transib TPases (approximately 40% identity to the Transib2_AG TPase, E < 10−10 in BLASTP).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOnly one of the sea urchin RAG1 core-like proteins is present in two copies, which are 94% identical at the DNA level; both copies appear to be pseudogenes damaged by a stop codon at the same position.
“Only one protein is present in two copies, which are 94% identical to each other at the DNA level (contigs 81987 and 6797). Both copies appear to be encoded by pseudogenes damaged by a stop codon at the same position of each protein.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe RAG1 core-like protein in the sea urchin genome is shorter in its N-terminal part than the core domain in vertebrates and the corresponding Transib TPase.
“Similarly, the RAG1 core–like protein in the sea urchin genome is shorter in its N-terminal part than the core domain in vertebrates and the corresponding Transib TPase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBLASTP E-values for the sea urchin sequences P5_SP, P4_SP, and 768_SP against RAG1 were 9×10−9, 7×10−5, and 10−3, respectively, and were estimated conservatively because low-complexity filter and composition-based statistics were applied.
“BLASTP E-values were 9×10−9, 7×10−5, and 10−3 for the P5_SP, P4_SP, and 768_SP sequences, respectively; because both the low-complexity filter and composition-based statistics were applied, the corresponding E-values were estimated very conservatively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOn the basis of the TPase comparison to RAG1, we were able to identify correct positions of the last two amino acid residues in the DDE catalytic triad, missed in our previous study due to insufficient data.
“For instance, on the basis of the TPase comparison to RAG1 (see Figures S1 and S3), we were able to identify correct positions of the last two aa residues in the DDE catalytic triad (see Figure 2 in [17]), missed in our previous study due to insufficient data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Kapitonov, 2003, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe two sea urchin RAG1 core-like proteins are only 38% identical to each other but share common features: N-terminal portions are missing and RAG1-like sequences start at positions 17 or 18; the first aa residue overlaps with the acceptor splice site; and their similarity to RAG1 starts at positions corresponding to position 470 of human RAG1.
“Although the two proteins are only 38% identical to each other, they share common features: (1) their N-terminal portions are missing and the RAG1-like sequences start at positions 17 or 18; (2) in both proteins the first aa residue overlaps with the acceptor splice site; and (3) their similarity to RAG1 starts at positions corresponding to position 470 of the human RAG1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe first 305-aa sea urchin protein is encoded by contig 1226, and its recently duplicated copies are on contigs 1219 and 1222 (approximately 95% identical at protein level).
“The first 305-aa protein is encoded by contig 1226, and its recently duplicated copies are on contigs 1219 and 1222 (approximately 95% identical to each other at the protein level.)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSea urchin and lancelet proteins share a ring finger motif and two novel motifs matching the N-terminal RAG1 domain and remotely resembling C-x2-C zinc finger motifs.
“The proteins detected in the sea urchin and lancelet genome share a ring finger motif as well as two novel motifs matching the N-terminal RAG1 domain (Figure 6) and remotely resembling C-x2-C zinc finger motifs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataSo far, we have found no evidence of such similarities (flanking regions similar to nonautonomous elements).
“So far, we have found no evidence of such similarities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe second 195-aa sea urchin protein (contig 83099) is the shortest, only approximately 26% identical to the first protein and more than 90% identical at DNA level to its duplicate on contig 86231.
“The second, 195-aa protein (contig 83099) is the shortest. It is only approximately 26% identical to the first protein and more than 90% identical at the DNA level to its duplicate on contig 86231.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationV(D)J recombination in jawed vertebrates is catalyzed by the RAG1 and RAG2 proteins.
“In V(D)J recombination, DNA cleavage is catalyzed by two proteins encoded by the recombination-activating genes, approximately 1040-amino acid (aa) RAG1 and approximately 530-aa RAG2 [2,3].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe site specificity of V(D)J recombination is defined by binding of RAG1/2 to RSSs flanking the V, D, and J segments.
“The site specificity of the recombination is defined by the binding of RAG1/2 to RSSs flanking the V, D, and J segments [4].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Sakano, 1979, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAll RSSs consist of conserved heptamer and nonamer sequences separated by a variable spacer of either 12 ± 1 bp (RSS12) or 23 ± 1 bp (RSS23).
“All RSSs can be divided into two groups, referred to as RSS12 and RSS23, and consist of conserved heptamer and nonamer sequences separated by a variable spacer either 12 ± 1 (RSS12) or 23 ± 1 (RSS23) bp long [4–7].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationRAG1/2 catalyzed transpositions of a DNA segment flanked by RSS12 and RSS23 in vitro and in vivo in yeast.
“Finally, it was demonstrated that RAG1/2 catalyzed transpositions of a DNA segment flanked by RSS12 and RSS23 in vitro [12,13] and in vivo in yeast [14].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe RAG transposon model remained unproven because of the lack of significant structural similarities between RAGs and known TPases.
“However, given the lack of significant structural similarities between RAGs and known TPases, the “RAG transposon” model [9,12,13,16] remained unproven.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationEfficient V(D)J recombination requires recombination between RSS12 and RSS23, known as the 12/23 rule.
“A rule requiring that efficient V(D)J recombination occur between RSS12 and RSS23 is known as the “12/23” rule [1].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Tonegawa, 1983, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe RAG1 core (residues 387-1011) along with RAG2 is sufficient to perform V(D)J cleavage even after deletions of the 383-aa N-terminal and 32-aa C-terminal portions of RAG1.
“This portion of RAG1 corresponds to the “RAG1 core,” hereafter numbered relative to human RAG1 (residues 387–1011), which along with RAG2 is known to be sufficient to perform V(D)J cleavage even after deletions of the 383-aa N-terminal and 32-aa C-terminal portions of RAG1 [19,20].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe RAG1 Ei values decreased as the number of Transib TPases used for PSSM construction increased because RAG1 evolved from a Transib TPase.
“The RAG1 Ei values decreased as the number of Transib TPases used for the PSSM construction increased due to the fact that RAG1 evolved from a Transib TPase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTransib transposons are flanked by 5-bp target site duplications (TSDs), which distinguishes the superfamily from all others.
“Computational analysis of Transib elements, including their numerous insertions into copies of other transposons, demonstrated that Transib transposons are flanked by 5-bp target site duplications (TSDs), which also distinguishes this superfamily from all the others [17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Kapitonov, 2003, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe two terminal motifs of RAG1 NBR are conserved in Transib TPases, indicating they may be important for binding to Transib TIRs during transposition.
“The two terminal motifs of RAG1 NBR are conserved in the Transib TPases (Figure S3), which indicates that they may be important for their binding to the Transib TIRs during transposition (the RSS-like structure of TIRs is described below; Figure 4).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThe RAG2 protein was not encoded by ancient Transib transposons but emerged in jawed vertebrates as a counterpart of RAG1 necessary for the V(D)J recombination reaction.
“We also suggest that the RAG2 protein was not encoded by ancient Transib transposons but emerged in jawed vertebrates as a counterpart of RAG1 necessary for the V(D)J recombination reaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOnly the RAG1 core was derived from the Transib transposase, whereas the N-terminal domain was assembled from separate proteins of unknown function that may still be active in sea urchin, lancelet, hydra, and starlet sea anemone.
“We propose that only the RAG1 core was derived from the Transib transposase, whereas the N-terminal domain was assembled from separate proteins of unknown function that may still be active in sea urchin, lancelet, hydra, and starlet sea anemone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe observed patchy distribution of Transib transposons could be caused by horizontal transfers and extinctions in eukaryotic species.
“The observed patchy distribution could be caused by horizontal transfers and extinctions of Transib transposons in eukaryotic species.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMotif 5 function is not known yet but is expected to play a role both in V(D)J recombination and Transib transposition.
“Among the most conserved motifs, motif 5 (see Figures 3 and Figure S3) is of particular interest because its function is not known yet but is expected to play a role both V(D)J recombination and Transib transposition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationOnly bases at positions 1 through 3 in the heptamer and at positions 5 and 6 in the nonamer are universally conserved in RSSs and absolutely essential for efficient V(D)J recombination.
“Only bases at positions 1 through 3 in the heptamer and at positions 5 and 6 in the nonamer are universally conserved in RSSs and absolutely essential for efficient V(D)J recombination [5–7].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTransib transpositions are expected to be catalyzed by binding of the TPase to TIRs of autonomous and nonautonomous transposons.
“Transib transpositions are expected to be catalyzed by the binding of the TPase to TIRs of autonomous and nonautonomous transposons [17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Kapitonov, 2003, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningEven if only 30% of the sea urchin genome has been sequenced, it is expected that the regions flanking the TPase portions of potential autonomous elements should be similar to numerous nonautonomous elements.
“Therefore, even if only 30% of the sea urchin genome has been sequenced to date, it is expected that the regions flanking the TPase portions of potential autonomous elements should be similar to numerous nonautonomous elements.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Typically, TPase-coding autonomous DNA transposons are present in only a few complete copies per genome, while sequences homologous to their terminal portions, including specific TIRs, are usually abundant due to proliferation of nonautonomous DNA transposons.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningTo avoid detection of false similarities caused by simple repeats and coiled coils, the PSI-BLAST search was performed using stringent conditions with SEG and COILS filters masking low-complexity regions and coiled coils, and composition-based statistics were employed.
“To avoid detection of false similarities caused by simple repeats and coiled coils, the PSI-BLAST search was performed using stringent conditions with the SEG [47] and COILS [48] filters masking all low-complexity regions and coiled coils, respectively; composition-based statistics [45] were also employed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo ZFB cysteines are part of the conserved SxxCxxC motif, and mutations of the serine from the same motif cause severe defects in RAG1 transpositions in vitro.
“Notably, two ZFB cysteines are part of the conserved SxxCxxC motif, and mutations of the serine from the same motif cause severe defects in RAG1 transpositions in vitro [32].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Tsai, 2002, Genes Dev source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAfterwards, the RAG1 genes continued to evolve at a slow and steady pace under stabilizing selection, as indicated by the observed conservation of the RAG1 core (79% identity between sharks and mammals).
“Afterwards, the RAG1 genes continued to evolve at a slow and steady pace under stabilizing selection, as indicated by the observed conservation of the RAG1 core (79% identity between sharks and mammals).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataSome of the sea urchin sequences encoding the RAG1 N-terminal domain were assembled from traces based on the Baylor BAC-Fisher server, and the results of assembly were verified manually.
“Some of the sea urchin sequences encoding the RAG1 N-terminal domain were assembled from traces based on the Baylor BAC-Fisher server at http://www.hgsc.bcm.tmc.edu/BAC-Fisher / (the results of assembly were verified manually).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningGiven that only one third of the sea urchin genome is currently assembled as contigs longer than several thousand nucleotides, we cannot rule out the possibility that the sea urchin RAG1-like proteins are remnants of an unknown branch of Transib transposons.
“Still, given that only one third of the sea urchin genome is currently assembled as a set of contigs longer than several thousand nucleotides (the remaining portion is represented by short WGS sequences), we cannot rule out the possibility that the sea urchin RAG1-like proteins are remnants of an unknown branch of Transib transposons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The 5-bp TSDs and TIRs characteristic of the Transib superfamily are reliable markers of Transib origin.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningTo ensure that a conservation profile for the Transib TPases and RAG1 proteins was not produced by a systematic error, we employed a procedure of step-wise PSI-BLAST iterations.
“To ensure that a conservation profile for the Transib TPases and RAG1 proteins was not produced by a systematic error, we employed a procedure of “step-wise” PSI-BLAST iterations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningGiven that the five positions conserved in RSS are conserved in all TIRs from 21 families of Transib transposons, and the average identity between these 38-bp TIRs is only 49%, the chance of randomly matching these positions in TIRs from all 21 families is extremely small.
“Indeed, given that these five positions conserved in RSS are conserved in all TIRs from 21 families of Transib transposons, and the average identity between these 38-bp TIRs is only 49%, the chance of randomly matching these positions in TIRs from all 21 families is extremely small.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe approximately 100-aa N-terminus of RAG1 may be missing from the sea urchin and lancelet genomes or highly diverged and difficult to detect.
“None of the sea urchin and lancelet proteins align to the approximately 100-aa N-terminus of RAG1, which may indicate that this portion is missing from the genome or highly diverged and difficult to detect.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTransposition of the fly Hermes transposon, which belongs to the hAT superfamily, is characterized by a double-strand break via hairpin formation on flanking DNA and 3′ OH joining to the target DNA.
“Analogously to V(D)J recombination, transposition of the fly Hermes transposon, which belongs to the hAT superfamily, is also characterized by a double-strand break via hairpin formation on flanking DNA and 3′ OH joining to the target DNA [25].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Zhou, 2004, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe ring finger motif of RAG1 functions as a zinc-binding domain, is involved in dimerization, and acts as an E3 ligase in ubiquitylation.
“It is thought that the ring finger motif of RAG1 functions as a zinc-binding domain, is involved in dimerization [30,35], and acts as an E3 ligase in the ubiquitylation [36].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningTransib relics whose TPase-coding regions contained numerous stop codons and indels were ignored unless several copies were available.
“To avoid background noise introduced by mutations, Transib relics, whose TPase-coding regions contained numerous stop codons and indels, were ignored unless several copies were available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAdditional biochemical evidence favoring evolution of V(D)J recombination from transposable elements was reported after submission of the manuscript.
“After submission of our manuscript, additional biochemical evidence favoring evolution of V(D)J recombination from transposable elements was reported [25].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Zhou, 2004, Nature source
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAutonomous DNA transposons from the MuDR, Harbinger, and En/Spm superfamilies are each known to encode a second regulatory protein, whereas some transposons from these superfamilies encode the TPase only.
“Autonomous DNA transposons from the MuDR, Harbinger, and En/Spm superfamilies are each known to encode a second regulatory protein [23,24], whereas some transposons from these superfamilies encode the TPase only.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [23]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [24] Kapitonov, 2004, DNA Cell Biol source
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
Sequence similarity between the RAG1 core and Transib TPases reflects common evolutionary ancestry rather than convergence.
“The RAG1 Ei values decreased as the number of Transib TPases used for the PSSM construction increased due to the fact that RAG1 evolved from a Transib TPase.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The absence of detectable Transib transposons in sequenced genomes indicates true absence rather than incomplete genome coverage.
“Genomes of plants and vertebrates seem to be free of any recognizable Transib transposons (Figure 1).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The N-terminal domain of RAG1 is functionally distinct from the core domain.
“The N-terminal domain of RAG1 has long been viewed as distinct from the core domain due to its lack of direct involvement in the V(D)J recombination reaction.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The 5-bp TSDs and TIRs characteristic of the Transib superfamily are reliable markers of Transib origin.
“We also could not identify the 5-bp TSDs and TIRs characteristic of the Transib superfamily.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The absence of detectable RAG2-like sequences in the sequenced portions of the sea urchin, lancelet, hydra, and sea anemone genomes indicates that RAG2 was not present in these genomes.
“Also, we could not find any RAG2-like sequences in the recently sequenced sea urchin, lancelet, hydra, and sea anemone genomes, which encode RAG1-like sequences.”
The paper relies on this without support.
RAG1/2-mediated transpositions are characterized by 5-bp (sometimes 4-bp) TSDs, whereas all known hAT transposons are characterized by 8-bp TSDs.
“Second, although RAG1/2-mediated transpositions are characterized by 5-bp (sometimes 4-bp) TSDs, all known hAT transposons are characterized by 8-bp TSDs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Typically, TPase-coding autonomous DNA transposons are present in only a few complete copies per genome, while sequences homologous to their terminal portions, including specific TIRs, are usually abundant due to proliferation of nonautonomous DNA transposons.
“Typically, TPase-coding autonomous DNA transposons are present in only a few complete copies per genome. At the same time, sequences homologous to their terminal portions, including specific TIRs, are usually abundant due to the proliferation of nonautonomous DNA transposons fueled by the TPase expressed by the corresponding low-copy autonomous elements.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Rag1/2-like cluster and other findings suggest these genes have been part of animal genomes longer than previously thought.
“The presence of this cluster, along with other recent findings (37), suggested the possibility that these genes had been part of animal genomes for longer than previously considered.”
From The Genome of the Sea Urchin <i>Strongylocentrotus purpuratus</i> (2006) · cites this paper as [37]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
RAG2 is said to have emerged in both jawed and jawless vertebrates
MinorThe abstract places RAG2's emergence in jawed vertebrates, while the Discussion places its introduction in jawless vertebrates.
“We also suggest that the RAG2 protein was not encoded by ancient Transib transposons but emerged in jawed vertebrates as a counterpart of RAG1 necessary for the V(D)J recombination reaction.”
“RAG2 was introduced in a separate event in jawless vertebrates.”
The stated Transib TIR length does not match its components
MinorThe listed heptamer, spacer, and nonamer contain 7, 23, and 9 bases, respectively, totaling 39 bp rather than 38 bp.
Reported 38 · recomputed 39
“The 38-bp consensus TIR of Transib transposons consists of a conserved 5′- CACAATG heptamer separated by a variable 23-bp spacer from an AAAAAAATC-3′ nonamer.”
The hydra RAG1-like protein has two names
MinorThe hydra sequence is called RAG1L_HM in one section but RAG1L_NM when the assembled hydra gene is described.
“we identified an intermediate RAG1-like sequence in Hydra magnipapillata, called RAG1L_HM”
“Using these trace sequences, we partially assembled a hydra gene, called RAG1L_NM, which encodes the RAG1 core–like protein.”
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302 · see citing works
MEGA3: Integrated software for Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis and sequence alignment
Kumar, S. (2004) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/5.2.150 · Cited by 11,642 · see citing works
T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment.
Notredame, C., Higgins, D., & Heringa, J. (2000) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4042 · Cited by 7,321 · see citing works
Somatic generation of antibody diversity
Tonegawa, S. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/302575a0 · Cited by 4,005 · see citing works
RAG-1 and RAG-2, Adjacent Genes That Synergistically Activate V(D)J Recombination
Oettinger, M. A., Schatz, D. G., Gorka, C., & Baltimore, D. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2360047 · Cited by 1,457 · see citing works
Schäffer, A. A. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.14.2994 · Cited by 1,375 · see citing works
Repbase update: a database and an electronic journal of repetitive elements.
Jurka, J. (2000) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02093-x · Cited by 1,069 · see citing works
Self-citationSequences at the somatic recombination sites of immunoglobulin light-chain genes
Sakano, H., Huppi, K. E., Heinrich, G., & Tonegawa, S. (1979) · Nature · doi:10.1038/280288a0 · Cited by 857 · see citing works
Transposition mediated by RAG1 and RAG2 and its implications for the evolution of the immune system
Agrawal, A., Eastman, Q. M., & Schatz, D. G. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/29457 · Cited by 811 · see citing works
V(D)J Recombination: RAG Proteins, Repair Factors, and Regulation
Gellert, M. F. (2002) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.biochem.71.090501.150203 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
[33] Analysis of compositionally biased regions in sequence databases
Wootton, J. C., & Federhen, S. (1996) · Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology · doi:10.1016/s0076-6879(96)66035-2 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
The timing of eukaryotic evolution: Does a relaxed molecular clock reconcile proteins and fossils?
Douzery, E. J. P., Snell, E. A., Bapteste, E., Delsuc, F., & Philippe, H. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0403984101 · Cited by 638 · see citing works
DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Hiom, K., Melek, M., & Gellert, M. (1998) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81587-1 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
Rolling-circle transposons in eukaryotes
Kapitonov, V. V., & Jurka, J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.151269298 · Cited by 528 · see citing works
Self-citationEstimating metazoan divergence times with a molecular clock
Peterson, K. J., Lyons, J. B., Nowak, K. S., Takacs, C. M., Wargo, M. J., & McPeek, M. A. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0401670101 · Cited by 461 · see citing works
Molecular paleontology of transposable elements in the <i>Drosophila melanogaster</i> genome
Kapitonov, V. V., & Jurka, J. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0732024100 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Self-citationSimilarities Between Initiation of V(D)J Recombination and Retroviral Integration
van Gent, D. C., Mizuuchi, K., & Gellert, M. F. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.271.5255.1592 · Cited by 283 · see citing works
New insights into V(D)J recombination and its role in the evolution of the immune system
Thompson, C. B. (1995) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/1074-7613(95)90124-8 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Predicting coiled-coil regions in proteins
Lupas, A. N. (1997) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/s0959-440x(97)80056-5 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
The Homeodomain Region of Rag-1 Reveals the Parallel Mechanisms of Bacterial and V(D)J Recombination
Spanopoulou, E., Zaitseva, F., Wang, F.-H., Santagata, S., Baltimore, D., & Panayotou, G. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81344-6 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Transposition of hAT elements links transposable elements and V(D)J recombination
Zhou, L., Mitra, R., Atkinson, P. W., Burgess Hickman, A., Dyda, F., & Craig, N. L. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03157 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Two Pairs of Recombination Signals Are Sufficient to Cause Immunoglobulin V-(D)-J Joining
Akira, S., Okazaki, K., & Sakano, H. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3120312 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Landree, M. A., Wibbenmeyer, J. A., & Roth, D. B. (1999) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.13.23.3059 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
RAG1 Mediates Signal Sequence Recognition and Recruitment of RAG2 in V(D)J Recombination
Difilippantonio, M. J., McMahan, C. J., Eastman, Q., Spanopoulou, E., & Schatz, D. G. (1996) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81343-4 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Mutations of acidic residues in RAG1 define the active site of the V(D)J recombinase
Kim, D. R., Dai, Y., Mundy, C. L., Yang, W., & Oettinger, M. A. (1999) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.13.23.3070 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Characterization and expression of the recombination activating genes (rag1 and rag2) of zebrafish
Willett, C. E., Cherry, J. J., & Steiner, L. A. (1997) · Immunogenetics · doi:10.1007/s002510050221 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Molecular synapomorphies resolve evolutionary relationships of extant jawed vertebrates
Venkatesh, B., Erdmann, M. V., & Brenner, S. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.201415598 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Conservation of sequence in recombination signal sequence spacers
Ramsden, D. A., Baetz, K., & Wu, G. E. (1994) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/22.10.1785 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Expression and V(D)J recombination activity of mutated RAG-1 proteins
Sadofsky, M. J., Hessw, J. E., McBlane, J. F., & Gellert, M. F. (1993) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/21.24.5644 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Dispensable sequence motifs in the RAG-1 and RAG-2 genes for plasmid V(D)J recombination.
Silver, D. P., Spanopoulou, E., Mulligan, R. C., & Baltimore, D. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.13.6100 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Bellon, S. F., Rodgers, K. K., Schatz, D. G., Coleman, J. E., & Steitz, T. A. (1997) · Nature Structural Biology · doi:10.1038/nsb0797-586 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Distinct Roles of RAG1 and RAG2 in Binding the V(D)J Recombination Signal Sequences
Akamatsu, Y., & Oettinger, M. A. (1998) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.18.8.4670 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
The phylogenetic origins of the antigen‐binding receptors and somatic diversification mechanisms
Cannon, J. P., Haire, R. N., Rast, J. P., et al. (2004) · Immunological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00166.x · Cited by 132 · see citing works
<i>Harbinger</i> Transposons and an Ancient HARBI1 Gene Derived from a Transposase
Kapitonov, V. V., & Jurka, J. (2004) · DNA and Cell Biology · doi:10.1089/104454904323090949 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Self-citationRejoining of DNA by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Melek, M., Gellert, M. F., & van Gent, D. C. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5361.301 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
A Zinc-binding Domain Involved in the Dimerization of RAG1
Rodgers, K. K., Bu, Z., Fleming, K. G., Schatz, D. G., Engelman, D. M., & Coleman, J. E. (1996) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1996.0382 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
In vivo transposition mediated by V(D)J recombinase in human T lymphocytes
Messier, T., O'Neill, J. P., Hou, S., et al. (2003) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1093/emboj/cdg137 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
The RAG1 N-terminal domain is an E3 ubiquitin ligasePreprint
Yurchenko, V., Xue, Z., & Sadofsky, M. J. (2003) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.1058103 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Conservation of the global sex determination gene tra-1 in distantly related nematodesPreprint
Pires‐daSilva, A., & Sommer, R. J. (2004) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.293504 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
A Functional Analysis of the Spacer of V(D)J Recombination Signal Sequences
Lee, A. I., Fugmann, S. D., Cowell, L. G., Ptaszek, L. M., Kelsoe, G. H., & Schatz, D. G. (2003) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0000001 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
The Esterase and PHD Domains in CR1-Like Non-LTR Retrotransposons
Kapitonov, V. V., & Jurka, J. (2003) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msg011 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Self-citationTsai, C., Drejer, A. H., & Schatz, D. G. (2002) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.984502 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Arbuckle, J. L., Fauss, L., Simpson, R., Ptaszek, L. M., & Rodgers, K. K. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m105988200 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Aidinis, V., Dias, D. C., Gomez, C. A., Bhattacharyya, D., Spanopoulou, E., & Santagata, S. (2000) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.11.5826 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
V(D)J Recombination and RAG-Mediated Transposition in Yeast
Clatworthy, A. E., Valencia, M. A., Haber, J. E., et al. (2003) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(03)00305-8 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
A C-Terminal Region of RAG1 Contacts the Coding DNA during V(D)J Recombination
Mo, X., Tu, B., & Sadofsky, M. J. (2001) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.21.6.2038-2047.2001 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Lewis, S. M., & Wu, G. E. (2000) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.191.10.1631 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Solovyev, 2002, Current Topics in Computational Biology: MIT Press, 361
- Nicholas, 1997, EMBNEW News, 4, 14
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Genome of the Sea Urchin <i>Strongylocentrotus purpuratus</i>
Sodergren, E., Weinstock, G. M., Davidson, E. H., Cameron, R. A., Gibbs, R. A., Angerer, R. C., Angerer, L. M., Arnone, M. I., Burgess, D. R., Burke, R. D., et al. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1133609 · Cited by 1,132 · see citing works
The immune gene repertoire encoded in the purple sea urchin genome
Hibino, T., Loza-Coll, M., Messier, C., Majeske, A. J., Cohen, A. H., Terwilliger, D. P., Buckley, K. M., Brockton, V., Nair, S. V., Berney, K., et al. (2006) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.065 · Cited by 630 · see citing works
LINE-1 elements in structural variation and disease
Beck, C. R., Garcia-Perez, J. L., Badge, R. M., & Moran, J. V. (2011) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-082509-141802 · Cited by 615 · see citing works
Mobile DNA in Health and Disease
Kazazian, H. H., & Moran, J. V. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1510092 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
An ancient evolutionary origin of the <i>Rag1</i> / <i>2</i> gene locus
Fugmann, S. D., Messier, C., Novack, L. A., Cameron, R. A., & Rast, J. P. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0509720103 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Gentles, A. J., Wakefield, M. J., Kohany, O., Gu, W., Batzer, M. A., Pollock, D. D., & Jurka, J. (2007) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.6070707 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Self-citationRichardson, J. M., Colloms, S. D., Finnegan, D. J., & Walkinshaw, M. D. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.012 · Cited by 145 · see citing works
Our Conflict with Transposable Elements and Its Implications for Human Disease
Burns, K. H. (2020) · Annual Review of Pathology: Mechanisms of Disease · doi:10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012419-032633 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
<i>Harbinger</i> Transposons and an Ancient HARBI1 Gene Derived from a Transposase
Kapitonov, V. V., & Jurka, J. (2004) · DNA and Cell Biology · doi:10.1089/104454904323090949 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Self-citationA bend, flip and trap mechanism for transposon integration
Morris, E. R., Grey, H., McKenzie, G., Jones, A. C., & Richardson, J. M. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.15537 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kapitonov, V. V., & Jurka, J.
- Affiliations
- Genetic Information Research Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kapitonov, Vladimir V
- Jurka, Jerzy
- Venue
- PLoS Biology
- Publisher
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Published
- 2005-05-24
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- e181
- ISSN
- 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
- 1545-7885
- PMC
- PMC1131882
- OpenAlex
- W1969985598
- Semantic Scholar
- b01d13e0781d1c5ebb350f843dd171860152bb8f
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 25
- FWCI
- 32.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (E P41 LM06252-04A1, P41LM006252)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Keywords
- RAG1, RAG2, V(D)J recombination, DNA transposons, recombination signal sequences, jawed vertebrates, sea urchins, amphioxus, Hydra, Nematostella vectensis, jawless fishes, adaptive evolution, immunoglobulin gene diversification
- MeSH terms
- Aedes, Animals, DNA Transposable Elements, Drosophila, Humans, Hydra, Recombination, Genetic, Sea Urchins, Genes, RAG-1, Genome, Homeodomain Proteins, Anemone, VDJ Recombinases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review