Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 342

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protective Efficacy of a Global HIV-1 Mosaic Vaccine against Heterologous SHIV Challenges in Rhesus Monkeys

Open access
Barouch, Dan H., Stephenson, Kathryn E., Borducchi, Erica N., Smith, Kaitlin, Stanley, Kelly, McNally, Anna G., Liu, Jinyan, Abbink, Peter, Maxfield, Lori F., Seaman, Michael S., Dugast, Anne-Sophie, Alter, Galit, Ferguson, Melissa, Li, Wenjun, Earl, Patricia L., Moss, Bernard, Giorgi, Elena E., Szinger, James J., Eller, Leigh Anne, Billings, Erik A., Rao, Mangala, Tovanabutra, Sodsai, Sanders-Buell, Eric, Weijtens, Mo, Pau, Maria G., Schuitemaker, Hanneke, Robb, Merlin L., Kim, Jerome H., Korber, Bette T., Michael, Nelson L.·2013·Cell

Abstract

SUMMARY The global diversity of HIV-1 represents a critical challenge facing HIV-1 vaccine development. HIV-1 mosaic antigens are bioinformatically optimized immunogens designed for improved coverage of HIV-1 diversity. However, the protective efficacy of global HIV-1 vaccine antigens has not previously been evaluated. Here we demonstrate the capacity of bivalent HIV-1 mosaic antigens to protect rhesus monkeys against acquisition of heterologous challenges with the difficult-to-neutralize simian-human immunodeficiency virus SHIV-SF162P3. Adenovirus/poxvirus and adenovirus/adenovirus vector-based vaccines expressing HIV-1 mosaic Env, Gag, and Pol afforded a significant reduction in the per-exposure acquisition risk following repetitive, intrarectal SHIV-SF162P3 challenges. Protection against acquisition of infection was correlated with vaccine-elicited binding, neutralizing, and functional non-neutralizing antibodies. These data demonstrate the protective efficacy of HIV-1 mosaic antigens and suggest a potential strategy towards the development of a global HIV-1 vaccine. Moreover, our findings suggest that the coordinated activity of multiple antibody functions may contribute to protection against difficult-to-neutralize viruses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.061

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

See all 342

Metadata

Authors
Barouch, D. H., Stephenson, K. E., Borducchi, E. N., Smith, K., Stanley, K., McNally, A. G., Liu, J., Abbink, P., Maxfield, L. F., Seaman, M. S., Dugast, A.-S., Alter, G., Ferguson, M., Li, W., Earl, P. L., Moss, B., Giorgi, E. E., Szinger, J. J., Eller, L. A., Billings, E. A., Rao, M., Tovanabutra, S., Sanders-Buell, E., Weijtens, M., Pau, M. G., Schuitemaker, H., Robb, M. L., Kim, J. H., Korber, B. T., & Michael, N. L.
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
155
Issue
3
Pages
531-539
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2024608724
Cited by
342
References
33
FWCI
15.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Protective Efficacy of a Global HIV-1 Mosaic Vaccine against Heterologous SHIV Challenges in Rhesus Monkeys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.061
The paper
Barouch, D. H., Stephenson, K. E., Borducchi, E. N., Smith, K., Stanley, K., McNally, A. G., Liu, J., Abbink, P., Maxfield, L. F., Seaman, M. S., Dugast, A.-S., Alter, G., Ferguson, M., Li, W., Earl, P. L., Moss, B., Giorgi, E. E., Szinger, J. J., Eller, L. A., . . . Michael, N. L. (2013). Protective Efficacy of a Global HIV-1 Mosaic Vaccine against Heterologous SHIV Challenges in Rhesus Monkeys. Cell. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.061

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.