Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 465

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vaccine protection against acquisition of neutralization-resistant SIV challenges in rhesus monkeys

Open access
Barouch, Dan H., Liu, Jinyan, Li, Hualin, Maxfield, Lori F., Abbink, Peter, Lynch, Diana M., Iampietro, M. Justin, SanMiguel, Adam, Seaman, Michael S., Ferrari, Guido, Forthal, Donald N., Ourmanov, Ilnour, Hirsch, Vanessa M., Carville, Angela, Mansfield, Keith G., Stablein, Donald, Pau, Maria G., Schuitemaker, Hanneke, Sadoff, Jerald C., Billings, Erik A., Rao, Mangala, Robb, Merlin L., Kim, Jerome H., Marovich, Mary A., Goudsmit, Jaap, Michael, Nelson L.·2012·Nature

Abstract

Preclinical studies of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) vaccine candidates have typically shown post-infection virological control, but protection against acquisition of infection has previously only been reported against neutralization-sensitive virus challenges. Here we demonstrate vaccine protection against acquisition of fully heterologous, neutralization-resistant simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) challenges in rhesus monkeys. Adenovirus/poxvirus and adenovirus/adenovirus-vector-based vaccines expressing SIVSME543 Gag, Pol and Env antigens resulted in an 80% or greater reduction in the per-exposure probability of infection against repetitive, intrarectal SIVMAC251 challenges in rhesus monkeys. Protection against acquisition of infection showed distinct immunological correlates compared with post-infection virological control and required the inclusion of Env in the vaccine regimen. These data demonstrate the proof-of-concept that optimized HIV-1 vaccine candidates can block acquisition of stringent, heterologous, neutralization-resistant virus challenges in rhesus monkeys.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature10766

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 465

Metadata

Authors
Barouch, D. H., Liu, J., Li, H., Maxfield, L. F., Abbink, P., Lynch, D. M., Iampietro, M. J., SanMiguel, A., Seaman, M. S., Ferrari, G., Forthal, D. N., Ourmanov, I., Hirsch, V. M., Carville, A., Mansfield, K. G., Stablein, D., Pau, M. G., Schuitemaker, H., Sadoff, J. C., Billings, E. A., Rao, M., Robb, M. L., Kim, J. H., Marovich, M. A., Goudsmit, J., & Michael, N. L.
Venue
Nature
Published
2012-01-04
Volume
482
Issue
7383
Pages
89-93
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W1965175217
Cited by
465
References
27
FWCI
34.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vaccine protection against acquisition of neutralization-resistant SIV challenges in rhesus monkeys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/nature10766
The paper
Barouch, D. H., Liu, J., Li, H., Maxfield, L. F., Abbink, P., Lynch, D. M., Iampietro, M. J., SanMiguel, A., Seaman, M. S., Ferrari, G., Forthal, D. N., Ourmanov, I., Hirsch, V. M., Carville, A., Mansfield, K. G., Stablein, D., Pau, M. G., Schuitemaker, H., Sadoff, J. C., . . . Michael, N. L. (2012). Vaccine protection against acquisition of neutralization-resistant SIV challenges in rhesus monkeys. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10766

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.